Abstract
A central aspect in biology and ecology is to determine the combination of factors that influence the distribution of species. In the case of herbivorous insects, the distribution of herbivorous species is necessarily associated with their host plants, a pattern often referred to as “host use”. Novel interactions that arise during a biological invasion can have important effects on the dynamics of that invasion, especially if it is driven by only a subset of the genetic diversity of the invading species. This is the case of the wellknown South American cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum, a successfully used biological control agent of non-native Opuntia cacti in Australia and South Africa, but now threatening unique cactus diversity and agriculture in North America. We studied the patterns of host plant usage by and host plant availability for C. cactorum under field conditions in Argentina, covering the geographical range of the four C. cactorum phylogroups and the recently documented southern distribution. We also assessed female preference and larval performance under laboratory conditions. Cactoblastis cactorum showed a geographical pattern of host use in its native range that was related to host availability. Laboratory assays of female preference showed some degree of preference to oviposit on O. ficus-indica, O. leucotricha and O. quimilo, but it was not positively correlated with the performance of larvae. These findings contribute to the further comprehension of the host use dynamics of C. cactorum in the insects’ native range, and could provide useful information for assessing the risk and future spread of this insect in North America.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson EF (2001) The cactus family. Timber Press, Portland
Briano J, Varone L, Logarzo G, Villamil C (2012) Extended geographical distribution and host range of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Argentina. Fla Entomol 95(1):233–237
Brooks C, Ervin G, Varone L, Logarzo G (2012) Native ecotypic variation and the role of host identity in the spread of an invasive herbivore, Cactoblastis cactorum. Ecology 93(2):402–410
Courtney SP, Forsberg J (1988) Host use by two pierid butterflies varies with host density. Funct Ecol 2(1):67–75
Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by natural selection. John Murray, London
Dodd AP (1940) The biological campaign against prickly-pear. Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board, Brisbane
Forister ML (2004) Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies. Ecol Entomol 29(3):264–272
Fox LR, Morrow PA (1981) Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? Science 211:887–893
Gandhi K, Herms DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Inv 12:389–405
Hight SD, Carpenter JE (2009) Flight phenology of male Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) at different latitudes in the southeastern United States. Fla Entomol 92(2):208–216
Hijmans RJ (2012) DIVA-GIS (version 7.5.0.0). Free mapping program, http://www.diva-gis.org/
Jaenike J (1978) On optimal oviposition behavior in phytophagous insects. Theor Popul Biol 14(3):350–356
Jermy T (1984) Evolution of insect/host plant relationships. Am Nat 124:609–630
Jezorek HA, Stiling PD, Carpenter JE (2010) Targets of an invasive species: oviposition preference and larval performance of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on 14 North American opuntioid cacti. Environ Entomol 39(6):1884–1892
Johnson DM, Stiling PD (1996) Host specificity of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth, in Florida. Environ Entomol 25:743–748
Johnson DM, Stiling PD (1998) Distribution and dispersal of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth, in Florida. Fla Entomol 81:12–22
Kareiva P (1982) Experimental and mathematical analysis of herbivore movement: quantifying the influence of plant spacing and quality on foraging discrimination. Ecol Monogr 52(3):261–282
Kiesling R (2005) Cactaceae, Cactáceas. In: Troncoso NS, Bacigalupo NM (eds) Flora Ilustrada de Entre Ríos. Dicotiledoneas Arquiclamídeas. B: Geraniales a Umbelliflorales, vol IV, 4b. Colección Científica INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp 401–444
Kiesling R, Meglioli S (2003) Cactaceae, Cactáceas. In: Kiesling R (ed) Flora de San Juan, República Argentina, vol II., Dicotoledóneas Dialipétalas (Segunda parte: Oxalidáceas a Umbelíferas)Estudio Sigma, Buenos Aires, pp 161–211
Kuussaari M, Singer M, Hanski I (2000) Local specialization and landscape-level influence on host use in an herbivorous insect. Ecology 81(8):2177–2187
Logarzo G, Casalinuovo M, Piccinali R, Braun K, Hasson E (2011) Geographic host use variability and host range evolutionary dynamics in the phytophagous insect Apagomerella versicolor (Cerambycidae). Oecologia 165(2):387–402
Mafokoane LD, Zimmermann HG, Hill MP (2007) Development of Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on six North American Opuntia species. Afr Entomol 15(2):295–299
Mann J (1969) Cactus-feeding insects and mites. United States National Museum Bulletin, vol 256, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, USA
Marsico TD, Wallace LE, Ervin GN, Brooks CP, McClure JE, Welch ME (2011) Geographic patterns of genetic diversity from the native range of Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) support the documented history of invasion and multiple introductions for invasive populations. Biol Invasions 13(4):857–868
Mayhew PJ (1998) Testing the preference-performance hypothesis in phytophagous insects: lessons from chrysanthemum leafminer (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Environ Entomol 27:45–52
Mayhew PJ (2001) Herbivore host choice and optimal bad motherhood. Trends Ecol Evol 16(4):165–167
McFadyen RE (1985) Larval characteristics of Cactoblastis spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and the selection of species for biological control of prickly pears (Opuntia spp.). Bull Entomol Res 75:159–168
Myers JH, Monro J, Murray N (1981) Egg clumping, host plant selection and population regulation in Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera). Oecologia 51(1):7–13
Neu CW, Byers CB, Peek JM (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manag 38:541–545
Pettey FW (1948) The biological control of prickly pear in South Africa. Sci Bull Dep Agric Union S Afr 271:1–163
Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1994) Oviposition behavoir in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400
Robertson HG (1987) Oviposition site selection in Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera): constraints and compromises. Oecologia 73:601–608
Scheirs J, Bruyn LD, Verhagen R (2000) Optimization of adult performance determines host choice in a grass miner. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267(1457):2065–2069
Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Pintor LM, Preisser E, Rehage JS, Vonesh JR (2010) Predator–prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119(4):610–621
Singer MC (1983) Determinants of multiple host use by a phytophagous insect population. Evolution 37(2):389–403
Singer MC (2000) Reducing ambiguity in describing plant–insect interactions: “preference”, “acceptability” and “electivity”. Ecol Lett 3(3):159–162
Singer MC, Ng D, Moore RA (1991) Genetic variation in oviposition preference between butterfly populations. J Insect Behav 4(4):531–535
Starmer WT, Aberdeen V, Lachance MA (1988) The yeast community associated with decaying Opuntia stricta (Haworth) in Florida with regard to the moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg). Fla Sci 51:7–11
Stefanescu C, Jubany J, Dantart J (2006) Egg–laying by the butterfly Iphiclides podalirius (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) on alien plants: a broadening of host range or oviposition mistakes? Anim Biodiv Conserv 29(1):83–90
Tate CD, Hight SD, Carpenter JE (2009) Oviposition preference of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in caged choice experiments and the influence on risk assessment of F1 sterility. Biocontol Sci Technol 19:1–17
Thomas C, Vasco D, Singer M, Ng D, White R, Hinkley D (1990) Diet divergence in two sympatric congeneric butterflies: community or species level phenomenon? Evol Ecol 4(1):62–74
Thompson JN (1988a) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47(1):3–14
Thompson JN (1988b) Variation in preference and specificity in monophagous and oligophagous swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 42(1):118–128
Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36(1):65–89
Van Nouhuys S, Singer MC, Nieminen M (2003) Spatial and temporal patterns of caterpillar performance and the suitability of two host plant species. Ecol Entomol 28:193–202
Varone L, Manteca Acosta M, Logarzo GA, Briano JA, Hight SD, Carpenter JE (2012) Laboratory performance of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on South and North American Opuntia species ocurring in Argentina. Fla Entomol 95(4):1163–1173
von Humboldt A (1805) Essai sur la Ge′ographie des Plantes. Levrault, Paris
Wiklund C (1974) The concept of oligophagy and the natural habitats and host plants of Papilio machaon L. in Fennoscandia. Insect Syst Evol 5(2):151–1600
Zimmermann HG, Bloem S, Klein H (2007) Biology, history, threat, surveillance and control of the cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/invasoras/images/4/4e/OIEABOOK5dic07.pdf
Acknowledgments
We thank Fabián Font (University of Buenos Aires) for identification of Opuntia spp., Mariana Manteca Acosta for laboratory assistance, and Travis Marsico, Gary Ervin and Chris Brooks (Mississippi State University) for providing information on cactus moth genetic analysis. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varone, L., Logarzo, G.A., Briano, J.A. et al. Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) use of Opuntia host species in Argentina. Biol Invasions 16, 2367–2380 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0670-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0670-9