Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 167–175 | Cite as

Correlated recovery of five lizard populations following eradication of invasive mammals

  • Joanne M. MonksEmail author
  • Adrian Monks
  • David R. Towns
Original Paper

Abstract

Many conservation decisions rely on the assumption that multiple populations will respond similarly to management. However, few attempts have been made to evaluate indicators of population trends (i.e. population indicator species). Eradication of introduced mammals from offshore islands is a commonly used management technique for conservation of native taxa in New Zealand. Pacific rats and rabbits were eradicated from Korapuki Island in 1986/1987 enabling population recovery of native species that had been suppressed by predation or competition. However, the degree to which species’ responses were correlated has not been evaluated. We investigated correlations among lizard population trends on Korapuki Island as a test of the population indicator species concept. Our dataset consisted of captures of the five resident lizard species (three skinks, two geckos) from biannual pitfall trapping over a 10 year period (1986–1995) immediately following rodent eradication. We used a Bayesian modelling approach to examine correlations in population trends (based on mean annual counts) between species. Population trends were positively correlated for all species pairs (substantively for 90 % of pairs) and we detected no negative correlations. Systematic searches for single lizard species may indicate correlated recovery of lizard populations following rodent eradication and provide a cost-effective alternative to traditional ‘whole community’ monitoring. Our findings support evidence-based use of the population indicator species concept in cases where a shared ecological driver can be identified.

Keywords

Conservation management Herpetofauna Indicator species Invasive species Island Population trends 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Colin O’Donnell and Doug Armstrong for providing thoughtful discussions of the ideas presented, Chris Green, Ian McFadden and many others for field assistance, and Richard Earl for GIS support. This work was funded by the New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC) as part of Science Investigations 3940 and 3236 and approved by the DOC Animal Ethics Committee (permit number 213). WinBUGS model code is available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Anderson A (1991) The chronology of colonization in New Zealand. Antiquity 65:767–795Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson IAE (2004) Successional processes induced by fires on the northern offshore islands of New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 28:181–193Google Scholar
  3. Bonn A, Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? Ecol Lett 5:733–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell DJ, Atkinson IAE (2002) Depression of tree recruitment by the Pacific rat (Rattus exulans Peale) on New Zealand’s northern offshore islands. Biol Conserv 107:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caro TM, O’Doherty G (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 13:805–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caro TM, Eadie J, Sih A (2005) Use of substitute species in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 19:1821–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case TJ, Bolger DT (1991) The role of introduced species in shaping the distribution and abundance of island reptiles. Evol Ecol 5:272–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassels R (1984) The role of prehistoric man in the faunal extinctions of New Zealand and other Pacific islands. In: Martin PS, Klein RG (eds) Quaternary extinctions—a prehistoric revolution. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 741–767Google Scholar
  9. Cree A (1994) Low annual reproductive output in female reptiles from New Zealand. N Z J Zool 21:351–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Noon BR et al (2010) Use of abundance of one species as a surrogate for abundance of others. Conserv Biol 24:830–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fewster RM, Buckland ST, Siriwardena GM et al (2000) Analysis of population trends for farmland birds using generalised additive models. Ecology 81:1970–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregory RD, Vorsiek P, van Strien A et al (2007) Population trends of widespread woodland birds in Europe. Ibis 149:78–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoare JM, Adams LK, Bull LS et al (2007a) Attempting to manage complex predator-prey interactions fails to avert imminent extinction of a threatened New Zealand skink population. J Wildl Manage 71:1576–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoare JM, Shirley P, Nelson NJ et al (2007b) Avoiding aliens: behavioural plasticity in habitat use enables large, nocturnal geckos to survive Pacific rat invasions. Biol Conserv 136:510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoare JM, O’Donnell CFJ, Westbrooke I et al (2009) Optimising the sampling of skinks using artificial retreats based on weather conditions and time of day. Appl Herpetol 6:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoare JM, O’Donnell CFJ, Wright EF (2010) Selection of indicator species for State of the Environment reporting: a case study from New Zealand. Pac Conserv Biol 16:76–82Google Scholar
  17. Hoare JM, Monks A, O’Donnell CFJ (2012) Can correlated population trends among forest bird species be predicted by similarity in traits? Wildl Res 39:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoare JM, Monks A, O’Donnell CFJ (2013) Do population indicators work? Investigating correlated responses of bird populations in relation to predator management. Ecol Indic 25:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutcheson J, Walsh P, Given D (1999) Potential value of indicator species for conservation and management of New Zealand terrestrial communities. Department of Conservation, Wellington, p 90Google Scholar
  20. Innes J, Kelly D, Overton JM et al (2010) Predation and other factors currently limiting New Zealand forest birds. N Z J Ecol 34:86–114Google Scholar
  21. Jewell T (2011) A photographic guide to reptiles and amphibians in New Zealand revised edition. New Holland Publishers (NZ) Ltd, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  22. Kendall BE, Bjørnstad ON, Bascompte J et al (2000) Dispersal, environmental correlation, and spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Am Nat 155:628–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landres PB, Verner J, Thomas JW (1988) Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conserv Biol 2:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lettink M, Cree A (2007) Relative use of three types of artificial retreats by terrestrial lizards in grazed coastal shrubland. N Z Appl Herpetol 4:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lettink M, O’Donnell CFJ, Hoare JM (2011) Accuracy and precision of skink counts from artificial retreats. N Z J Ecol 35:236–243Google Scholar
  27. Lindenmayer DB (1999) Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs. For Ecol Manag 115:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2010) Effective ecological monitoring. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Smith PL et al (2002) The focal species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Conserv Biol 16:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Felton A et al (2007) The complementarity of single-species and ecosystem-oriented research in conservation research. Oikos 116:1220–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mannan RW, Morrison ML, Meslow EC (1984) The use of guilds in forest bird management. Wildl Soc Bull 12:426–430Google Scholar
  32. McFadden I, Towns D (1991) Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, northern New Zealand. Department of Conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Nebel S, Porter JL, Kingsford RT (2008) Long-term trends of shorebird populations in eastern Australia and impacts of freshwater extraction. Biol Conserv 141:971–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman DG (1994) Effects of a mouse, Mus musculus, eradication programme and habitat change on lizard populations of Mana Island, New Zealand, with special reference to McGregor’s skink Cyclodina macgregori. N Z J Zool 21:443–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Niemi GJ, Hanowski JM, Lima AR et al (1997) A critical analysis on the use of indicator species in management. J Wildl Manag 61:1240–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norbury G, Heyward R, Parkes J (2009) Skink and invertebrate abundance in relation to vegetation, rabbits and predators in a New Zealand dryland ecosystem. N Z J Ecol 33:24–31Google Scholar
  37. North SG, Bullock DJ, Dulloo ME (1994) Changes in the vegetation and reptile populations on Round Island, Mauritius, following eradication of rabbits. Biol Conserv 67:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Donnell CFJ, Hoare JM (2012) Quantifying the benefits of long-term integrated pest control for forest bird populations in a New Zealand temperate rainforest. N Z J Ecol 36:131–140Google Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
  41. Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Buckland ST et al (1998) Trends in the abundance of farmbirds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed Common Birds Census indices. J Appl Ecol 35:24–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soulé ME (1990) The onslaught of alien species, and other challenges in the coming decades. Conserv Biol 4:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stork NE, Samways MJ (1995) Inventorying and monitoring. In: Heywood VH, Watson RT (eds) Global biodiversity assessment. United Nations Environment Program, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 453–543Google Scholar
  45. Szaro RC (1986) Guild management: an evaluation of avian guilds as a predictive tool. Environ Manag 10:681–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Todd BD, Andrews KM (2008) Response of a reptile guild to forest harvesting. Conserv Biol 22:753–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Towns DR (1991) Response of lizard assemblages in the Mercury Islands, New Zealand, to removal of an introduced rodent: the kiore (Rattus exulans). J R Soc New Zeal 21:119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Towns DR (2002a) Interactions between geckos, honeydew scale insects and host plants revealed on islands in northern New Zealand, following eradication of introduced rats and rabbits. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, Gland, pp 329–335Google Scholar
  49. Towns DR (2002b) Korapuki Island as a case study for restoration of insular ecosystems in New Zealand. J Biogeogr 29:593–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Towns DR, Broome KG (2003) From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. N Z J Zool 30:377–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Towns DR, Daugherty CH (1994) Patterns of range contractions and extinctions in the New Zealand herpetofauna following human colonisation. N Z J Zool 21:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Towns DR, Parrish GR, Westbrooke I (2003) Inferring vulnerability to introduced predators without experimental demonstration: case study of Suter’s skink in New Zealand. Conserv Biol 17:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Towns DR, Atkinson IAE, Daugherty CH (2006) Have the harmful effects of introduced rats on islands been exaggerated? Biol Invasions 8:863–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Towns DT, Parrish GR, Tyrrell CL et al (2007) Responses of tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) to removal of introduced Pacific Rats from islands. Conserv Biol 21:1021–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vellend M, Lilley PL, Starzomski BM (2008) Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys. J Appl Ecol 45:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL et al (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:468–478Google Scholar
  57. Wilmshurst J, Higham TFG (2004) Using rat-gnawed seeds to independently date the arrival of Pacific rats and humans in New Zealand. Holocene 14:801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Worthy TH (1987) Osteological observations on the larger species of the skink Cyclodina and the subfossil occurrence of these and the gecko Hoplodactylus duvaucelii in the North Island New Zealand. N Z J Zool 14:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Worthy TH, Holdaway RN (2002) The lost world of the Moa. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, Prehistoric Life of New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  60. Worthy TH, Tennyson AJD, Archer M et al (2006) Miocene mammal reveals a Mesozoic ghost lineage on insular New Zealand, southwest Pacific. PNAS 103:19419–19423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne M. Monks
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adrian Monks
    • 2
  • David R. Towns
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ConservationScience and Capability GroupChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Landcare ResearchDunedinNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of ConservationScience and Capability GroupAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations