Biological Invasions

, Volume 15, Issue 11, pp 2429–2442 | Cite as

Imported crazy ant displaces imported fire ant, reduces and homogenizes grassland ant and arthropod assemblages

  • Edward G. LeBrun
  • John Abbott
  • Lawrence E. Gilbert
Original Paper


A recently introduced, ecologically dominant, exotic ant species, Nylanderia fulva, is invading the Southeastern United States and Texas. We evaluate how this invader impacts diversity and abundance of co-occurring ants and other arthropods in two grasslands. N. fulva rapidly attains densities up to 2 orders of magnitude greater than the combined abundance of all other ants. Overall ant biomass increases in invaded habitat, indicating that N. fulva exploits resources not fully utilized by the local ant assemblage. At high density, as N. fulva spreads, it eliminates the current ecologically dominant invasive ant, red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta). Compared to imported fire ant dominated habitat, N. fulva invasion zones have lower non-ant arthropod species richness and abundance with impacts differing by trophic category. Further, N. fulva reduces abundance and species richness of the remainder of the ant assemblage and does so in a non-random manner: impacting species with small sized workers much less than species with larger workers. In these and other ant assemblages with a large exotic component, the exotics tend to be small bodied species. As a result, N. fulva almost completely eliminates regionally distributed species, but leaves globally distributed species largely unaffected, thereby systematically favoring introduced over native diversity. S. invicta impacts wildlife and arthropod assemblage structure and is nearly ubiquitous in non-forested habitats of the Southeastern United States and Texas. Its displacement by N. fulva has critical implications for the natural systems of this region.


Biotic homogenization Tramp ants Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens Invasive ants Tawny crazy ant Hairy crazy ant Rasberry crazy ant Paratrechina fulva 



We thank Perry Herman and Land Tejas Companies, Ltd for allowing access to their properties. Residents of Iowa Colony provided information on the history of the area. Jerod Romine, Drew Townsend, and Mike Marischen assisted in conducting field work. Alejandro Calixto and Danny Macdonald provided information on the location of established populations. Funding was provided by the Helen C. Kleberg and Robert J. Kleberg Foundation, and the Lee and Ramona Bass Foundation.

Supplementary material

10530_2013_463_MOESM1_ESM.doc (104 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 104 kb)


  1. Allen CR, Epperson DM, Garmestani AS (2004) Red imported fire ant impacts on wildlife: a decade of research. Am Midl Nat 152(1):88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN (1991) Sampling communities of ground-foraging ants: pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Aust J of Ecol 16(3):273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AntWeb (2011) The California Academy of Sciences. Accessed 1 May 2012
  4. Bihn JH, Gebauer G, Brandl R (2010) Loss of functional diversity of ant assemblages in secondary tropical forests. Ecology 91(3):782–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buczkowski G, Vargo EL, Silverman J (2004) The diminutive supercolony: the Argentine ants of the southeastern United States. Mol Ecol 13(8):2235–2242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buren WF, Allen GE, Whitcomb WH, Lennartz FE, Williams RN (1974) Zoogeography of imported fire ants. J N Y Entomol Soc 82(2):113–124Google Scholar
  7. Camilo GR, Phillips SA Jr (1990) Evolution of ant communities in response to invasion by the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. In: Meer RKV, Jaffe K, Cedeno A (eds) Applied myrmecology: a world perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 190–198Google Scholar
  8. Carson WP, Root RB (2000) Herbivory and plant species coexistence: community regulation by an outbreaking phytophagous insect. Ecol Monogr 70(1):73–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Center for Urban and Structural Entomology (2012) Rasberry crazy ant Nylanderia sp. near pubens. Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University. Accessed 07 Mar 2012
  10. Colwell RK (2011) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, 8.2.0 edn. University of Connecticut, StorrsGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook SC, Wynalda RA, Gold RE, Behmer ST (2012) Macronutrient regulation in the Rasberry crazy ant (Nylanderia sp nr. pubens). Insect Soc 59(1):93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooling M, Hartley S, Dalice AS, Lester PJ (2011) The widespread collapse of an invasive species: Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) in New Zealand. Biol Lett. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1014 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Creighton WS (1950) The ants of North America. Bull Mus Comp Zool Harv Univ 104:1–585Google Scholar
  14. Dunham AE, Mikheyev AS (2010) Influence of an invasive ant on grazing and detrital communities and nutrient fluxes in a tropical forest. Divers Distrib 16(1):33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feener DH, Orr MR, Wackford K, Longo JM, Benson WW, Gilbert LE (2008) Geographic variation in resource dominance, discovery, and parasitoid-mediated competition in the Brazilian range of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta). Ecology 89(7):1824–1836 Google Scholar
  16. Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, McKie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, Hattenschwiler S (2010) Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol 25(6):372–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4(4):379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2004) EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version, 7th edn. Acquired Intelligence and Kesey-Bear, JerichoGoogle Scholar
  19. Gotzek D, Brady SG, Kallal RJ, LaPolla JS (2012) The importance of using multiple approaches for identifying emerging invasive species: the case of the Rasberry crazy ant in the United States. PLoS One 7(9):e45314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffith GE, Bryce SA, Omernik JM, Comstock JA, Rogers AC, Harrison B, Hatch SL, Bezanson D (2004) Ecoregions of Texas (color poster with map, descriptive text, and photographs). US Geological Survey Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  21. Helms KR, Hayden CP, Vinson SB (2011) Plant-based food resources, trophic interactions among alien species, and the abundance of an invasive ant. Biol Invasions 13(1):67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffmann BD, Saul WC (2010) Yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) invasions within undisturbed mainland Australian habitats: no support for biotic resistance hypothesis. Biol Invasions 12(9):3093–3108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoffmann BD, Andersen AN, Hill GJE (1999) Impact of an introduced ant on native rain forest invertebrates: Pheidole megacephala in monsoonal Australia. Oecologia 120(4):595–604Google Scholar
  24. Holway DA (1998) Effect of Argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia 116(1–2):252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol 33:181–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hooper-Bui LM, Strecker R, Chen X, Aguillard D, Miller A (2010) Super-colonies of crazy ants in Louisiana. In: Proceedings of the imported fire ant and invasive ant conference, pp 13–16Google Scholar
  27. Horn K (2009) Examining competitive interactions between Rasberry crazy ants (Paratrechina sp. nr. pubens) and red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) using laboratory and field studies. Masters of Arts, Rice University, Houston, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Human KG, Gordon DM (1997) Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in northern California. Conserv Biol 11(5):1242–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hung ACF, Vinson SB (1978) Factors affecting the distribution of fire ants in Texas (Myrmicinae: Formicidae). Southwest Nat 23(2):205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hymenoptera Online (HOL) (2011) Ohio State University. Accessed 01 May 2012
  31. Kaspari M (2005) Global energy gradients and size in colonial organisms: worker mass and worker number in ant colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(14):5079–5083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King JR, Porter SD (2007) Body size, colony size, abundance, and ecological impact of exotic ants in Florida’s upland ecosystems. Evol Ecol Res 9(5):757–774Google Scholar
  33. LeBrun EG, Tillberg CV, Suarez AV, Folgarait PJ, Smith CR, Holway DA (2007) An experimental study of competitive interactions between red imported fire ants and Argentine ants in a region of native-range sympatry. Ecology 88(1):63–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LeBrun EG, Plowes RM, Gilbert LE (2012) Imported fire ants near the edge of their range: disturbance and moisture determine prevalence and impact of an invasive social insect. J Anim Ecol 81(4):884–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lester PJ (2005) Determinants for the successful establishment of exotic ants in New Zealand. Divers Distrib 11(4):279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacGown J, Layton B (2010) The invasive Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), reported from Mississippi. Midsouth Entomol 3:44–47Google Scholar
  37. McGlynn TP (1999) The worldwide transfer of ants: geographical distribution and ecological invasions. J Biogeogr 26(3):535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14(11):450–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyers JM (2008) Identification, distribution and control of an invasive pest ant, Paratrechina sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Texas. Doctor of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyers JM, Gold RE (2008) Identification of an exotic pest ant, Paratrechina pubens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Texas. Sociobiology 52(3):589–604Google Scholar
  41. Morris JR, Steigman KL (1993) Effects of polygyne fire ant invasion on native ants of a blackland prairie in Texas. Southwest Nat 38(2):136–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morrison LW (2002) Long-term impacts of an arthropod-community invasion by the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Ecology 83(8):2337–2345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ness JH, Bronstein JL, Andersen AN, Holland JN (2004) Ant body size predicts dispersal distance of ant-adapted seeds: implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology 85(5):1244–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Passera L (1994) Characteristics of tramp species. In: Williams PF (ed) Ants: biology, impact and control of introduced species. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  45. Porter SD, Savignano DA (1990) Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecology 71(6):2095–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TM (2011) A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. Am J Bot 98(3):539–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Biodiversity—global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. SAS Institute (2011) JMP®, 9.0th edn. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  49. Tillberg CV, Holway DA, LeBrun EG, Suarez AV (2007) Trophic ecology of invasive Argentine ants in their native and introduced ranges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(52):20856–20861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tschinkel WR (2006) The fire ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Valles SM, Oi DH, Yu F, Tan X, Buss EA (2012) Metatransciptomics and pyrosequencing facilitate discovery of pentential viral natural enemies of the invasive Caribbean crazy ant, Nylanderia pubens. PLOS One 7(2):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward PS (1987) Distribution of the introduced Argentine Ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55(2):1–16Google Scholar
  53. Wilder SM, Holway DA, Suarez AV, LeBrun EG, Eubanks MD (2011) Intercontinental differences in resource use reveal the importance of mutualisms for invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(51):20639–20644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson EO (1951) Variation and adaptation in the imported fire ant. Evolution 5:68–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson EO (1958) The fire ant. Sci Am 198(3):36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zarr JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Simon and Schuster, NJGoogle Scholar
  57. Zenner de Polania I, Bolaños RN (1985) Habitos alimenticios y relaciones simbioticas de la “hormiga loca” Nylanderia fulva con otros artropodos. Rev Colomb Entomol 11(1):3–10Google Scholar
  58. Zenner de Polania I, Cedeno A (1990) Biological aspects of the “Hormiga Loca”, Paratrechina (Nylanderia) fulva (Mayr), in Colombia. In: Vander Meer RK, Jaffe K (eds) Applied myrmecology, a world perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 290–297Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward G. LeBrun
    • 1
  • John Abbott
    • 1
  • Lawrence E. Gilbert
    • 2
  1. 1.Brackenridge Field Laboratory, Section of Integrative BiologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Section of Integrative BiologyThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations