The importance of roads, nutrients, and climate for invasive plant establishment in riparian areas in the northwestern United States
- 580 Downloads
Natural and anthropogenic site characteristics play a role in determining the current distribution of invasive plant species. An understanding of these characteristics can be used to prioritize areas for monitoring and control efforts and to determine appropriate management actions to lower site invasion risk. We used species distribution models to look for attributes associated with invasion and to determine the extent to which these attributes varied across a suite of species. We modeled the presence-absence of 11 invasive plant species along riparian areas in the northwestern United States using the model Random Forests. We found that climate variables were most important for predicting species distributions across the large study area and factors related to nutrients, land cover, and disturbance had moderate importance. We also found that there was a general pattern related to invasion for almost all species. Invasion was more likely to occur at hotter, drier sites near roads in unforested areas. In addition, high nutrient levels and proximity to streams with lower baseflow values also generally increased the likelihood that at least one invasive species would be present. Examining patterns across a broad range of regions can help suggest general mechanisms of invasion as well as provide region-specific management recommendations.
KeywordsDistribution models Invasive plant species Fluctuating resource Propagule pressure Riparian
Thanks to J. Olson, R. Hill, R. Lokteff, A. Hill, and P. Ebertowski for data assistance. B. Roper, E. Archer, and C. Hawkins helped refine study questions and analysis. Members of the Kettenring lab, especially L. Long, N. Hough-Snee, E. Hazelton, and A. Sweetman, led to manuscript improvement. Funding was provided by the S.J. Quinney Masters Fellowship at Utah State University and the USDA Forest Service.
- Evangelista P, Kumar S, Stohlgren T, Jarnevich C, Crall A, Norman J III, Barnett D (2008) Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Biodiv Lett 14:808–817Google Scholar
- Gesch D, Evans G, Mauck J, Hutchinson J, Carswell Jr. WJ (2009) The national map—elevation: US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2009–3053Google Scholar
- Google Inc. (2010) Google Earth (Version 5.2) [Software]. Available from http://www.google.com/earth/index.html
- Henderson RC, Archer EK, Bouwes BA, Coles-Ritchie MS, Kershner JL (2005) PACFISH/INFISH biological opinion (PIBO): effectiveness monitoring program seven-year status report 1998 through 2004, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-162. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
- Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2:18–22Google Scholar
- Ludington S, Moring BC, Miller RJ, Stone PA, Bookstrom AA, Bedford DR, Evans JG, Haxel GA, Nutt CJ, Flyn KS, Hopkin MJ (2007) Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States Western States: California, Nevada, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah, Open-File Rep. 2005–1305. US Geological Survey, RestonGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing ViennaGoogle Scholar
- US Census Bureau (2009) US Census 2000 TIGER/Line files machine-readable data files. US Census Bureau, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Wolock DM (2003) Base-flow index grid for the conterminous United States. US Geological Survey, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar