Biological Invasions

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 1113–1123 | Cite as

Fire promotes downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) seed dispersal

  • Arnaud Monty
  • Cynthia S. Brown
  • Danielle B. Johnston
Original Paper

Abstract

Particularly well-known among the many impacts of the invasive annual grass downy brome (Bromus tectorum, Poaceae) is its ability to alter fire cycles and increase in abundance after fire. However, little is known about how fire influences B. tectorum dispersal. We quantified fire effects on B. tectorum dispersal using three recently burned areas in the western region of the Colorado Rocky Mountains by marking diaspores (seeds) with fluorescent powder, and then recovering them at night using ultraviolet lights. Diaspores were of two types: with and without sterile florets attached. We also characterized vegetation cover and near-surface wind speed in burned and unburned areas. Diaspores travelled much farther in burned areas than in nearby unburned areas (mean ± standard error at the end of the experiment: 209 ± 16 cm and 38 ± 1 cm, respectively; maximal distance at the end of the experiment: 2,274 cm and 150 cm, respectively), indicating an increase in dispersal distance after fire. Diaspores with sterile florets attached dispersed longer distances than those without sterile florets (mean ± standard error at the end of the experiment: 141 ± 14 cm and 88 ± 7 cm, respectively). Vegetation cover was lower and wind speeds were higher in the burned areas. Our results indicate that at least one of the mechanisms by which the spread of B. tectorum is promoted by fire is through increased seed dispersal distance. Preventing movement of seeds from nearby infestations into burned areas may help avoid the rapid population expansion often observed.

Keywords

Diaspore Secondary dispersal Wind dispersal Seed dimorphism Seed tracking Cheatgrass 

Supplementary material

10530_2012_355_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (558 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 559 kb)

References

  1. Allen MF, Hipps LE (1984) Comparative microclimates of some mycorrhizal fungi: requirements for long-range dispersal of spores. Mycol Soc Am Newslett 35:17Google Scholar
  2. Bates D (2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 5(1):27–30Google Scholar
  3. Bennington CC, Thayne WV (1994) Use and misuse of mixed model analysis of variance in ecological studies. Ecology 75(3):717–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford JB, Lauenroth WK (2006) Controls over invasion of Bromus tectorum: the importance of climate, soil, disturbance and seed availability. J Veg Sci 17(6):693–704Google Scholar
  5. Burke MJW, Grime JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invisibility. Ecology 77(3):776–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers JC (2000) Seed movements and seedling fates in disturbed sagebrush steppe ecosystems: implications for restoration. Ecol Appl 10(5):1400–1413Google Scholar
  7. Chambers JC, MacMahon JA (1994) A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark GF, Johnston EL (2009) Propagule pressure and disturbance interact to overcome biotic resistance of marine invertebrate communities. Oikos 118(11):1679–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Antonio C, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87Google Scholar
  10. Davies KW, Sheley RL, Bates JD (2008) Does fall prescribed burning Artemisia tridentata steppe promote invasion or resistance to invasion after a recovery period? J Arid Env 72(6):1076–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DiTomaso JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48(2):255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiVittorio CT, Corbin JD, D’Antonio CM (2007) Spatial and temporal patterns of seed dispersal: an important determinant of grassland invasion. Ecol Appl 17(2):311–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Metheun, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Eschtruth AK, Battles JJ (2009) Assessing the relative importance of disturbance, herbivory, diversity, and propagule pressure in exotic plant invasion. Ecol Monogr 79(2):265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hempy-Mayer K, Pyke DA (2008) Defoliation effects on Bromus tectorum seed production: implications for grazing. Rangel Ecol Manag 61(1):116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirsch BT, Visser MD, Kays R, Jansen PA (2012) Quantifying seed dispersal kernels from truncated seed-tracking data. Methods Ecol Evol 3(3):595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hobbs RJ, Atkins L (1988) Effect of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Aust J Ecol 13(2):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston DB (2011) Movement of weed seeds in reclamation areas. Restor Ecol 19(4):446–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matlack GR (2005) Slow plants in a fast forest: local dispersal as a predictor of species frequencies in a dynamic landscape. J Ecol 93(1):50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melgoza G, Nowak RS, Tausch RJ (1990) Soil water exploitation after fire: competition between Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) and two native species. Oecologia 83(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monty A, Mahy G (2010) Evolution of dispersal traits along an invasion route in the wind-dispersed Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae). Oikos 119:1563–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nathan R, Schurr FM, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A (2008) Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends Ecol Evol 23(11):638–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinheiro J, Bates D, Debroy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2010) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package Ver. 3.1Google Scholar
  25. Prevéy J, Germino M, Huntly N, Inouye R (2010) Exotic plants increase and native plants decrease with loss of foundation species in sagebrush steppe. Plant Ecol 207(1):39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  27. Shinneman DJ, Baker WL (2009) Environmental and climatic variables as potential drivers of post-fire cover of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in seeded and unseeded semiarid ecosystems. Int J Wildland Fire 18:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomsen MA, D’Antonio CM, Suttle KB, Sousa WP (2006) Ecological resistance, seed density and their interactions determine patterns of invasion in a California coastal grassland. Ecol Lett 9(2):160–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Willson MF (1993) Dispersal mode, seed shadows, and colonization patterns. Plant Ecol 107–108(1):261–280Google Scholar
  30. Young JA, Allen FL (1997) Cheatgrass and range science: 1930–1950. J Range Manag 50(5):530–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnaud Monty
    • 1
  • Cynthia S. Brown
    • 2
  • Danielle B. Johnston
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, Gembloux Agro-Bio TechUniversity of LiègeGemblouxBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Colorado Division of Parks and WildlifeGrand JunctionUSA
  4. 4.Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations