Biological Invasions

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 885–897 | Cite as

Evidence of a climatic niche shift following North American introductions of two crane flies (Diptera; genus Tipula)

Original Paper


Ecological niche models assume a species niche should be conserved over space and time. Increasingly, studies have determined that niche shifts may occur during biological invasion events. The aim of this study is to examine niche conservation for two invasive crane flies, Tipula oleracea Linnaeus and Tipula paludosa Meigen, after introductions into North America. These species have broadly sympatric invasive distributions but differ in time since introduction and dispersal abilities. As these factors may impact the area accessible to dispersal, I examined the impact of background area delineation on conclusions of niche conservation. Results indicated that alternative delineations of accessible area (i.e., background area) had no affect on measures of niche equivalence. Neither Tipula species was found to be occupying invasive niche space equivalent to that of their native ranges. Niche dissimilarity was found for both species, with results strongly impacted by the choice of background area. T.paludosa introductions displayed a niche shift across both invasive introductions when the model area drew climatic information from an area that buffered occurrences by 40 km. The eastern T.oleracea introduction displayed a niche shift when background information was drawn from within a 400 km buffered area. This study suggests that invasive populations may be displaying a niche shift when evaluated against one scale of background but conserved when evaluated against another scale. Dispersal limitations for T. oleracea in its eastern introduction and anthropogenic habitat associations for T. paludosa across both invasive introductions are indicated as causes for the observed niche shifts. The results of this study highlight the importance of carefully delineating the area accessible to invasive species in studies of niche conservation. Furthermore, it indicates that examining several spatial extents of background areas can be beneficial when examining niche conservation for species in non-equilibrium states.


Invasion biology Ecological niche modeling Maxent Tipula oleracea Tipula paludosa Tipuloidea 


  1. Ackerly DD (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164:S165–S184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander CP (1942) Family Tipulidae. In: the diptera or true flies of connecticut. Part VI. Conn State Geol Nat Hist Surv Bull 64:196–509Google Scholar
  3. Alexander JM, Edwards PJ (2010) Limits to the niche and range margins of alien species. Oikos 119:1377–1386Google Scholar
  4. Anderson RP, Raza A (2010) The effect of the extent of study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. J Biogeogr 37:1378–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asche P, O’Connor P, Chandler PJ, Stubbs AE, Vane–Wright RI, Alexander KNA (2007) The craneflies (Diptera) of Ireland. Part 5 Tipulidae. Bull Ir Biogeogr Soc 31:296–357Google Scholar
  6. Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher S, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distributional modeling. Ecol Model 222:1810–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Thuiller W, Downey PO, Leishman MR, Hughes L (2009) Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Divers Distrib 15:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beirne BP (1971) Pest insects of annual crop plants in Canada. Mem Entomol Soc Can 78:1–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackshaw RP, Coll C (1999) Economically important leatherjackets of grassland and cereals: biology, impact and control. Integr Pest Manage Rev 4:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackshaw RP, Perry JN (1994) Predicting leatherjacket population frequencies in Northern Ireland. Ann Appl Biol 124:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brodo FA (1994) The subgenus Tipula (Tipula) in Finland and Estonia. Entomol Fennica 5:49–52Google Scholar
  12. Broennimann O, Guisan A (2008) Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biol Lett 4:585–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Müller–Schärer H, Thuiller W, Petersen AT, Guisan A (2007) Evidence of niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10:701–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butterfield J (1976) The response of development rate to temperature in the univoltine cranefly, Tipula subnodicornis Zetterstedt. Oecologia 25:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chefaui RM, Lobo JM (2008) Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecol Model 210:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coulson JC, Horobin JC, Butterfield J, Smith GRJ (1976) The maintenance of annual life-cycles in two species of Tipulidae (Diptera); a field study relating development, temperature and altitude. J Anim Ecol 45:215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Da Mata RA, Tidon R, Côrtes LG, de Marco P, Diniz-Filho JAF (2010) Invasive and flexible: niche shift in the drosophilid Zaprionus indianus (Insecta, Diptera). Biol Invasions 12:1231–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Marco P, Jr Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2008) Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion. Biol Lett 4:577–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolédec S, Chessel D, Gimaret-Carpentier C (2000) Niche separation in community analysis: a new method. Ecology 81:2914–2927Google Scholar
  20. Donald PF, Evens AD (2006) Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes. J Appl Ecol 43:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elith J, Leathwick J (2009) Conservation prioritisation using species distribution models. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (eds) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Perrier S, Guisan A (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distribution s from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S (2010) The art of modelling range-shifting species. Method Ecol Evol 1:330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fitzpatrick M, Weltzin J, Sanders N, Dunn R (2007) The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over–predict its native range? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox CJS (1957) Note on occurrence in Cape Breton Island of Tipula paludosa Mg. (Diptera: Tipulidae). Can Entomol 89:288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gelhaus JK (2006) The crane fly Tipula (Tipula) oleracea (Diptera: Tipulidae) reported from Michigan: a new pest of turfgrass for Eastern North America. Great Lakes Entomol 38:97–99Google Scholar
  28. Godsoe W (2010) Regional variation exaggerates ecological divergence in niche models. Syst Biol 59:298–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graham CH, Ron SR, Santos JC, Schneider CJ, Moritz C (2004) Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in Dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58:1781–1793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hadley M (1971) Pupation and fecundity of Molophilus ater Meigen (Diptera: Tiplidae) in relation to larval weight. Oecologica 7:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quan Biol 22:415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson DM, Campbell RL (1975) Biology of the European crane fly, Tipula paludosa Meigen, in Washington (Tipulidae; Diptera). Wash State Univ Tech Bull 81:1–23Google Scholar
  34. Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J (2008) Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 14:885–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LaGasa EH, Antonelli AL (2000) 1999 Western Washington Tipula oleracea survey (Diptera: Tipulidae). 1999 Entomology project report. Washington State Department of Agriculture Pub. 034Google Scholar
  36. Laughlin R (1960) Biology of Tipula oleracea L.: growth of the larva. Entomol Exp Appl 3:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laughlin R (1967) Biology of Tipula paludosa: growth of the larva in the field. Entomol Exp Appl 10:52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3883–3888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Libungan LA (2006) Vistfræði varmasmiðs (Carabus nemoralis) og folaflugu (Tipula paludosa). BSc Thesis, University of IcelandGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindroth CH (1957) The faunal connections between Europe and North America. Almqvist, WiksellGoogle Scholar
  41. Lobo JM (2008) More complex distribution models or more representative data? Biodivers Inform 5:14–19Google Scholar
  42. Loo WE, MacNally R, Lake PS (2007) Forecasting New Zealand mudsnail invasion range: model comparison using native and invaded ranges. Ecol Appl 17:181–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martínez–Meyer E, Peterson AT (2006) Conservatism of ecological niche characteristics in North American plant species over the Pleistocene–to–Recent transition. J Biogeogr 33:1779–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mau–Crimmins TM, Schussman H, Geiger EL (2006) Can the invaded range of a species be predicted sufficiently using only native–range data? Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana) in the southwestern United States. Ecol Model 193:736–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCracken EI, Roster GF, Kelly A (1995) Factors affecting the size of leatherjackets (Diptera: Tipulidae) populations in pastures in the west of Scotland. Appl Soil Ecol 2:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meats A (1975) The developmental dynamics of Tipula paludosa and the relation of climate to its growth pattern, flight season and geographical distribution. Oecologia 19:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Medley KA (2010) Niche shifts during the global invasion of Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Myers JH, Iyer R (1981) Phenotypic and genetic characteristics of the European crane-fly, its introduction and spread in Western North America. J Anim Ecol 50:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin CF (2008) Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23:149–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peck DC, Hoebeke ER, Klass C (2006) Detection and establishment of European crane flies Tipula paludosa Meigen and Tipula oleracea L. (Diptera: Tipulidae) in New York: a review of their distribution, invasion history, biology, and recognition. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 108:985–994Google Scholar
  52. Peck DC, Olmstead DO, Petersen MJ (2010) Pest status of invasive crane flies in New York turfgrass and the repercussions for regional plant protection. J Integr Pest Manag 1:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Petersen MJ, Olmstead DL, Peck DC (2011) Best management practices for invasive crane flies in Northeastern United States sod production. J Integr Pest Manag 2:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species’ invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78:419–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterson AT (2011) Ecological niche conservatism: a time-structured review of evidence. J Biogeogr 38:817–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA (2001) Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. Bioscience 51:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Petitpierre B, Kueffer C, Broennimann O, Randin C, Daehler C, Guisan A (2012) Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science 16:1344–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phillips SJ (2008) Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence–only modeling: a response to Peterson et al. (2007). Ecography 31:272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prentis PJ, Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM, Lowe AJ (2008) Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci 13:288–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol Lett 3:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rödder D, Schmidtlein S, Veith M, Lötters S (2010) Alien invasive slider turtle in unpredicted habitat: a matter of niche shift or predictors studied? PLoS ONE 4:e7843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Romesburg HC (1985) Exploring, confirming and randomization tests. Comput Geosci 11:19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Salmela J (2001) Adult craneflies (Diptera, Nematocera) around springs in southern Finland. Entomol Fennica 12:139–152Google Scholar
  66. Schoener TW (1968) Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fuana. Ecology 49:704–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schulte U, Hochkirch A, Lötters S, Rödder D, Schweiger S, Weimann T, Veith M (2012) Cryptic niche conservatism among evolutionary lineages of an invasive lizard. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:198–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simard L, Brodeur J, Gelhaus J (2006) Emergence of a new turfgrass insect pest on golf courses in Quebec, the European crane fly (Diptera: Tipulidae). Phytoprotection 87:43–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simova D (1959) Contributions to the knowledge of the Tipulidae and Limoniidae of Macedonia. Fragm Balc Mus Maced Sci Nat 15:125–135Google Scholar
  70. Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodivers Inform 2:1–10Google Scholar
  71. Taschereau É (2007) Écologie saisonnière de la tipule européenne (Diptère : Tipulidae), insecte ravageur des graminées à gazon sur les terrains de golf de la région de Québec. MSc thesis, Universite Laval, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  72. Theowald B (1984) Taxonomie, Phylogenie und Biogeographie der Untergattung Tipula (Tipula) Linnaeus 1758 (Insecta, Diptera, Tipulidae) Tijdschr Entomol 127:33–78Google Scholar
  73. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M (2005) Niche–based modeling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Change Biol 11:2234–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Umble JR, Rao S (2004) Exotic Tipula paludosa and T. oleracea (Diptera: Tipulidae) in the United States: geographic distribution in Western Oregon. Pan Pac Entomol 80:42–52Google Scholar
  75. Václavik T, Meentemeyer RK (2012) Equilibrium or not? Modelling potential distribution of invasive species in different stages of invasion. Divers Distrib 18:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Václavik T, Kupfer JA, Meentemeyer RK (2011) Accounting for multi-scale spatial autocorrelation improves performance of invasive species distribution modelling (iSDM). J Biogeogr 39:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62:2868–2883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2010) ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Welk E (2004) Constraints in range predictions of invasive plant species due to non–equilibrium distribution patterns: purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. Ecol Model 179:551–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wiens JJ, Graham CH (2005) Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:519–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilkinson ATS, MacCarthy HR (1967) The marsh crane fly, Tipula paludosa Mg, a new pest in British Colombia (Diptera: Tipulidae). J Entomol Soc BC 64:29–34Google Scholar
  82. Young CW, Onore G, Proano K (1999) First occurrence of Tipula (Tipula) oleracea Linnaeus (Diptera: Tipulidae) in the New World, with biological notes. J Kans Entomol Soc 72:226–232Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyCornell UniversityGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations