Biological Invasions

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 429–445 | Cite as

The complex interaction network among multiple invasive bird species in a cavity-nesting community

  • Yotam Orchan
  • François Chiron
  • Assaf Shwartz
  • Salit Kark
Original Paper

Abstract

Alien invasive species have detrimental effects on invaded communities. Aliens do not invade a vacuum, but rather a community consisting of native and often other alien species. Our current understanding of the pathways and network of interactions among multiple invasive species within whole communities is limited. Eradication efforts often focus on a single target species, potentially leading to unexpected outcomes on interacting non-target species. We aimed to examine the interaction network in a cavity-nesting community consisting of native and invasive birds. We studied the nesting cavities in the largest urban park in Israel over two breeding seasons. We found evidence for a complex interaction network that includes negative, neutral and positive interactions, but no synergistic positive interactions among aliens. Three major factors shaped the interaction network: breeding timing, nesting preferences and the ability to excavate or widen the cavities, which were found to be a limited resource. Cavity enlargement by the early-breeding invasive rose-ringed parakeet may enhance breeding of the invasive common myna in previously unavailable holes. The myna excludes the smaller invasive vinous-breasted starling, a direct competitor of the primary nest excavator, the native Syrian woodpecker. Therefore, management and eradication efforts directed towards the common myna alone may actually release the vinous-breasted starling from competitive exclusion by the common myna, increasing the negative impact of the vinous-breasted starling on the native community. As found here, interactions among multiple alien species can be crucial in shaping invasion success and should be carefully considered when aiming to effectively manage biological invasions.

Keywords

Biological invasions Biotic homogenization Cavity network Common myna Invasion meltdown Invasive birds Multi-species interactions Rose-ringed parakeet Urban park 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank E. Banker, R. Ben-David, S. Darawshi, O. Hatzofe, T. Kahn, N. Melamed, and N. Sapir for their help in the field, N. Levin for help with GIS, the Yarkon Park management and workers and especially Z. Lapid for their cooperation. Richard Fuller, John Kappes, Jr., Walter Koenig, John Maron and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper. Last, but not least, our thanks to all the bird-watchers who helped us in the bird and cavity surveys and especially to H. Katz and the children from the Ga’ash School of Environmental Studies for their help in field work. This work was supported by grants to S. Kark from the Israel Ministry of Science and Technology.

References

  1. Aitken KEH, Martin K (2008) Resource selection plasticity and community responses to experimental reduction of a critical resource. Ecology 89:971–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albano DJ (1992) Nesting mortality of Carolina chickadees breeding in natural cavities. Condor 94:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstrom DM, Lucieer A, Kiefer K, Wasley J, Belbin L, Pedersen TK, Chown SL (2009) Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Island. J Appl Ecol 46:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanc LA, Walters JR (2007) Cavity-nesting community webs as predictive tools: where do we go from here? J Ornithol 148:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanc LA, Walters JR (2008) Cavity excavation and enlargement as mechanisms for indirect interactions in an avian community. Ecology 89:506–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanvillain C, Salducci JM, Tutururai G, Maeura M (2003) Impact of introduced birds on the recovery of the Tahiti Flycatcher (Pomarea nigra), a critically endangered forest bird of Tahiti. Biol Conserv 109:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielberger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL (1993) Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2004) Advanced distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, DordrecthGoogle Scholar
  11. Case TJ (1996) Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biol Conserv 78:69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caut S, Casanovas JG, Virgos E, Lozano J, Witmer GW, Courchamp F (2007) Rats dying for mice: modeling the competitor release effect. Aust Ecol 32:858–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caut S, Angulo E, Courchamp F (2009) Avoiding surprise effects on Surprise Island: alien species control in a multitrophic level perspective. Biol Invas 11:1689–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiron F, Shirley S, Kark S (2009) Human-related processes drive the richness of exotic birds in Europe. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Courchamp F, Langlais M, Sugihara G (1999) Cats protecting birds: modelling the mesopredator release effect. J Anim Ecol 68:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Courchamp F, Langlais M, Sugihara G (2000) Rabbits killing birds: modelling the hyperpredation process. J Anim Ecol 69:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Courchamp F, Chapuis JL, Pascal M (2003) Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biol Rev 78:347–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1994) The birds of the western palearctic, vol IX. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Crooks KR, Soulé ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Currie D, Fanchette R, Millett J, Hoareau C, Shah NJ (2004) The breeding biology of the critically endangered Seychelles scops-owl Otus insularis: consequences for conservation and management. Bird Conserv Int 14:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies ZG, Fuller RA, Loram A, Irvine KN, Sims V, Gaston KJ (2009) A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biol Conserv 142:761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dhanda SK, Dhindsa MS (1996) Breeding performance of Indian Myna Acridotheres tristis in nestboxes and natural sites. Ibis 138:788–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drever MC, Aitken KEH, Norris AR, Martin K (2008) Woodpeckers as reliable indicators of bird richness, forest health and harvest. Biol Conserv 141:624–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elmhagen B, Rushton SP (2007) Trophic control of mesopredators in terrestrial ecosystems: top down or bottom up? Ecol Lett 10:197–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by plants and animals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Everitt BS, Landau SYL (2001) Cluster analysis. Arnold Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Feare C, Craig A (1999) Starlings and mynas. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisher RJ, Wiebe KL (2006) Nest site attributes and temporal patterns of northern flicker nest loss: effects of predation and competition. Oecologia 147:744–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grosholz ED (2005) Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hatzofe O, Yom-Tov Y (2002) Global warming and recent changes in Israel’s avifauna note. Israel J Zool 48:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodge S, Arthur W (1996) Contramensal interactions between species. Oikos 77:371–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holzapfel C, Levin N, Hatzofe O, Kark S (2006) Colonisation of the Middle East by the invasive Common Myna Acridotheres tristis L., with special reference to Israel. Sandgrouse 28:44–45Google Scholar
  34. Kappes JJ Jr, Davis JM (2008) Evidence of positive indirect effects within a community of cavity-nesting vertebrates. The Condor 110:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kark S, Iwaniuk A, Schalimtzek A, Banker E (2007) Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter’? J Biogeogr 34:638–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koenig WD (2003) European starlings and their effect on native cavity-nesting birds. Conserv Biol 17:1134–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kotagama SW, Dunnet GM (2007) Behavioral activities of the Rose-ringed Parakeet Psittacula krameri in the wild. Siyoth 2:51–57Google Scholar
  38. Le Corre M (2008) Cats, rats and seabirds. Nature 451:134–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lin RS (2001) The occurrence, distribution and relative abundance of exotic starlings and mynas in Taiwan. Endemic Species Res 3:13–23Google Scholar
  41. Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8:133–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin K, Eadie JM (1999) Nest webs: a community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds. For Ecol Manage 115:243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martin K, Aitken KEH, Wiebe KL (2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: nest characteristics and niche partitioning. The Condor 106:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moulton MP, Pimm SL (1983) The introduced Hawaiian avifauna: biogeographic evidence for competition. Am Natur 121:669–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newton I (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biol Conserv 70:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nuñez MA, Relva MA, Simberloff D (2008) Enemy release or invasional meltdown? Deer preference for exotic and native trees on Isla Victoria, Argentina. Austral Ecol 33:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orchan YT (2007) The cavity-nesting bird community in the Yarkon Park: spatial interactions, temporal interactions and breeding success in a community being invaded in recent decades. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (MSc Thesis)Google Scholar
  50. Paclik M, Weidinger K (2007) Microclimate of tree cavities during winter nights—implications for roost site selection in birds. Int J Biometeorol 51:287–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Palomares F, Gaona P, Ferreras P, Delibes M (1995) Positive effects on game species of top predators by controlling smaller predator populations: an example with lynx, mongooses, and rabbits. Conserv Biol 9:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pell AS, Tidemann CR (1997) The impact of two exotic hollow-nesting birds on two native parrots in savannah and woodland in eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 79:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pithon JA, Dytham C (1999) Breeding performance of Ring-necked Parakeets Psittacula krameri in small introduced populations in southeast England. Bird Study 46:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rayner MJ, Hauber ME, Imber MJ, Stamp RK, Clout MN (2007) Spatial heterogeneity of mesopredator release within an oceanic island system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:20862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Remm J, Lohmus A, Remm K (2006) Tree cavities in riverine forests: what determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? For Ecol Manage 221:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rendell WB, Robertson RJ (1989) Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for Tree Swallows breeding in natural cavities. The Condor 91:875–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Richardson DM (2004) Plant invasion ecology—dispatches from the front line. Divers Distrib 10:315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ritchie EG, Johnson CN (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett 12:982–998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Romanuk TN, Zhou Y, Brose U, Berlow EL, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2009) Predicting invasion success in complex ecological networks. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:1743–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rothschild M, Clay T (1952) Fleas, flukes, and cukoos. Collins, St James’ Place, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruscoe WA, Ramsey DSL, Pech RP, Sweetapple PJ, Yockney I, Barron MC, Perry M, Nugent G, Carran R, Warne R, Brausch C, Duncan RP (2011) Unexpected consequences of control: competitive vs. predator release in a four-species assemblage of invasive mammals. Ecol Lett 14:1035–1042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH, Bruno JF, Dawson MN, Gaines SD, Grosberg RK, Hastings A, Holt RD, Mayfield MM, O’Connor MI, Rice WR (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:465–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shirihai H, Dovrat E, Christie DA (1996) The birds of Israel. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Shirley SM, Kark S (2009) The role of species traits and taxonomic patterns in alien bird impacts. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shwartz A, Shirley S, Kark S (2008) How do habitat variability and management regime shape the spatial heterogeneity of birds within a large Mediterranean urban park? Landscape Urban Plan 84:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shwartz A, Strubbe D, Butler CJ, Matthysen E, Kark S (2009) The effect of enemy release and climate conditions on invasive birds: a regional test using the rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) as a case study. Divers Distrib 15:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simberloff D, Boecklen W (1991) Patterns of extinction in the introduced Hawaiian avifauna: a reexamination of the role of competition. Am Natur 138:300–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invas 1:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Soulé ME, Bolger DT, Alberts AC, Wright J, Sorice M, Hill S (1988) Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conserv Biol 2:75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stohlgren TJ, Barnett DT, Kartesz JT (2003) The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Front Ecol Environ 1:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strubbe D, Matthysen E (2007) Invasive ring necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in Belgium: habitat selection and impact on native birds. Ecography 30:578–588Google Scholar
  73. Sweetapple PJ, Nugent G (2007) Ship rat demography and diet following possum control in a mixed podocarp-hardwood forest. N Z J Ecol 31:186–201Google Scholar
  74. Thorpe AS, Aschehoug ET, Atwater DZ, Callaway RM (2011) Interactions among plants and evolution. J Ecol 99:729–740Google Scholar
  75. Tompkins DM, Veltman CJ (2006) Unexpected consequences of vertebrate pest control: predictions from a four-species community model. Ecol Appl 16:1050–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Trewby ID, Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ, Walker N, Young R, Davison J, Cheeseman C, Robertson PA, Gorman ML, McDonald RA (2008) Experimental evidence of competitive release in sympatric carnivores. Biol Lett 4:170–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Balen JH, Booy CJH, Van Franeker JA, Osieck ER (1982) Studies on hole nesting birds in natural nest sites. Ardea 70:1–24Google Scholar
  78. Vollrath F (1984) Kleptobiotic interactions in invertebrates. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers: strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Croom-Helm, London, pp 61–94Google Scholar
  79. Wesolowski T (2002) Anti-predator adaptations in nesting Marsh Tits Parus palustris: the role of nest site security. Ibis 144:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wesolowski T (2007) Lessons from long-term hole-nester studies in a primeval temperate forest. J Ornithol 148:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiebe KL (2001) Microclimate of tree cavity nests: is it important for reproductive success in Northern Flickers? Auk 118:412–421Google Scholar
  82. Wiebe KL, Koenig WD, Martin K (2007) Costs and benefits of nest reuse versus excavation in cavity-nesting birds. Ann Zool Fenn 44:209–217Google Scholar
  83. Winkler H (1973) Nahrungserwerb und Konkurrenz des Blutspechts, Picoides (Dendrocopos) syriacus. Oecologia 12(2):193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, vol 564. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  85. Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (2001) Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol Evol 16:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yotam Orchan
    • 1
    • 2
  • François Chiron
    • 1
    • 3
  • Assaf Shwartz
    • 1
    • 3
  • Salit Kark
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.The Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Silberman Institute Life SciencesThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.The Movement Ecology Lab, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Silberman Institute Life SciencesThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem JerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Conservation des Espèces, Restauration et Suivi des PopulationsUMR 7204 MNHN-CNRS-UPMCParisFrance
  4. 4.ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations