Biological Invasions

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 309–313 | Cite as

Natural born killers: an invasive amphipod is predatory throughout its life-history

  • Jaimie T. A. Dick
  • Mhairi E. Alexander
  • Calum MacNeil
Original Paper

Abstract

Introduced predators can have profound impacts on prey populations, with subsequent ramifications throughout entire ecosystems. However, studies of predator–prey interaction strengths in community and food-web analyses focus on adults or use average body sizes. This ignores ontogenetic changes, or lack thereof, in predatory capabilities over the life-histories of predators. Additionally, large individual predators might not be physically capable of consuming very small prey individuals. Both situations are important to resolve, as native prey may or may not therefore experience ontogenetic or size refuges from invasive predators. Here, we find that the freshwater amphipod invader, Gammarus pulex, is predatory throughout its development from juvenile through to adult. All size classes collected in the field had a common prey, nymphs of the mayfly Baetis rhodani, in their guts. In an experiment with predator, prey and experimental arenas scaled for body size, G. pulex juveniles and adults consumed B. rhodani in all size-matched categories. In a second experiment, the largest G. pulex individuals were able to prey on the smallest B. rhodani. Thus, the prey do not benefit from any ontogenetic or size refuge from the predator. This corroborates with the known negative population abundance relationships between this invasive predator and its native prey species. Understanding and predicting invasive predator impacts will be best served when interactions among all life-history stages of predator and prey are considered.

Keywords

Amphipod Community impacts Invasive species Ontogeny Predation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Natural Environment Research Council for funding, Chris Harrod for advice and the two referees for constructive comments.

References

  1. Bollache L, Dick JTA, Farnsworth KD, Montgomery WI (2008) Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biol Lett 4:166–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cereghino R (2006) Ontogenetic diet shifts and their incidence on ecological processes: a case study using two morphologically similar stoneflies (Plecoptera). Acta Oecol 30:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox JG, Lima SL (2006) Naivete and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol Evol 21:674–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dick JTA (2008) Role of behaviour in biological invasions and species distributions; lessons from interactions between the invasive Gammarus pulex and the native G. duebeni (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Contrib Zool 77:91–98Google Scholar
  5. Dick JTA, Elwood RW (1993) The mating system of Gammarus pulex: a negligible role for micro-habitat segregation. Anim Behav 45:188–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dick JTA, Platvoet D, Kelly DW (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader, Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1078–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dick JTA, Armstrong M, Clarke HC, Farnsworth KD, Hatcher MJ, Ennis M, Kelly A, Dunn AM (2010) Parasitism may enhance rather than reduce the predatory impact of an invader. Biol Lett 6:636–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Juliano SA (2001) Non-linear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 178–196Google Scholar
  9. Kelly DW, Dick JTA, Montgomery WI (2002) Predation on mayfly nymph, Baetis rhodani, by native and introduced Gammarus: direct effects and the facilitation of salmonid predation. Freshw Biol 47:1257–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelly DW, Bailey RJE, MacNeil C, Dick JTA, McDonald RA (2006) Invasion by the amphipod Gammarus pulex alters community composition of native freshwater macroinvertebrates. Divers Distrib 12:525–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Layman CA, Arrington DA, Montaña CG, Post DM (2007) Can stable isotope ratios provide for community-wide measures of trophic structure? Ecology 88:42–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lipcius RN, Hines AH (1986) Variable functional responses of a marine predator in dissimilar homogenous microhabitats. Ecology 67:1361–1371Google Scholar
  13. MacNeil C, Dick JTA, Elwood RW (1997) The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus (Crustacea: Amphipoda); problems and perspectives concerning the Functional Feeding Group concept. Biol Rev 72:349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacNeil C, Platvoet D, Dick JTA, Fielding N, Constable A, Hall N, Aldridge D, Renals T, Diamond M (2010) The Ponto-Caspian ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky 1894), invades the British Isles. Aquat Invasion 5:441–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCarthy ID, Waldron S (2000) Identifying migratory Salmo trutta using carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 14:1325–1331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:269–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Urban MC (2007) The growth-predation risk trade-off under a growing gape-limited predation threat. Ecology 88:2587–2597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Riel MC, van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, Marguillier S, Dehairs F, de Vaate AB (2006) Trophic relationships in the Rhine food web during invasion and after establishment of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus. Hydrobiologia 565:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wanink JH, Joordens JCA (2007) Dietary shifts in Brycinus sadleri (Pisces: Characidae) from southern Lake Victoria. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 10:392–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Woodward G, Warren P (2007) Body size and predatory interactions in freshwaters: scaling from individuals to communities. In: Hildrew AG, Raffaelli DG, Edmonds-Brown R (eds) Body size: the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 98–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaimie T. A. Dick
    • 1
  • Mhairi E. Alexander
    • 1
  • Calum MacNeil
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations