Abstract
The exotic macrophyte species Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. is widely dispersed, mainly through stem fragments and rhizomes, in shallow littoral zones in which uniform canopy conditions are created by the pre-existing resident wetland plant species. Therefore, interactions between these two types of asexual propagules and the resident species may occur during the early establishment and growth phases of M. aquaticum. We tested the hypothesis that the establishment and growth of M. aquaticum are affected by three factors: the number of propagules supplied, the presence of a standing biomass of Carex japonica Thunb. and the presence of thick litter layers in the littoral zone. M. aquaticum rhizomes and stem fragments were introduced into a standing biomass of C. japonica in mesocosms using two types of sediments (littoral and sand-clay) and two propagule supply levels. After 4 months, the survival rates of both the rhizomes and stem fragments were high under all of the experimental treatments. The propagule supply positively affected the survival rates and growth of M. aquaticum. The survival of the rhizomes was unaffected by the presence of either C. japonica or littoral sediments, whereas the survival of the stem fragments was reduced by the presence of C. japonica. The presence of litter layers is a primary factor facilitating the growth of M. aquaticum propagules because of the high nutrient content of the litter. In addition, the presence of the standing C. japonica biomass and newly growing Eleocharis yokoscensis (Franch.et Sav.) Tang et Wang (a small ruderal species that, unexpectedly, grew rapidly following the removal of the standing biomass of C. japonica) reduced the growth of the M. aquaticum stem fragments and rhizomes, respectively. Our findings suggest that the loss of vegetative cover resulting from intense cattle herbivory and other factors in littoral zones may accelerate the invasion of M. aquaticum. An effective approach for preventing M. aquaticum invasion is to reduce the propagule supply and prevent propagules from dispersing.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken SG (1981) A conspectus of Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in North America. Brittonia 33:57–69
Barko JW, Smart RM (1981) Comparative influences of light and temperature on the growth and metabolism of selected submersed freshwater macrophytes. Ecol Monogr 51:219–236
Barrat-Segretain MH (2005) Competition between invasive and indigenous species: impact of spatial pattern and developmental stage. Plant Ecol 180:153–160
Boedeltje G, Bakker JP, Bekker RM, Van Groenendael JM, Soesbergen M (2003) Plant dispersal in a lowland stream in relation to occurrence and three specific life-history traits of the species in the species pool. J Ecol 91:855–866
Bray RH, Kurz LT (1945) Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45
Britton-Simmons KH, Abbott KC (2008) Short- and long-term effects of disturbance and propagule pressure on a biological invasion. J Ecol 96:68–77
Chadwell TB, Engelhardt KAM (2008) Effects of pre-existing submersed vegetation and propagule pressure on the invasion success of Hydrilla verticillata. J Appl Ecol 45:515–523
Chase JM, Knight TM (2006) Effects of eutrophication and snails on Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) invasion. Biol Invasions 8:1643–1649
Chun YJ, van Kleunen M, Dawson W (2010) The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: linking damage to performance. Ecol Lett 13:937–946
Clark GF, Johnston EL (2009) Propagule pressure and disturbance interact to overcome biotic resistance of marine invertebrate communities. Oikos 118:1679–1686
Daehler C (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183–211
Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534
Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Gemmell NJ, Rand TA, Ewers RM (2007) Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol 22:489–496
Dong BC, Yu GL, Guo W, Zhang MX, Dong M, Yu FH (2010a) How internode length, position and presence of leaves affect survival and growth of Alternanthera philoxeroides after fragmentation? Evol Ecol 24:1447–1461
Dong BC, Zhang MX, Alpert P, Lei GC, Yu FH (2010b) Effects of orientation on survival and growth of small fragments of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. PLoS One 5:e13631
Dong BC, Alpert P, Guo W, Yu FH (2012) Effects of fragmentation on the survival and growth of the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Biol Invasions 14:1101–1110
Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80
Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Wiley, New York, USA
Funk J, Vitousek P (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446:1079–1081
Hermans C, Hammond JP, White PJ, Verbruggen N (2006) How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends Plant Sci 11:610–617
Hood WG, Naiman RJ (2000) Vulnerability of riparian zones to invasion by exotic vascular plants. Plant Ecol 148:105–114
Hussner A (2009) Growth and photosynthesis of four invasive aquatic plant species in Europe. Weed Res 49:506–515
Hussner A, Meyer C, Busch J (2009) The influence of water level and nutrient availability on growth and root system development of Myriophyllum aquaticum. Weed Res 49:73–80
Jacono CC, Richerson MM (2008) Myriophyllum spicatum. In: USGS nonindigenous aquatic species database, Gainesville, FL. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=237. Accessed: 26 April 2012
Jia X, Pan XY, Li B, Chen JK, Yang XZ (2009) Allometric growth, disturbance regime, and dilemmas of controlling in invasive plants: a model analysis. Biol Invasions 11:743–752
Kreyling J, Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein C (2011) Stochastic trajectories of succession initiated by extreme climatic events. Ecol Lett 14:758–764
Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989
Liu C, Yu D (2009) The bud and root sprouting capacity of Alternanthera philoxeroides after over-wintering on sediments of a drained canal. Hydrobiologia 623:251–256
Liu J, Dong M, Miao SL, Li ZY, Song MH, Wang RQ (2006) Invasive alien plants in China: role of clonality and geographical origin. Biol Invasions 8:1461–1470
Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228
Lozon JD, MacIsaac HJ (1997) Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? Environ Rev 5:131–144
Melbourne BA, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone AL, Hall RJ, Harrison S, Hastings A, Holland M (2007) Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol Lett 10:77–94
Okada M, Grewell BJ, Jasieniuk M (2009) Clonal spread of invasive Ludwigia hexapetala and L. grandiflora in freshwater wetlands of California. Aquat Bot 91:123–129
Pyšek P, Richardson D (2007) Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: Nentwig W (ed) Biol invasions. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 97–125
Riis T, Sand-Jensen K (2006) Dispersal of plant fragments in small streams. Freshw Biol 51:274–286
Ruiz GM, Fofonoff P, Hines AH, Grosholz ED (1999) Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: assessing invasion impacts and interactions. Limnol Oceanogr 44:950–972
Sanders NJ, Weltzin JF, Crutsinger GM, Fitzpatrick MC, Nuñez MA, Oswalt CM, Lane KE (2007) Insects mediate the effects of propagule supply and resource availability on a plant invasion. Ecology 88:2383–2391
Santamaría L (2002) Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecol 23:137–154
Sarneel J (2012) The dispersal capacity of vegetative propagules of riparian fen species. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1022-3
Sheppard AW, Shaw RH, Sforza R (2005) Top 20 environmental weeds for classical biological control in Europe: a review of opportunities regulations and other barriers to adoption. Weed Res 46:93–117
Silvertown J (2008) The evolutionary maintenance of sexual reproduction: evidence from the ecological distribution of asexual reproduction in clonal plants. Int J Plant Sci 169:157–168
Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102
Smith DH, Madsen JD, Dickson KL, Beitinger TL (2002) Nutrient effects on autofragmentation of Myriophyllum spicatum. Aquat Bot 74:1–17
Sutton DL (1985) Biology and ecology of Myriophyllum aquaticum. In: Proceeding, 1st international symposium on watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and related haloragaceae species. Vancouver, BC, pp 59–71
Sytsma MD, Anderson LWJ (1993a) Biomass, nitrogen, and phosphorus allocation in parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum). J Aquat Plant Manag 31:244–248
Sytsma MD, Anderson LWJ (1993b) Transpiration by an emergent macrophyte: source of water and implications for nutrient supply. Hydrobiologia 271:97–108
Tanentzap AJ, Bazely DR (2009) Propagule pressure and resource availability determine plant community invisibility in a temperate forest understorey. Oikos 118:300–308
Thiébaut G (2007) Invasion success of non-indigenous aquatic and semi-aquatic plants in their native and introduced ranges. A comparison between their invasiveness in North America and in France. Biol Invasions 9:1–12
Vilà M, Weiner J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species?—Evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105:229–238
Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499
Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–3218
Wersal RM, Madsen JD (2011a) Comparative effects of water level variations on growth characteristics of Myriophyllum aquaticum. Weed Res 51:386–393
Wersal RM, Madsen JD (2011b) Influences of water column nutrient loading on growth characteristics of the invasive aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. Hydrobiologia 665:93–105
Wersal RM, Cheshier JC, Madsen JD, Gerard PD (2011) Phenology, starch allocation, and environmental effects on Myriophyllum aquaticum. Aquat Bot 95:194–199
Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London
Wright JT, Davis AR (2006) Demographic feedback between clonal growth and fragmentation in an invasive seaweed. Ecology 87:1744–1754
Xie Y, Li Z, Gregg WP, Li D (2001) Invasive species in China-an overview. Biodivers Conserv 10:1317–1341
Xie Y, Luo W, Ren B, Li F (2007) Morphological and physiological responses to sediment type and light availability in roots of the submerged plant Myriophyllum spicatum. Ann Bot 100:1517–1523
Xie D, Yu D, Yu LF, Liu CH (2010) Asexual propagations of introduced exotic macrophytes Elodea nuttallii, Myriophyllum aquaticum, and M. propinquum are improved by nutrient-rich sediments in China. Hydrobiologia 655:37–47
Zhang Y–Y, Zhang D-Y, Barrett SCH (2010) Genetic uniformity characterizes the invasive spread of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), a clonal aquatic plant. Mol Ecol 19:1774–1786
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Ling-fei Yu, Hui Wang, Shu-feng Fan and Jin-ning Zhu for laboratory/field assistance and helpful discussions. We also greatly appreciate two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an early version of the manuscript. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30930011 and 31170339).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, D., Yu, D., You, WH. et al. The propagule supply, litter layers and canopy shade in the littoral community influence the establishment and growth of Myriophyllum aquaticum . Biol Invasions 15, 113–123 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0272-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0272-3


