Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climate suitability and human influences combined explain the range expansion of an invasive horticultural plant

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological niche models are commonly used to identify regions at risk of species invasions. Relying on climate alone may limit a model’s success when additional variables contribute to invasion. While a climate-based model may predict the future spread of an invasive plant, we hypothesized that a model that combined climate with human influences would most successfully explain its present distribution. We used the ecological niche model MaxEnt to test our hypothesis with Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), a common invasive horticultural plant in the United States. We first predicted the future range expansion of the species in the United States using a model that was trained on the climate conditions in its native range. We then tested the ability of a climate-based model, which was trained on climate conditions in the invaded range, to predict the current distribution in the United States. Finally, we tested whether including a measure of human influence would improve this model. Our results indicate that, despite L. japonica’s 200-year invasion history, it is expected to spread beyond its current US range. Climate and human influence combined explain the current distribution. Modeling the spread of invasive horticultural plants using climate alone risks under-predicting areas with poor climates and high human influence. Therefore, planting invasive horticultural species should be discouraged as even suboptimal climates may result in further range expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen P, Wiley EO, Mcnyset KM (2007) Ecological niche modeling as a predictive tool: silver and bighead carps in North America. Biol Invasions 9:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christen DC, Matlack GR (2009) The habitat and conduit functions of roads in the spread of three invasive plant species. Biol Invasions 11:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M (2007) A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Divers Distrib 13:527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenburg LR, Whigham DF, Teramura AH, Forseth IN (1993) Effects of below- and aboveground competition from the vines Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia on the growth of the tree host Liquidambar styraciflua. Oecologia 93:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Bossenbroek JM (2004) The potential distribution of zebra mussels in the United States. Bioscience 54:931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew J, Anderson N, Andow D (2010) Conundrums of a complex vector for invasive species control: a detailed examination of the horticultural industry. Biol Invasion 12:2837–2851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop EA, Wilson JC, Mackey AP (2006) The potential geographic distribution of the invasive weed Senna obtusifolia in Australia. Weed Res 46:404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation for MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Miaud C (2007) Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species—the American bullfrog. Divers Distrib 13:476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Padoa-Schioppa E (2009) From introduction to the establishment of alien species: bioclimatic differences between presence and reproduction localities in the slider turtle. Divers Distrib 15:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt RA (1986) Japanese honeysuckle: from “one of the best” to ruthless pest. Arnoldia 46:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29:773–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadoya T, Ishii HS, Kikuchi R, Suda S, Washitani I (2009) Using monitoring data gathered by volunteers to predict the potential distribution of the invasive alien bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Biol Conserv 142:1011–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilkenny FF (2011) Gene flow and adaptation in Lonicera japonica. PhD dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

  • Leatherman AD (1955) Ecological life-history of Lonicera japonica Thunb. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

  • Lemke D, Hulme PE, Brown JA, Tadesse W (2011) Distribution modeling of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) invasion in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountain Region, USA. Forest Ecol Manag 262:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S, Oberdorff T, Brosse S (2008) Fish invasions in the world’s river systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities. PLoS Biol 6:404–410

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993a) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8:133–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993b) Species invasions and deletions: community effects and responses to climate and habitat change. In: Karieva PM, Kingsolver JG, Huey RB (eds) Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 367–387

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2001) Effects of human population, area, and time on non-native plant and fish diversity in the United States. Biol Conserv 100:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minton MS, Mack RN (2010) Naturalization of plant populations: the role of cultivation and population size and density. Oecologia 164:399–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo V (1997) Element stewardship abstract for Lonicera japonica. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison RR, Mack RN (2008) Potential distribution of the invasive tree Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae) in the United States: evaluating CLIMEX predictions with field trials. Glob Change Biol 14:813–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton RW, Liu H (2009) Marketing time predicts naturalization of horticultural plants. Ecology 90:69–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Robins CR (2003) Using ecological-niche modeling to predict barred owl invasions with implications for spotted owl conservation. Conserv Biol 17:1161–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Papes M, Kluza DA (2003) Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Sci 51:863–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ (2008) Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: a response to Peterson et al. (2007). Ecography 31:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ (2010) A brief tutorial on MaxEnt. Lesson Conserv 3:107–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Wild J, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S et al (2010) Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12157–12162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51:103–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Iponga DM, Roura-Pascual N, Krug RM, Milton SJ, Hughes GO et al (2010) Accommodating scenarios of climate change and management in modeling the distribution of the invasive tree Schinus molle in South Africa. Ecography 33:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roura-Pascual N, Hui C, Ikeda T, Leday G, Richardson DM, Carpintero S, Espadaler X et al (2011) Relative roles of climatic suitability and anthropogenic influence in determining the pattern of spread in a global invader. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:220–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bio Sci 52:891–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Schierenbeck K (2004) Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) as an invasive species; history, ecology, and context. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:391–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skulman BW, Mattice JD, Cain MD, Gbur EE (2004) Evidence for allelopathic interference of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) to loblolly and shortleaf pine regeneration. Weed Sci 52:433–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND (2008) The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions. Mol Ecol 17:351–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan JJ, Williams PA, Cameron EK, Timmons SM (2004) People and time explain the distribution of naturalized plants in New Zealand. Weed Technol 18:1330–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Procheş Ş, Wilson JRU (2006) Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87:1755–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC, Phillips BL, Skelly DK, Shine R (2007) The cane toad’s (Chaunus [Bufo] marinus) increasing ability to invade Australia is revealed by a dynamically updated range model. Proc R Soc B 274:1413–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2009) Natural resources conservation service plants profile, Lonicera japonica thunb. [WWW document] URL http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=LOJA

  • Wang R, Wang Y (2006) Invasion dynamics and potential spread of the invasive alien plant species Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) in China. Divers Distrib 12:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward DF (2007) Modelling the potential geographic distribution of invasive ant species in New Zealand. Biol Invasion 9:723–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank S. R. Keller for initial guidance on the use of MaxEnt. We also thank D. C. Gist of the University of Virginia’s Scholars’ Lab for significant assistance with ArcGIS. This manuscript was greatly improved through suggestions from J. Elith and two anonymous reviewers. We also thank D. A. Roach, M. L. Aikens, C. Dai, and K. Barnard-Kubow for offering valuable feedback on our manuscript. We thank the following herbaria for information on Lonicera japonica presence in the United States: TAMU, MNA, CMML, TAES, TAC, KANU, COLO, GH, NY, MO, LSU, MUR, BH, VPI, US. Finally, we thank the Jeffress Memorial Trust and the Jefferson Scholars Foundation for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn M. Beans.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3819 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beans, C.M., Kilkenny, F.F. & Galloway, L.F. Climate suitability and human influences combined explain the range expansion of an invasive horticultural plant. Biol Invasions 14, 2067–2078 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0214-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0214-0

Keywords

Navigation