Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coexistence patterns of two invasive thistle species, Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides, at three spatial scales

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To better understand the competitive processes involved in invasion by congeners, we examine coexistence patterns of two invasive species, Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides, at three spatial scales. A roadside survey of 5 × 5 km blocks in a previously identified overlap zone provided information about the regional scale. At smaller scales, we surveyed four fields of natural co-occurrence, quantifying the spatial patterns at the field scale by randomly placed 1 × 1 m quadrats and at the smallest scale by detailing plant position within the quadrats. The patterns observed are strikingly different at the different scales. At the regional scale, there is positive local autocorrelation in both species but negative cross-correlation between them, consistent with previous surveys. However, at the field scale, there is positive local autocorrelation in both species, and we generally see a positive association between the two species. At the plot scale, when excluding areas of joint absence, there is again a negative association between the two species. This pattern can also be seen at the field scale when excluding plots with joint absence. These results suggest that, at the scale of a field, the strongest factor determining location is aggregation in favorable habitats, which is a stronger force than the competition-induced segregation evidenced at small scales. Lottery competition for spatially aggregated safe sites thus appears to drive the patterns observed at the field scale, while the regional scale pattern may be a result of restricted natural dispersal and invasion history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen M, Shea K (2006) Spatial segregation of congeneric invaders in central Pennsylvania, USA. Biol Invasions 8:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra SWT (1978) Carduus thistle distribution and biological control in the northeastern states. In: Frick KE (ed) Biological control of the genus Carduus in the United States—a progress report, pp 18–22, science and education administration, US. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnstad ON (2009) ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. R package version 1.1–3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ncf

  • Bjørnstad ON, Falck W (2001) Nonparametric spatial covariance functions: estimation and testing. Environ Ecol Stat 8:53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker BM, Pacala SW (1999) Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am Nat 153:575–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock JM, Edwards RJ, Carey PD, Rose RJ (2000) Geographical separation of two Ulex species at three spatial scales: does competition limit species’ ranges? Ecography 23:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ (1983) Assembly of mangrove ant communities—patterns of geographical-distribution. J Anim Ecol 52:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingham YC, Wadsworth RA, Huntley B, Hulme PE (2000) Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. J Appl Ecol 37:13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale MRT (1999) Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers AM, Bain JF, Warwick SI (1988) The biology of Canadian weeds 89. Carduus nutans L. and Carduus acanthoides L. Can J Plant Sci 68:1053–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities, pp 342–444. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (1999-2001) ArcGIS Desktop, Version 8.3

  • Feldman SR, Lewis JP (1990) Output and dispersal of propagules of Carduus acanthoides L. Weed Res 30:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick MC, Weltzin JF, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR (2007) The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick MC, Dunn RR, Sanders NJ (2008) Data sets matter, but so do evolution and ecology. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:562–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler NL (1988) What is a safe site—neighbor, litter, germination date, and patch effects. Ecology 69:947–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR (2002) Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. J Ecol 90:419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Barton AM (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities—a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart DR, Gardner RH (1997) A spatial model for the spread of invading organisms subject to competition. J Math Biol 35:935–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegi G (1987) Carduus distel. llustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, Paul Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien MH and Griffiths MW (1999) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. 4th edn

  • Kelly D and Popay AI (1985) Pasture production lost to unsprayed thistles at two sites.In: Proceedings of the 38th New Zealand weed and pest control conference. pp 115–118

  • Kok LT (2001) Classical biological control of nodding and plumeless thistles. Biol Control 21:206–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok LT, Mays WT (1991) Successful biological control of plumeless thistle, Carduus acanthoides L. [Campanulatae: Asteraceae (=Compositae) by Trichosirocalus horridus (Panzer) (Coleoptera:Curculionidae) in Virginia. Biol Control 1:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok LT, Surles WW (1975) Successful biocontrol of musk thistles by an introduced weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus. Environ Entomol 4:1025–1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Komonen A (2005) Local spatial pattern in the occurrence of two congeneric wood-decaying fungi in an old-growth boreal forest. Scand J For Res 20:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper & Row, New York, p 654

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation—trouble or new paradigm. Ecology 74:1659–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Fortin MJ (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1989) Challenges in the development of a theory of ecosystem structure and function. In: Roughgarden J, May RM, Levin SA (eds) Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton Univeristy Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty MK (1982) Musk thistle (Carduus thoermeri) seed production. Weed Sci 30:441–445

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty MK, Scifres CJ, Smith AL, Horst GL (1969) Germination and early seedling development of musk and plumeless thistles. University of Nebraska, Nebraska, pp 1–28

  • Medd RW, Smith RCG (1978) Prediction of potential distribution of Carduus-Nutans (Nodding Thistle) in Australia. J Appl Ecol 15:603–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RJ, Mulligan GA (1956) Natural hybridization between Carduus acanthoides and Carduus nutans in Ontario. Can J Bot 34:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murrell DJ, Law R (2003) Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors. Ecol Lett 6:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala SW (1986) Neighborhood models of plant-population dynamics.2. multispecies models of annuals. Theor Popul Biol 29:262–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauchard A, Shea K (2006) Integrating the study of non-native plant invasions across spatial scales. Biol Invasions 8:399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauchard A, Alaback PB, Edlund EG (2003) Plant invasions in protected areas at multiple scales: linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae) in the west Yellowstone area. West N Am Nat 63:416–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Poll M, Naylor BJ, Alexander JM, Edwards PJ, Dietz H (2009) Seedling establishment of Asteraceae forbs along altitudinal gradients: a comparison of transplant experiments in the native and introduced ranges. Divers Distrib 15:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purves DW, Law R (2002) Fine-scale spatial structure in a grassland community: quantifying the plant’s-eye view. J Ecol 90:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Austria: R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna

  • Rauschert ESJ (2006) Competitive interactions and associations of the invasive thistles Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides. Ph.D. thesis, Intercollege graduate degree program in ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, p 253

  • Rhodes AF, Block TA (2000) The plants of Pennsylvania: an illustrated manual. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabloom EW, Bjørnstad ON, Bolker BM, Reichman OJ (2005) Spatial signature of environmental heterogeneity, dispersal, and competition in successional grasslands. Ecol Monogr 75:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Kelly D (1998) Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand. Ecol Appl 8:824–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindel BM (1991) A review of the ecology and control of thistles in Australia. Weed Res 31:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarpaas O, Shea K (2007) Dispersal patterns, dispersal mechanisms, and invasion wave speeds for invasive thistles. Am Nat 170:421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner K, Smith L, Rice P (2000) Using noxious weed lists to prioritize targets for developing weed management strategies. Weed Sci 48:640–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll P, Bergius E (2005) Pattern and process: competition causes regular spacing of individuals within plant populations. J Ecol 93:395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS (2010) The PLANTS database (http://plants.usda.gov). Accessed 15 January 2010

  • Warwick SI, Thompson BK (1989) The mating system in sympatric populations of Carduus-Nutans, C-Acanthoides and their hybrid swarms. Heredity 63:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick SI, Bain JF, Wheatcroft R, Thompson BK (1989) Hybridization and introgression in Carduus-Nutans and Carduus- Acanthoides reexamined. Systematic Botany 14:476–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988) Community structure in the flora of islands in lake Manapouri, New-Zealand. J Ecol 76:1030–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston MR (1995) Cooccurrence of morphologically similar species of stream fishes. Am Nat 145:527–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by USDA-CSREES (Biology of Weedy and Invasive Plants) NRI grant #2002-35320-1228 to KS and a NASA Space Grant Fellowship to ER. We wish to thank Zeynep Sezen and Olav Skarpaas for support throughout the project, two anonymous families for the use of their fields and John Mellon, Jeff Butterbaugh, Elizabeth Dlugosz, Adam Reese, Stephen Selego and Gabby Hrycyshyn for field assistance. Eelke Jongejans, Zeynep Sezen and Olav Skarpaas provided useful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IGDP in Ecology and Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Emily S. J. Rauschert

  2. IGDP in Ecology and Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Katriona Shea

  3. IGDP in Ecology and Departments of Entomology and Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Ottar N. Bjørnstad

Authors
  1. Emily S. J. Rauschert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katriona Shea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ottar N. Bjørnstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily S. J. Rauschert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rauschert, E.S.J., Shea, K. & Bjørnstad, O.N. Coexistence patterns of two invasive thistle species, Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides, at three spatial scales. Biol Invasions 14, 151–164 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-9992-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-9992-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation