Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 547–556

Latitudinal shifts of introduced species: possible causes and implications

Original Paper


This study aims to document shifts in the latitudinal distributions of non-native species relative to their own native distributions and to discuss possible causes and implications of these shifts. We used published and newly compiled data on inter-continentally introduced birds, mammals and plants. We found strong correlations between the latitudinal distributions occupied by species in their native and exotic ranges. However, relatively more non-native species occur at latitudes higher than those in their native ranges, and fewer occur at latitudes lower than those in their native ranges. Only a small fraction of species examined (i.e. <20% of animals and <10% of plants) have expanded their distributions in their exotic range beyond both high- and low-limits of their native latitudes. Birds, mammals and plants tended to shift their exotic ranges in similar ways. In addition, most non-native species (65–85% in different groups) have not reached the distributional extent observed in their native ranges. The possible drivers of latitudinal shifts in the exotic range may include climate change, greater biotic resistance at lower latitudes, historical limitations on ranges in native regions, and the impacts of humans on species distributions. The relatively restricted distribution of most species in their exotic range highlights the great potential of future spread of most introduced species and calls for closely monitoring their directional spread under climate change.


Climate change Invasion potential Land use Niche Risk assessment Species range 

Supplementary material

10530_2011_94_MOESM1_ESM.doc (834 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 834 kb)


  1. Alexander JM, Edwards PJ (2010) Limits to the niche and range margins of alien species. Oikos 119:1377–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker HG, Stebbins GL (1965) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Beerling DJ, Huntley B, Bailey JP (1995) Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. J Veg Sci 6:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Britton JR, Cucherousset J, Davies GD, Godard M, Copp GH (2010) Non-native fishes and climate change: predicting species responses to warming temperatures in a temperate region. Freshw Bio 55:1130–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Müller-Schärer H, Thuiller W, Peterson ATP, Guisan A (2007) Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10:701–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colautti RI, Maron JL, Barrett SC (2009) Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol Appl 2:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis MA (2009) Invasion biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Invading populations of an ornamental shrub show rapid life history evolution despite genetic bottlenecks. Ecol Lett 11:701–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fine PVA (2002) The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. J Trop Ecol 18:687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick M, Weltzin J, Sanders N, Dunn R (2007) The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallagher RV, Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Leishman MR (2010) Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. J Ecol 98:790–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo Q, Qian H, Ricklefs RE, Xi W (2006) Distributions of exotic plants in eastern Asia and North America. Ecol Lett 9:827–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison P, Pearce F (2000) AAAS Atlas of population and environment. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA (2010) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jablonski D (2008) Extinction and the spatial dynamics of biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(Suppl):11528–11535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson ST, Sax DF (2010) Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. Trends Ecol Evol 25:153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufman DM (1995) Diversity of New World mammals: universality of the latitudinal gradient of species and bauplans. J Mamm 76:322–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S, Oberdorff T, Brosse S (2008) Fish invasions in the world’s river systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities. PloS Bio 6:404–410Google Scholar
  19. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (eds) (2007) Invasion ecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mack RN (1996) Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Bio Conserv 78:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson AT, Stewart A, Mohamed KI, Araújo MB (2008) Shifting global invasive potential of European plants with climate change. PLoS ONE 3:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2006) The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants. J Biogeogr 33:2040–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme P, Kühn I et al (2010) Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12157–12162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2004) Geographic distribution and ecological conservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America. J Ecol 92:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rejmánek M (1996) Species richness and resistance to invasions. In: Orians GH, Dirzo R, Cushman JH (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem processes in tropical forests. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the southern-hemisphere—determinants of spread and invadability. J Biogeogr 21:511–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricklefs RE, Latham RE (1992) Intercontinental correlation of geographical ranges suggests stasis in ecological traits of relict genera of temperate perennial herbs. Am Nat 139:1305–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sax DF (2001) Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: implications for biogeography. J Biogeogr 28:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sax DF, Gaines SD, Brown JH (2002) Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds. Am Nat 160:766–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (eds) (2005) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  34. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH, Bruno JF, Dawson MN, Gaines SD, Grosberg RK, Hastings A, Holt RD, Mayfield MM, O’Connor MI, Rice WR (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:465–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith KF, Sax DF, Gaines SD, Guernier V, Guegan JF (2007) Globalization of human infectious disease. Ecology 88:1903–1910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M (2005) Niche-based modeling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Change Bio 11:2234–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walther G-R, Roques A, Hulme PE et al (2009) Alien species in a warmer world–risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 24:686–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Welk E, Schubert K, Hoffman MH (2002) Present and potential distribution of invasive garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in North America. Divers Distrib 8:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qinfeng Guo
    • 1
  • Dov F. Sax
    • 2
  • Hong Qian
    • 3
  • Regan Early
    • 4
  1. 1.USDA FS, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment CenterAshevilleUSA
  2. 2.Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.Research and Collections Center, Illinois State MuseumSpringfieldUSA
  4. 4.Cátedra “Rui Nabeiro” BiodiversidadeUniversidade de ÉvoraÉvoraPortugal

Personalised recommendations