Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of stochastic gravity model selection for use in estimating non-indigenous species dispersal and establishment

Biological Invasions volume 13, pages 2445–2458 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Predicting dispersal of nonindigenous species (NIS) is an essential component of risk analysis and management, as preventative measures are most readily applied at this stage of the invasion sequence. Gravity models provide one of the most useful techniques available to model dispersal of nonindigenous invasive species (NIS) across heterogeneous landscapes, as these models are able to capture transport patterns of recreational boaters who are dominant vectors responsible for aquatic NIS dispersal. Despite the widespread use of gravity models in forecasting biological invasions, different classes of gravity models have not been evaluated regarding their comparative ability to capture recreational transport patterns and subsequent use in predicting NIS establishment. Here we evaluate model selection between unconstrained, total-flow-constrained, production-constrained and doubly-constrained stochastic gravity models to assess dispersal of the spiny waterflea Bythotrephes between Ontario lakes. Differences between the models relate to the amount of data required and constraints under which calculations of source/destination interactions are made. For each class of gravity model, we then estimated the probability of a lake having established Bythotrephes populations by modeling the relationship between empirical presence/absence data and inbound recreational traffic (i.e. propagule pressure) via boosted regression. The unconstrained gravity model provided the best fit to observed traffic patterns of recreational boaters. However, when output from the gravity models was used to predict Bythotrephes establishment, the doubly-constrained gravity model provided the strongest relationship between inbound recreational traffic and observed Bythotrephes presence/absence, followed by the production-constrained model. Our results indicate production-constrained gravity models offer an acceptable balance between modeling recreational boater traffic and their utility to estimate establishment probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anas A (1983) Discrete choice theory, information-theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Trans Res B Methodol 17:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JE (1979) Theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69:106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Black JA, Salter RJ (1975) A statistical evaluation of the accuracy of a family of gravity models. Proc Instit Civil Eng Part 2 Res Theor 59:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael NE, McConnell KE, Strand IE (1989) A random utility model for sportfishing: some preliminary results for Florida. Mar Res Econ 6:245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossenbroek JM, Kraft CE, Nekola JC (2001) Prediction of long-distance dispersal using gravity models: zebra mussel invasion of inland lakes. Ecol Appl 11:1778–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossenbroek JM, Johnson LE, Peters B, Lodge DM (2007) Forecasting the expansion of zebra mussels in the United States. Con Biol 21:800–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau SA, Yan ND (2004) Auditing the accuracy of a volunteer-based surveillance program for an aquatic invader Bythotrephes. Environ Monitor Assess 91:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branstrator DK, Brown ME, Shannon LJ, Thabes M, Heimgartner K (2006) Range expansion of Bythotrephes longimanus in North America: evaluating habitat characteristics in the spread of an exotic invader. Biol Invas 8:1367–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invas 8:1023–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA (2003) Biotic globalization: does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity? Bioscience 53:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 39:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1:54–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmerman NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew R, Aitkin M (1982) A method of fitting the gravity model based on the Poisson distribution. J Reg Sci 22:191–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth DM, Duncan RP (2001) Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. Am Nat 157:583–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS (1981) Spatial structure and distance-decay parameters. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 71:425–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridley JD, Stachowicz JJ, Naeem S, Sax DF, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Stohlgren TJ, Tilman D, Von Holle B (2007) The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88:3–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR, Barry SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol Invas 10:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KE, Fotheringham AS (1984) Gravity and spatial interaction models. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Herborg L-M, Jerde CL, Lodge DM, Ruiz GM, MacIsaac HJ (2007) Predicting invasion risk using measures of introduction effort and environmental niche models. Ecol Appl 17:663–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huff DL (1959) Geographical aspects of consumer behavior. U Wash Bus Rev 18:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansakul N (2005) Fitting a zero-inflated negative binomial model via R. In: Proceedings of the 20th international Wksh Stat Model, pp 277–284

  • Jarnagin ST, Swan BK, Kerfoot WC (2000) Fish as vectors in the dispersal of Bythotrephes cederstroemi: diapausing eggs survive passage through the gut. Freshw Biol 43:579–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2005) Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7198–7202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johannsson OE, Mills EL, Ogorman R (1991) Changes in the nearshore and offshore zooplankton communities in Lake Ontario—1981–88. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1546–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaars HAM, Gille L (1994) Range extension of the predatory cladoceran Bythotrephes longimanus Leydig 1860 (Crustacea, Onychopoda) in Western Europe. Neth J Aquat Ecol 28:175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Delaney DG (2006) Managing sparse data in biological invasions: a simulation study. Ecol Model 198:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti GA (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 269:2407–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Predicting invasions: propagule pressure and the gravity of Allee effects. Ecology 85:1651–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Bossenbroek JM, Lodge DM (2006) Boats, pathways, and aquatic biological invasions, estimating dispersal potential with gravity models. Biol Invas 8:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linneman HV (1966) An econometric study of international trade flows. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol Biogeogr 17:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Williams S, MacIsaac HJ, Hayes KR, Leung B, Reichard S, Mack RN, Moyle PB, Smith M, Andow DA, Carlton JT, McMichael A (2006) Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol Appl 16:2035–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacIsaac HJ, Ketelaars HAM, Grigorovich IA, Ramcharan CW, Yan ND (2000) Modeling Bythotrephes longimanus invasions in the Great Lakes basin based on its European distribution. Arch Hydrobiol 149:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIsaac HJ, Borbely J, Muirhead JR, Graniero P (2004) Backcasting and forecasting biological invasions of inland lakes. Ecol Appl 14:773–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson JM, Jetz W, Rogers DJ (2004) The effects of species’ range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact? J Appl Ecol 41:811–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne BA, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone AL, Hall RJ, Harrison S, Hastings A, Holland M, Holyoak M, Lambrinos J, Moore K, Yokomizo H (2007) Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol Lett 10:77–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potapov A, Muirhead JR, Lele SR, Lewis MA (2010) Stochastic gravity models for modeling lake invasions. Ecol Model. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.024

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, PyÅ¡ek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour M, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Richardson DM (2003) Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. Am Nat 162:713–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider DW, Ellis CD, Cummings KS (1998) A transportation model assessment of the risk to native mussel communities from zebra mussel spread. Conserv Biol 12:788–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siderelis C, Moore RL (1998) Recreation demand and the influence of site preference variables. J Leisure Res 30:301–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden MJ, Olden JD (2008) A management framework for preventing the secondary spread of aquatic invasive species. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:1512–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veltman CJ, Nee S, Crawley MJ (1996) Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. Am Nat 147:542–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–3218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz EJ, Yan ND (2010) Relative value of limnological, geographic, and human use variables as predictors of the presence of Bythotrephes longimanus in Canadian Shield lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:462–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zipf GK (1946) The P1P2/D hypothesis: on the intercity movement of persons. Am Sociol Rev 11:677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for discussions with M. A. Lewis and A. Potapov, and for financial support from the Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Network, an OGS scholarship and NSERC postdoctoral fellowship to JRM, and by an NSERC Discovery Grant and a DFO Invasive Species Research Chair to HJM.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jim R. Muirhead

    Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 3P9, Canada

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada

    Hugh J. MacIsaac

Authors
  1. Jim R. Muirhead
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hugh J. MacIsaac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim R. Muirhead.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muirhead, J.R., MacIsaac, H.J. Evaluation of stochastic gravity model selection for use in estimating non-indigenous species dispersal and establishment. Biol Invasions 13, 2445–2458 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0070-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0070-3

Keywords

search

Navigation