Biological Invasions

, Volume 13, Issue 8, pp 1767–1777 | Cite as

Non-invasive invaders from the Caribbean: the status of Johnstone’s Whistling frog (Eleutherodactylus johnstonei) ten years after its introduction to Western French Guiana

  • Raffael ErnstEmail author
  • David Massemin
  • Ingo Kowarik
Original Paper


The neotropical frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae) has been referred to as a highly invasive species on grounds of its wide distribution and is expected to extend its range significantly based on recent climate model assumptions. The frog was introduced to a number of South American mainland localities, including French Guiana. Other species of the genus have become invasive on oceanic islands such as Hawaii where they pose serious biological and economical problems. No data are available on the invasion status of E. johnstonei populations from coastal South America. Here we present the first assessment of the status of a mainland population from French Guiana 10 years after the introduction of the species. We found that the species has not spread significantly within the last ten years and so far does not exhibit a high invasion potential. Frogs were restricted to urban garden habitats showing significantly higher abundance in gardens containing ornamental potted plants. Distribution patterns were best explained by two dispersal-related factors operating at different scales: (1) distance of occupied sites to nearest population indicating short-distance active dispersal using stepping stone habitats, and (2) distance of occupied sites to shore with a distinct bimodal pattern indicating long-distance passive or jump-dispersal, most likely due to the exchange or transfer of ornamental plants. Even though past and current invasion potential can be considered low, we advocate the implementation of a regional monitoring scheme and detailed studies on biotic interactions with native fauna.


Eleutherodactylus frogs Exotic amphibians French Guiana Introduced species Invasion potential Habitat model 



RE was supported by a doctoral scholarship from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and research grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG ER 589/2-1). DM likes to particularly thank Renaud Faust for his invaluable help during field work. We are grateful to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions that greatly improved the initial version of this manuscript.


  1. Blackburn TM, Jeschke JM (2009) Invasion success and threat status: two sides of a different coin? Ecography 32:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bomford M, Kraus F, Barry SC, Lawrence E (2009) Predicting establishment success for alien reptiles and amphibians: a role for climate matching. Biol Invasions 11:713–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourne GR (1997) Reproductive behaviour of terrestrial breeding frogs Eleutherodactylus johnstonei in Guyana. J Herpetol 31:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis MA (2009) Invasion biology. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis MA, Thompson K (2000) Eight ways to be a colonizer; two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:226–230Google Scholar
  6. Dorcas ME, Price SJ, Walls SC, Barichivich WJ (2010) Auditory monitoring of anuran populations. In: Dodd CK (ed) Amphibian ecology and conservation–a handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14:135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ficetola GF, Coïc C, Detaint M, Berroneau M, Lorvelec O, Miaud C (2007) Pattern of distribution of the American bullfrog Rana catesbeiana in Europe. Biol Invasions 9:767–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gargominy O (2003) Biodiversité et conservation dans les collectivités françaises d’outre-mer. Collection planète nature. Comité français pour l’UICN, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Germano JM, Sander JM, Henderson RW, Powell R (2003) Herpetofaunal communities in Grenada: a comparison of altered sites, with an annotated checklist of Grenadian amphibians and reptiles. Caribb J Sci 39:68–76Google Scholar
  11. Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13:422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaiser H, Hardy DJ (1994) Eleutherodactylus johnstonei. Catalogue Am Amphi rept 581.1–581.5Google Scholar
  13. Hardy JDJ, Harris HS (1979) Occurrence of the West Indian frog, Eleutherodactylus johnstonei, in South America and on the Island of Curaçao. Maryland Herpetological Soc 15:124–133Google Scholar
  14. Hedges SB (1993) Global amphibian declines: a perspective from the Caribbean. Biodivers Conserv 2:290–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henderson RW, Powell R (2001) Responses by the West Indian herpetofauna to human-influenced resources. Caribb J Sci 37:41–54Google Scholar
  16. Hufbauer RA, Torchin ME (2007) Integrating ecological and evolutionary theory of biological invasions. In: Nentwig W (ed) Biological invasions. Springer, Berlin GermanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Inderjit S, Cadotte MW, Colautti RI (2005) The ecology of biological invasions: past, present and future. In: Inderjit S (ed) Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhäuser, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaiser H (1992) The trade-mediated introduction of Eleutherodactalus martinicensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae) on St Barthélémy, French Antilles, and its implications for Lesser Antillean biogeography. J Herpetol 26:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaiser H (1997) Origins and introductions of the Caribbean frog, Eleutherodactylus johnstonei (Leptodactylidae): management and conservation concerns. Biodiv Cons 6:1391–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaiser H, Wagenseil R (1995) Colonization and distribution of Eleutherodactylus johnstonei Barbour (Anura: Leptodactylidae) on Dominica, West Indies. Caribb J Sci 31:341–344Google Scholar
  21. Kaiser H, Barrio-Amorós CL, Trujillo JD, Lynch JD (2002) Expansion of Eleutherodactylus johnstonei in northern South America: rapid dispersal through human interactions. Herpetol Rev 33:290–294Google Scholar
  22. Kowarik I (1995) Time-lags in biological invasions. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions. General aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publlication, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Kowarik I (2003) Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalization and population expansion of alien plant species. Biol Invasions 5:293–312Google Scholar
  24. Kraus F (2009) Alien reptiles and amphibians—a scientific compendium and analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Kraus F, Campbell EW (2002) Human-mediated escalation of a formerly eradicable problem: the invasion of Caribbean frogs in the Hawaiian Islands. Biol Invasions 4:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kraus F, Campbell EW, Allison A, Pratt T (1999) Eleutherodactylus frog introductions to Hawaii. Herpetol Rev 30:21–25Google Scholar
  27. La Marca E (1992) Catálogo taxonómico, biogeográfico y bibliográfico de las ranas de Venezuela. Cuadernos Geográficos. Universidad de Los Andes, Mérida, Venezuela 9:1–197Google Scholar
  28. Lampo M, de Leo GA (1998) The invasion ecology of the toad Bufo marinus: from South America to Australia. Ecol Appl 8:388–396Google Scholar
  29. Lescure J (2000) Past distribution of Leptodactylus fallax Müller, 1923 and Eleutherodactylus johnstonei Barbour, 1914 (Anura, Leptodactylidae). B Soc Herp Fr 94:13–23Google Scholar
  30. Lescure J, Marty C (1996) Répartition d’Eleutherodactylus johnstonei Barbour (Anoure, Leptodactylidés). Introduction en Guyane française. Biogeographica 72:121–125Google Scholar
  31. Lescure J, Marty C (2000) Atlas des Amphibiens de Guyane. Patrimoines naturels (MNHN/SPN), ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Lever C (2001) The cane toad. The history and ecology of a successful colonist, Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, YorkshireGoogle Scholar
  33. Lever C (2003) Naturalized reptiles and amphibians of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.KGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorvelec O, Pascal M, Pavis C, Feldmann P (2007) Amphibians and reptiles of the French, West Indies: inventory, threats and conservation. Appl Herpetol 4:131–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MEA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: bioderversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Ortega JE, Serrano VH, Ramírez-Pinilla MP, Lannoo MJ (2005) Reproduction of an introduced population of Eleutherodactylus johnstonei at Bucaramanga, Colombia. Copeia 2005:642–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ovaska K (1991) Reproductive phenology, population structure, and habitat use of the frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei in Barbados, West Indies. J Herpetol 25:424–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips BL, Shine R (2004) Adapting to an invasive species: toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes. PNAS 101:17150–17155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Platenberg RJ (2007) Impacts of Introduced species on an island ecosystem: non-native reptiles and amphibians in the US Virgin Islands. Proceedings USDA National Wildlife Research Center Symposia, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 168–174Google Scholar
  42. Pough HF, Stewart MM, Thomas RG (1977) Physiological basis of habitat partitioning in Jamaican Eleutherodactylus. Oecologia 27:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Powell R (2006) Conservation of the herpetofauna on the Dutch Windward Islands: St. Eustatius, Saba, and St. Maarten. Appl Herpetol 3:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Powell R, Henderson RW (2007) The St. Vincent (Lesser Antilles) herpetofauna: conservation concerns. Appl Herpetol 4:295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rödder D (2009) Human footprint, facilitated jump dispersal, and the potential distribution of the invasive Eleutherodactylus johnstonei Barbour 1914 (Anura Eleutherodactylidae). Trop Zool 22:205–217Google Scholar
  47. Romero S (2010) Muddy road molds debate on the future of Guyana. The New York Times, 8 May: A6Google Scholar
  48. Señaris JC, MacCulloch R (2005) Amphibians. In: Hollowell T, Reynolds R (eds) Checklist of the terrestrial vertebrates of the Guiana shield. Biol Soc Wash Bull 13: 9–23Google Scholar
  49. Sin H, Beard KH, Pitt WC (2008) An invasive frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui, increases new leaf production and leaf litter decomposition rates through nutrient cycling in Hawaii. Biol Invasions 10:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stewart MM (1977) The role of introduced species in a Jamaican frog community. In: H Wolda (ed) Proceedings IV symposium internacional de ecología tropical. Panama City, PanamaGoogle Scholar
  51. Stewart MM, Martin GE (1980) Coconut husk-piles—a unique habitat for Jamaican terrestrial frogs. Biotropica 12:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:645–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tuttle NC, Karen Beard KH, Pitt WC (2009) Invasive litter, not an invasive insectivore, determines invertebrate communities in Hawaiian forests. Biol Invasions 11:845–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Buurt G (2006) Conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Aruba, Curaçao and Bonaire. Appl Herpetol 3:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2007) Long-distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as driver of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 21:86–996Google Scholar
  57. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2008) Do cities export biodiversity? Traffic as dispersal vector across urban-rural gradients. Divers Distrib 14:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Woolbright LL, Hara AH, Jacobsen CM, Mautz WJ, Benevides FL (2006) Population densities of the Coqui, Eleutherodactylus coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in newly invaded Hawaii and in native Puerto Rico. J Herpetol 40:122–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zimmerman BL (1994) Audio strip transects. In: Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek L-AC, Foster MS (eds) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington & LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Museum of ZoologySenckenberg Natural History Collections DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Saint-Laurent du MaroniFrench Guiana
  3. 3.Department of EcologyTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations