Skip to main content
Log in

The role of horticulture in plant invasions: how grafting in cultivars of Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) can facilitate spread into natural areas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although few plant species escape from cultivation, some horticultural practices used with woody ornamentals may enhance their invasion potential into natural areas. One such procedure is grafting, in which individuals are propagated for commercial sale by joining a clone of a desired cultivar (the scion) with rootstock obtained from a different individual. If the rootstock can sprout and flower, it can potentially cross-pollinate the scion, leading to fruit production in a self-incompatible species. The effect of grafting on invasion success was examined in the Callery pear, Pyrus calleryana, one of the most popular landscaping trees in the United States. Using nine microsatellite markers, scion and rootstock were genotyped for 57 cultivated trees to characterize rootstock genotypes and the rootstock gene pool. Invasive populations were then sampled to determine if rootstock genotypes have contributed to their formation. In no case were scion and rootstock genotypes identical for any given cultivated tree and rootstock genotypes were genetically variable, although some cloned rootstock genotypes were detected. Rootstock genotypes were also observed in invasive populations, with up to 17% of wild individuals having at least one rootstock parent. These results indicate that rootstock can contribute to the formation of invasive populations of the Callery pear through cross-pollination with other available genotypes. Future investigations of woody ornamentals propagated by grafting should consider this horticultural practice as a potential contributor to invasiveness. Furthermore, plant breeders are encouraged to assess the ability of rootstock to sprout as well as its cross-compatibility with the scion or other cultivar genotypes growing nearby.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson NO (2006) Prevention of invasiveness in floricultural crops. In: Anderson NO (ed) Flower breeding and genetics. Springer, New York, pp 177–214

  • Anderson NO, Ascher PD (1993) Male and female fertility of loosestrife (Lythrum) cultivars. J Am Soc Hort Sci 118:851–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson NO, Galatowitsch SM, Gomez N (2006) Selection strategies to reduce invasive potential in introduced plants. Euphytica 148:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt JW, Muir AA, Piovia-Scott J, Veblan KE, Chang AL, Grossman JD, Weiskel HW (2007) Preventing horticultural introductions of invasive plants: potential efficacy of voluntary initiatives. Biol Invasions 9:909–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke MM, Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (2006) Prevalence of different horticultural taxa of ivy (Hedera spp., Araliaceae) in invading populations. Biol Invasions 8:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courchamp F, Berec L, Gascoigne J (2008) Allee effects in ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culley TM, Hardiman NA (2007) The beginning of a new invasive plant: a history of the ornamental Callery pear in the United States. Bioscience 57:956–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culley TM, Hardiman NA (2009) The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness: a case study of the ornamental pear tree Pyrus calleryana. Biol Invasions 11:1107–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deNattencourt D (2001) Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirr MA (1998) Manual of woody landscape plants: their identification, ornamental characteristics, culture, propagation and uses. Stipes Publishing, L.L.C, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfranceschi L, Seglias N, Tarchini R, Komjanc M, Gessler C (1998) Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theor Appl Gen 96:1069–1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford P, Prakash S, Zhu JM, Rikkerink E, Gardiner S, Bassett H, Forster R (1997) Microsatellites in Malus × domestica (apple): abundance, polymorphism and cultivar identification. Theor Appl Gen 94:249–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan B (2002) Managing a tough issue. Am Nurseryman Nov 15:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram DL, Yeager T (1990) Propagation of landscape plants. University of Florida Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences, Extension Publication CIR579. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/MG/MG10800.pdf

  • Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitajima K, Fox AM, Sato T, Nagamatsu D (2006) Cultivar selection prior to introduction may increase invasiveness: evidence from Ardisia crenata. Biol Invasions 8:1471–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer JM, Brand MH, Lubell JD (2006) Four cultivars of Japanese barberry demonstrate differential reproductive potential under landscape conditions. HortScience 41:762–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y et al (2004) Invasive ornamental plants: problems, challenges, and molecular tools to neutralize their invasiveness. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell JD, Brand MH, Lehrer JM, Holsinger KE (2008) Detecting the influence of ornamental Berberis thunbergii var. atropurpurea in invasive populations of Berberis thunbergii (Berberidaceae) using AFLP. Am J Bot 95:700–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:1753–1766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of non-indigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin J, Weller SG, Sakai AK (2005) Genetic diversity does not affect the invasiveness of fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in Arizona, California and Hawaii. Divers Distributions 11:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall JM, Marinelli J (1996) Invasive plants: weeds of the global garden. Brooklyn Botanic Garden, Brooklyn, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallent-Halsell NG, Watt MS (2009) The invasive Buddleja davidii (butterfly bush). Bot Rev 75:292–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trusty JL, Goertzen LR, Zipperer WC, Lockaby BG (2007a) Invasive Wisteria in the Southeastern United States: genetic diversity, hybridization and the role of urban centers. Urban Ecosyst 10:379–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trusty JL, Lockaby BG, Zipperer WC, Goertzen LR (2007b) Identity of naturalised exotic Wisteria (Fabaceae) in the south-eastern United States. Weed Res 47:479–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trusty JL, Goertzen LR, Zipperer WC, Lockaby BG (2008) Horticulture, hybrid cultivars and exotic plant invasion: a case study of Wisteria (Fabaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 158:593–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (2007) Floriculture & nursery crops yearbook—summary. ERS-FLO-2007s. Available at: www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/Flo/2007/09Sep/FLO2007s.txt

  • Vincent MA (2005) On the spread and current distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea 70:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SB, Knox GW (2006) Landscape performance, flowering, and seed viability of 15 Japanese silver grass cultivars grown in Northern and Southern Florida. HortTechnolog 16:686–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y et al (2002) Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124:129–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuccherelli S, Tassinari P, Broothaerts W, Tartarini S, Dondini L, Sansavini S (2002) S-Allele characterization in self-incompatible pear (Pyrus communis L.). Sex Plant Reprod 15:153–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank R. Culley for field help, H. Polychroniou for assistance with DNA extractions, the Hamilton County Park District for permission to work on their property, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. This work was funded by a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture to T. Culley (#06-35320-16565).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa M. Culley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Culley, T.M., Hardiman, N.A. & Hawks, J. The role of horticulture in plant invasions: how grafting in cultivars of Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) can facilitate spread into natural areas. Biol Invasions 13, 739–746 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9864-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9864-y

Keywords

Navigation