Biological Invasions

, Volume 12, Issue 12, pp 4019–4031 | Cite as

Introduced weed richness across altitudinal gradients in Hawai’i: humps, humans and water-energy dynamics

  • Gabi Jakobs
  • Christoph Kueffer
  • Curtis C. Daehler
Original Paper

Abstract

Native species richness commonly declines with increasing altitude, but patterns of introduced species richness across altitudinal gradients have been less frequently studied. We surveyed introduced roadside weeds along altitudinal transects ranging from 30 to 4,100 m in Hawai’i, with the objectives of (1) testing the hypothesis that a mass effect due to mixing of tropical and temperate species at mid-elevation promotes a hump-shaped pattern of introduced species richness with altitude, and (2) testing the potential roles of anthropogenic activity, energy (temperature) and water-energy dynamics (productivity-diversity hypothesis) in determining introduced weed richness. A total of 178 introduced weeds were recorded. Introduced weed richness does not decline monotonically with altitude. Rather, mixing of tropical and temperate species helps to maintain high mean richness up to 2,000 m, suggesting a mass effect, but without a distinct richness peak. Patchy occurrence of a transformer species, Pennisetum clandestinum, introduced high variance in richness at mid-elevations. General linear models considering estimated actual evapotranspiration (AET, a measure of energy-water dynamics) together with an index of human activity (distance from urban area or length of major roads) accounted for more variance in introduced weed richness than models with energy alone (temperature) and human activity. Native Hawaiian species richness along roadsides was also weakly correlated with AET but negatively associated with human activity. Our observed association between introduced species richness and AET mirrors patterns reported for native species richness around the world, indicating that AET-richness patterns can develop on a short time scale (on the order of 100 years). To test the generality of introduced weed richness patterns, we tried using the Hawai’i island model to predict weed richness on the neighboring island of Maui. Although weed richness on Maui was under-predicted, the same predictors (human activity and AET) were important on Maui. Scaling for differences in regional human population density or economic activity (both higher on Maui) may allow more accurate and transferable quantitative predictions of introduced weed richness patterns.

Keywords

Alien Disturbance Evapotranspiration Hawaii Invasive Maui Non-native Plants Roadside Tropical 

References

  1. Allen AP, Brown JH, Gillooly JF (2002) Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science 297:1545–1548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2007) Annual visitor research report. Hawai’i. Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  3. Arévalo JR, Delgado JD, Otto R, Naranjo A, Salas M, Fernández-Palacios JM (2005) Distribution of alien versus native plant species in roadside communities along an altitudinal gradient in Tenerife and Gran Canaria (Canary Islands). Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arteaga MA, Delgado JD, Otto R, Fernandez-Palacios JM, Arevalo JR (2009) How do alien plants distribute along roads on oceanic islands? A case study in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Biol Invasions 11:1071–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker T, Dietz H, Billeter R, Buschmann H, Edwards PJ (2005) Altitudinal distribution of alien plant species in the Swiss Alps. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:173–183Google Scholar
  6. Colautti R, Grigorovich I, MacIsaac H (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:1023–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colwell RK, Rahbek C, Gotelli NJ (2004) The mid-domain effect and species richness patterns: what have we learned so far? Am Nat 163:E1–E23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Currie DJ, Kerr JT (2008) Tests of the mid-domain hypothesis: a review of the evidence. Ecol Monogr 78:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daehler CC (2005) Upper-montane plant invasions in the Hawaiian Islands: patterns and opportunities. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denslow JS, Space JC, Thomas PA (2009) Invasive exotic plants in the tropical Pacific Islands: patterns of diversity. Biotropica 41:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Field R, Hawkins BA, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Alexandre J, Diniz-Filho F, Guégan J-F, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Turner JRG (2009) Spatial species-richness gradients across scales: a meta-analysis. J Biogeogr 36:132–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer AG (1960) Latitudinal variations in organic diversity. Evolution 14:64–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forster JR (1778) Observations Made during a voyage round the world, on physical geography, natural history, and ethnic philosophy. G. Robinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Gelbard JL, Belnap J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Cons Biol 17:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giambelluca TW, Schroeder TA (1998) Climate. In: Juvik SP, Juvik JO (eds) Atlas of Hawai’i, 3rd edn. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu, pp 49–59Google Scholar
  16. Grytnes JA (2003) Species-richness patterns of vascular plants along seven altitudinal transects in Norway. Ecography 26:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haider S, Alexander J, Dietz H, Trepl L, Edwards PJ, Kueffer C (2010) The role of bioclimatic origin, residence time and habitat context in shaping non-native plant distributions along an altitudinal gradient. Biol Invasions. doi: 10.1007/s10530-010-9815-7
  18. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1982) Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 108:225–230Google Scholar
  19. Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guegan J-F, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Porter EE, Turner JRG (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84:3105–3117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: Implications for conservation. Cons Biol 6:324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8788–8792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalwij JM, Robertson MP, van Rensburg BJ (2008) Distribution of exotic plants along a steep altitudinal gradient is facilitated by anthropogenic activities. Appl Veg Sci 11:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kueffer C, Daehler CC, Torres-Santana CW, Lavergne C, Meyer J-Y, Otto R, Silva L (2010) A global comparison of plant invasions on oceanic islands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazaridis A (2007) A note regarding the condition number: the case of spurious and latent multicollinearity. Qual Quant 41:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leu M, Hanser SE, Knick ST (2008) The human footprint in the west: a large-scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. Ecol Appl 18:1119–1139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Global Ecol Biogeogr 10:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mallen-Cooper J, Pickering CM (2008) Linear declines in exotic and native plant species richness along an increasing altitudinal gradient in the Snowy Mountains, Australia. Austral Ecol 33:684–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marini L, Gaston KJ, Prosser F, Hulme PE (2009) Contrasting response of native and alien plant species richness to environmental energy and human impact along alpine elevation gradients. Global Ecol Biogeogr 18:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McDougall KL, Morgan JW, Walsh NG, Williams RJ (2005) Plant invasions in treeless vegetation of the Australian Alps. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Middleton N, Thomas D (1992) World atlas of desertification. United Nations Environment Programme, Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL, Waide RB, Willig MR, Dodson SI, Gough L (2001) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82:2381–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nogues-Bravo D, Araujo MB, Romdal T, Rahbek C (2008) Scale effects and human impact on the elevational species richness gradients. Nature 453:216–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien EM (2006) Biological relativity to water-energy dynamics. J Biogeogr 33:1868–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pauchard A, Alaback PB (2004) Influence of elevation, land use and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected area of south-central Chile. Cons Biol 18:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pauchard A, Kueffer C, Dietz H, Daehler CC, Alexander J, Edwards PJ, Arevalo JR, Cavieres LA, Guisan A, Haider S, Jakobs G, McDougall K, Millar CI, Naylor BJ, Parks CG, Rew LJ, Seipel T (2009) Ain’t no mountain high enough: plant invasions reaching new elevations. Front Ecol Environ 7(9):479–486Google Scholar
  36. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL: <http://www.R-project.orgS>
  37. Rahbek C (1995) The elevational gradient of species richness—a uniform pattern? Ecography 18:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rahbek C (2005) The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol Lett 8:224–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rangel TFLVB, Felizola Diniz-Filho JA, Bini LM (2006) Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richardson DM, Pysek P, Rejmanek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity Distrib 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rohde K (1992) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos 65:514–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shmida A, Wilson MV (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. J Biogeogr 12:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevens GC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat 140:893–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tarr RS, McMurry FM (1919) World geographies. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Tassin J, Riviere JN (2003) Gradient altitudinal de richesse en plantes invasives à l’île de La Réunion (archipel des Mascareignes, océan Indien). Revue d’Ecologie 58:257–270Google Scholar
  46. Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism, an exposition of the theory of natural selection with some applications. Macmillan and Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Wester L, Juvik JO (1983) Roadside plant communities on Mauna Loa Hawaii. J Biogeogr 10:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whittaker RJ, Heegaard E (2003) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 84:3384–3390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu I-P (1997) A simple evapotranspiration model for Hawaii: the Hargreaves model. Fact Sheet EN–106. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, pp 2Google Scholar
  50. Zobel M, Partel M (2008) What determines the relationship between plant diversity and habitat productivity? Global Ecol Biogeogr 17:679–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabi Jakobs
    • 1
  • Christoph Kueffer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Curtis C. Daehler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of Hawai’i at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations