Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 12, Issue 10, pp 3473–3484 | Cite as

Predicting the post-fire establishment and persistence of an invasive tree species across a complex landscape

  • Dane M. KuppingerEmail author
  • Michael A. Jenkins
  • Peter S. White
Original Paper

Abstract

The reintroduction of pre-European fire regimes has allowed the entry of many invasive plant species into fire-dependant ecosystems of North America. However, the environmental factors that favor the post-fire establishment of these species across complex landscapes are not well understood and the initial establishment of invasive species does not necessarily result in long-term persistence. To evaluate the post-fire establishment and persistence of disturbance-dependent invasive plants, we studied the invasion of Paulownia tomentosa (princess tree, an early-successional species introduced from Asia) across three burns in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Based upon classification tree analysis, the presence/absence of P. tomentosa 2 years after burning was most strongly related to the cover of residual vegetation, topographic shading, and moisture availability. Spatial application of classification tree models to repeated survey data showed that P. tomentosa established across a wide range of microsites 2 years after burning. However, predicted habitat for P. tomentosa decreased by 63% 4 years after fire and by 73% 6 years after fire. Following its initial widespread establishment, P. tomentosa only persisted on xeric and exposed topographic positions that experienced high intensity burning. However, the sites where it persisted include rare community types that contain two endangered plant species that depend upon fire for successful reproduction. The control of P. tomentosa on these ecologically important sites may require special attention from land managers.

Keywords

Paulownia tomentosa Invasive species Southern Appalachians Fire Xeric forests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Robert Peet, Thomas Wentworth, Aaron Moody, Chris Webster, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. We also thank John Johnson for assistance with fieldwork and Jack Weiss for assistance with statistical analysis. Funding was provided by the Joint Fire Science Program and the Coker and Holland-Beers Scholarships.

References

  1. Abrams MD (1992) Fire and the development of oak forests. Bioscience 42:346–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MC, Watts JM, Frelich JE, Yool SR, Wakefield GI, McCauley JF, Fahnestock PB (2000) Regression-tree modeling of desert tortoise habitat in the central Mojave Desert. Ecol Appl 10:890–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ArcGIS (2008) (version 9.2) c(2008) ESRI Corporation, Redlands, CA. http://www.esri.com
  4. Beers TW, Dress PE, Wensel LC (1966) Aspect transformation in site productivity research. J For 64:691–692Google Scholar
  5. Brose P, Schuler T, Van Lear D, Berst J (2001) Bring fire back: the changing regimes of the Appalachian mixed-oak forests. J For 99:30–35Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter SB, Immel MJ, Smith ND (1983) Effect of photoperiod on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of Paulownia seedlings. Castanea 48:13–18Google Scholar
  7. Covington WW (2000) Helping western forests heal. Nature 408:135–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:182–211Google Scholar
  9. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dettmers R, Bart J (1999) A GIS modeling methods applied to predicting forest songbird habitat. Ecol Appl 9:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott KJ, Hendrick RL, Major AE, Vose JM, Swank WT (1999) Vegetation dynamics after a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manag 114:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engler R, Guisan A, Rechsteiner L (2004) An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J Appl Ecol 41:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandes PM, Botelho HS (2003) A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. Int J Wildland Fire 12:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. GRASS Development Team (2007) (Version 6.4.0) c(2007) Geographic resources analysis support system (GRASS) software http://grass.osgeo.org
  16. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu SY (1959) A monograph of the genus Paulownia. Q J Taiwan Museum 12:1–54Google Scholar
  18. Hu SY (1961) The economic botany of the Paulownias. Econ Bot 15:11–27Google Scholar
  19. Iversen LR, Prasad AM (1998) Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climactic change in the United States. Ecol Monogr 68:465–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkins MA, Johnson KD (2009) Exotic plant species invasion and control in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, United States. In: Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP, Batish DR (eds) Invasive plants and forest ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 295–322Google Scholar
  21. Keeley JE (2006) Fire management impacts on invasive plants in the western United States. Conserv Biol 20:375–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Keeley JE, Baer-Keeley M, Fotheringham CJ (2005) Alien plant dynamics following fire in Mediterranean-climate California shrublands. Ecol Appl 15:2109–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Langdon KR, Johnson KD (1994) Additional notes on invasiveness of Paulownia tomentosa tomentosa in natural areas. Nat Areas J 14:139–140Google Scholar
  24. Lasting Forests (2006) The Trevey: a total forest management plan and wildland management decision support system. http://fwie.fw.vt.edu/rhgiles/Trevey/Aspects.htm Accessed 1 Feb 2008
  25. Levine JM, Vilà M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic species invasions. Proc R Soc London 270:775–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL (2009) Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front Ecol Environ 7:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller JH (2003) Nonnative invasive plants of southern forests: a field guide for identification and control. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-62. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville 93 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore MM, Covington WW, Fulé PZ (1999) Reference conditions and ecological restoration: a southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecol Appl 9:1266–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life (2002) (Version 1.6) Arlington, Virginia, USA. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. Accessed 15 May 2007
  31. Newell CL, Peet RK (1998) Vegetation of Linville Gorge wilderness, North Carolina. Castanea 63:275–322Google Scholar
  32. Pickett STA, White PS (1985) Patch dynamics: a synthesis. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York, pp 371–384Google Scholar
  33. Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Carbin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. S-Plus (2006) (version 7.0) c(2006) Insightful Corporation, Seattle, WA. http://www.insightful.com
  36. Stephens SL, Ruth LW (2005) Federal forest fire policy in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang RC, Carpenter SB, Wittwer RF, Graves DH (1980) Paulownia tomentosa—a crop tree for wood products and reclamation of surface-mined land. South J Appl For 4:19–24Google Scholar
  38. Taylor CM, Hastings A (2004) Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species: a density-structured model for Spartina alterniflora. J Appl Ecol 41:1049–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner MG, Romme WH, Tinker DB (2003) Surprises and lessons from the 1998 Yellowstone fires. Front Ecol Environ 1:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. USFWS (1989) Heller’s blazing star recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  41. Vayssieres MP, Plant RE, Barbara A (2000) Classification trees: an alternative non-parametric approach for predicting species distributions. J Veg Sci 11:679–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vilà M, Weiner J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native species?—evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wangen SR, Webster CR (2006) Potential multi lag phases during biotic invasions: reconstructing an invasion of the exotic tree Acer platanoides. J Appl Ecol 43:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weakley AS (2007) Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia and Surrounding Areas. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams CE (1993) The exotic empress tree, P. tomentosa tomentosa: an invasive pest of forests? Nat Areas J 13:221–222Google Scholar
  46. Wimberly MC, Reilly MJ (2007) Assessment of fire severity and species diversity in the southern Appalachians using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery. Rem Sens Environ 108:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dane M. Kuppinger
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Michael A. Jenkins
    • 2
    • 4
  • Peter S. White
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Campus Box 3280University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Inventory and Monitoring ProgramTwin Creeks Science and Education Center, Great Smoky Mountains National ParkGatlinburgUSA
  3. 3.A.J. Lewis Center for Environmental StudiesOberlin CollegeOberlinUSA
  4. 4.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations