Biological Invasions

, Volume 12, Issue 9, pp 3249–3259 | Cite as

Ecological integration of alien species into a tree-parasitic fungus network

  • Corinne VacherEmail author
  • Jean-Jacques Daudin
  • Dominique Piou
  • Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau
Original Paper


The diversification of species and their interactions during the course of evolution has produced ecological networks with a complex topology. This topology influences the current functioning of ecosystems. It is therefore important to investigate whether the species introduced recently by human activities have merged seamlessly into recipient ecological networks by developing interactions quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those of native species, or whether their establishment has altered the topology of the networks. We tackled this issue in the case of a well resolved interaction network between 51 forest tree taxa and 154 pathogenic fungal species. We found that alien and native species with similar phylogenetic histories and life-history strategies had similar types and numbers of interactions. Our results also suggest that the clustered architecture of the network has not been altered by the integration of alien species. It therefore seems that a few centuries have been sufficient for the network to assimilate the newly introduced species. This rapid integration was unexpected for a plant-pathogen network, because selection acts continually on plants, favouring the emergence of defences against new pathogens and impeding the development of new interactions. However, it was recently shown that perturbation of the structure of ecological networks might be overlooked if species interactions are not quantified. The tree-parasitic fungus network considered in this study is binary. We might therefore end up with different results by using quantitative data.


Alien species Host-parasite interactions Trees Fungi Ecological networks Random graphs 



We thank the Département Santé des Forêts (DSF) for allowing us to use their database and the French research consortium Interactions Biotiques dans les communautés (GDR ComEvol) for funding. We also thank Julie Sappa (Alex Edelman & Associates) for language revision.

Supplementary material

10530_2010_9719_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (21 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 20 kb)
10530_2010_9719_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (34 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 34 kb)


  1. Aizen MA, Morales CL, Morales JM (2008) Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs. PLoS Biol 6:e31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antia R, Regoes RR, Koella JC, Bergstrom CT (2003) The role of evolution in the emergence of infectious diseases. Nature 426:658–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartomeus I, Vila M, Santamaria L (2008) Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks. Oecologia 155:761–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bascompte J, Jordano P (2007) Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:567–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertheau C, Brockerhoff EG, Roux-Morabito G, Lieutier F, Jactel H (2010). Novel insect-tree associations resulting from accidental and intentional biological ‘invasions’: a meta-analysis of effects on insect fitness. Ecol Lett (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Bluthgen N, Frund J, Vazquez DP et al (2008) What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? Ecology 89:3387–3399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaway RM, Maron JL (2006) What have exotic plant invasions taught us over the past 20 years? Trends Ecol Evol 21:369–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clavero M, Garcia-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA et al (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daudin JJ, Picard F, Robin S (2008) A mixture model for random graphs. Stat Comput 18:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desprez-Loustau ML (2009) The alien fungi of Europe. In: Nentwig W, Hulme P, Pysek P, Vila M (eds) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Berlin, p 400Google Scholar
  12. Desprez-Loustau ML, Robin C, Buee M et al (2007) The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:472–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Desprez-Loustau ML, Courtecuisse R, Robin C et al (2010) Species diversity and drivers of spread of alien fungi in Europe with a particular focus on France. Biol Invasions 12:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobson A, Lafferty KD, Kuris AM et al (2008) Homage to Linnaeus: how many parasites? How many hosts? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11482–11489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia-Guzman G, Morales E (2007) Life-history strategies of plant pathogens: distribution patterns and phylogenetic analysis. Ecology 88:589–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawksworth DL, Rossman AY (1997) Where are all the undescribed fungi? Phytopathology 87:888–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heath MC (2000) Nonhost resistance and nonspecific plant defenses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:315–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M et al (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ings TC, Montoya JM, Bascompte J et al (2009) Ecological networks—beyond food webs. J Anim Ecol 78:253–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ives AR, Godfray HCJ (2006) Phylogenetic analysis of trophic associations. Am Nat 168:E1–E14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, Hayes RB, Whalley MR et al (2007) The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol Lett 10:539–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Memmott J, Waser NM (2002) Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:2395–2399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM et al (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 10:710–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mielke PW, Berry KJ (2001) Permutation methods: a distance function approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Montoya JM, Rodriguez MA, Hawkins BA (2003) Food web complexity and higher-level ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 6:587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morales CL, Aizen MA (2006) Invasive mutualisms and the structure of plant-pollinator interactions in the temperate forests of north-west Patagonia, Argentina. J Ecol 94:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nielsen A, Bascompte J (2007) Ecological networks, nestedness and sampling effort. J Ecol 95:1134–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P et al (2006) Vegan: community ecology package version 1.8-3. R package URL
  33. Olesen JM, Eskildsen LI, Venkatasamy S (2002) Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists. Divers Distrib 8:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parker IM, Gilbert GS (2004) The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:675–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petit RJ, Bialozyt R, Garnier-Gere P et al (2004) Ecology and genetics of tree invasions: from recent introductions to Quaternary migrations. For Ecol Manag 197:117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Picard F, Miele V, Daudin JJ, et al (2009) Deciphering the connectivity structure of biological networks using MixNet. BMC BioinformaticsGoogle Scholar
  37. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R et al (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prado PI, Lewinsohn TM (2004) Compartments in insect-plant associations and their consequences for community structure. J Anim Ecol 73:1168–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rezende EL, Lavabre JE, Guimaraes PR et al (2007) Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 448:925–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. SAS/STAT (2000) SAS Institute Inc., SAS OnlineDoc, version 8. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  41. Sugiura S, Yamaura Y, Makihara H (2008) Biological invasion into the nested assemblage of tree-beetle associations on the oceanic Ogasawara Islands. Biol Invasions 10:1061–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson JN (2006) Mutualistic webs of species. Science 312:372–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P et al (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biol 11:2234–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tylianakis JM, Tscharntke T, Lewis OT (2007) Habitat modification alters the structure of host-parasitoid food webs. Nature 445:202–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vacher C, Piou D, Desprez-Loustau M-L (2008a) Architecture of an antagonistic tree/fungus network: the asymmetric influence of past evolutionary history. PLoS ONE 3:e1740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Vacher C, Vile D, Helion E et al (2008b) Distribution of parasitic fungal species richness: influence of climate versus host species diversity. Divers Distrib 14:786–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valéry L, Fritz H, Lefeuvre J-C et al (2008) In search of a real definition of the biological invasion phenomenon itself. Biol Invasions 10:1345–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vermeij GJ (1996) An agenda for invasion biology. Biol Conserv 78:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vitousek PM, Dantonio CM, Loope LL et al (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:468–478Google Scholar
  50. Wilson JB, Steel JB, Dodd ME et al (2000) A test of community reassembly using the exotic communities of New Zealand roadsides in comparison to British roadsides. J Ecol 88:757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Worner SP, Gevrey M (2006) Modelling global insect pest species assemblages to determine risk of invasion. J Appl Ecol 43:858–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corinne Vacher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-Jacques Daudin
    • 2
  • Dominique Piou
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR1202 Biodiversité Gènes et Communautés (BioGeCo)INRA-Université Bordeaux ICestasFrance
  2. 2.UMR518 Mathématique et Informatique AppliquéesAgroParisTechParisFrance
  3. 3.Département de la Santé des ForêtsMinistère de l’Agriculture et de la PêcheCenonFrance

Personalised recommendations