Abstract
Introduction is a critical stage in vertebrates’ invasion process; once imported, they have a high probability of establishment and spread. While there is a consensus that trade is a primary conduit for non-indigenous species (NIS) introductions, and a key locus for preventive regulation, few policies have been evaluated by scientists for effectiveness. A science-based quantitative assessment of regulatory performance could significantly decrease invasion risk. We carried out a quantitative analysis of data on importation permits of terrestrial vertebrates and the reporting system, using the Israeli regulatory system as a model. This regulatory system is based on long-established wildlife protection legislation, now being used to control NIS vertebrates, much as is the case in many other countries. Ecological risk assessment for NIS was sometimes carried out, but it is not mandatory within the regulatory process, and no legally-binding criteria for assessment exist. We found a significant decrease in number of permits issued over the years, but this decrease does not reflect perception of ecological risk. We found permit quotas of much wider volumes than those actually used, indicating that trade volumes are dictated by retailers rather than by regulators. Actual imports are frequently not reported, hindering efforts to assess propagule pressure and to monitor and analyze effects of introductions. We conclude that the regulatory system should be more science-based, that the import database should be formulated to allow future ecological research and mitigation, and that legally-binding ecological risk assessment would contribute significantly to the strength of NIS regulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amitai P, Bouskila A (2001) Handbook of amphibians & reptiles of Israel. Keter Publishing House Ltd., Jerusalem (in Hebrew)
Bossenbroek JM, McNulty J, Keller RP (2005) Can ecologists heat up the discussions on invasive species risk? Risk Anal 25:1595–1597
Butterfield BP, Meshaka EW Jr, Guyer C (1997) Nonindigenous amphibians and reptiles. In: Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC (eds) Strangers in paradise. Island Press, Washington, pp 123–138
Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Russell GJ, Jones KE, Lockwood JL (2004) Influences on the transport and establishment of exotic bird species: an analysis of the parrots (Psittaciformes) of the world. Global Change Biol 10:417–426
Chertow M, Esty DC (eds) (1997) Thinking ecologically: the next generation of environmental policy. Yale University Press, New Haven
Christensen M (2004) Invasive species legislation and administration: New Zealand. In: Miller ML, Fabian RN (eds) Harmful invasive species: legal responses. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, pp 23–50
Cowie RH, Robinson DG (2003) Pathways of introduction of nonindigenous land and freshwater snails and slugs. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, pp 93–122
Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M (2007) The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conserv Biol 21:224–231
Drake JM, Lodge DM, Lewis M (2005) Theory and preliminary analysis of species invasions from ballast water: controlling discharge volume and location. Am Midl Nat 154:459–470
Genovesi P, Shine C (2003) European strategy on invasive alien species. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, t-pvs(2003)7, rev. 50 pp. IUCN (available online)
Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP) (2008) Highlights of the global invasive species programme (GISP) at the 9th conference of parties (COP9) of the convention on biological diversity (CBD), Bonn, Germany, 19–30 May 2008 (available online)
Hatzofe O, Nemzov S (2004) Exotic (invasive) terrestrial vertebrates species that have established wild populations in Israel. Internal Paper, Israel Nature and Parks Authority (in Hebrew) (available online)
Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2005) Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7198–7202
Justo-Hanani, R (2006) Invasive species in the terrestrial and aquatic habitats of Israel—ecological aspects, policy and legal framework. M.Sc. thesis, the program in ecology & environmental quality, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University (in Hebrew)
Kentula ME, Brooks RP, Gwin SE, Holland CC, Sherman AD, Sineos JC (1992) In: Hairston AJ (ed) Wetlands: an approach to improving decision-making in wetland restoration and creation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, pp 11–22
Kraus F (2003) Invasion pathways for terrestrial vertebrates. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, pp 68–92
Křivánek M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2006) Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv Biol 20:1487–1498
Lever C (2003) Naturalized reptiles and amphibians of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Levine JM, D’Antonio CM (2003) Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv Biol 17:322–326
Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228
Lodge DM, Williams S, Maclsaac HJ, Hayes KR, Leung B, Reichard S, Mack RN, Moyle PB, Smith M, Andow DA, Carlton JT, McMichael A (2006) Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. Ecol Appl 16:2035–2054
Long JL (1981) Introduced birds of the world. David & Charles, London
Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710
Mendelssohn H, Yom-Tov Y (1999) Mammalia of Israel. The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities, Jerusalem (in Hebrew)
Miller ML (2004) The paradox of U.S. alien species law. In: Miller ML, Fabian RN (eds) Harmful invasive species: legal responses. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, pp 125–184
Miller ML, Fabian RN (eds) (2004) Harmful invasive species: legal responses. Environmental Law Institute, Washington
Nemtzov SC (2009) Managing the import of wildlife to Israel to prevent invasive species. Legislative Hearing on H.R. 669, the “Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act”. House Subcommittee on Insular Affairs, Oceans and Wildlife. April 23rd, 2009. (available online)
Reichard SH (2005) The tragedy of the commons revisited: invasive species. Front Ecol Environ 3:109–110
Ricciardi A, Steiner WWM, Mack RN, Simberloff D (2000) Toward a global information system for invasive species. Bioscience 50:239–244
Rohlf DJ (1991) Six biological reasons why the endangered species act doesn’t work-and what to do about it. Conserv Biol 5:273–282
Roll U, Dayan T, Simberloff D (2007a) Non-indigenous insect species in Israel and adjacent areas. Biol Invasions 9:629–643
Roll U, Dayan T, Simberloff D, Goren M (2007b) Characteristics of the introduced fish fauna of Israel. Biol Invasions 9:813–824
Roll U, Dayan T, Simberloff D (2008) Non-indigenous terrestrial vertebrates in Israel and adjacent areas. Biol Invasions 10:659–672
Roll U, Dayan T, Simberloff D, Mienis HK (2009) Non- indigenous land-and freshwater gastropods in Israel. Biol Invasions 11:1963–1972
Schlaepfer MA, Hoover C, Kenneth DC (2005) Challenges in evaluating the impact of the trade in amphibians and reptiles on wild populations. Bioscience 55:256–264
Semmens BX, Buhle ER, Salomon AK, Pattengill-Semmens CV (2004) A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 266:239–244
Shine C, Williams N, Gundling L (2000) A guide to designing legal and institutional framework on alien invasive species. IUCN environmental policy and law paper no. 40. Gland, Cambridge and Bonn
Shine C, Williams N, Burhhene-Guilmine F (2005) Legal and institutional framework for invasive alien species. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK (eds) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington, pp 233–284
Shwartz A, Shirley S, Kark S (2008) How do habitat variability and management regime shape the spatial heterogeneity of birds within a large Mediterranean urban park? Landsc Urban Plan 84:219–229
Shwartz A, Strubbe D, Butler CJ, Matthysen E, Kark S (2009) The effect of enemy-release and climate factors on invasive birds: a regional test using the rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) as a case study. Divers Distrib 15:310–318
Simberloff D (2005) The politics of assessing risk for biological invasions: the USA as a case study. Trends Ecol Evol 20:216–222
Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC (eds) (1997) Strangers in paradise. Island Press, Washington
Svensson L, Grant P, Mullarney K, Zetterstrom D (2003) The complete guide to the birds of Europe and Israel. MAPA-Mapping and Publishing & Hakibbutz Hameuchad, Tel-Aviv (in Hebrew)
UNEP, Council of Europe (2006) Pan-European biological and landscape diversity strategy. Invasive alien species. The fourth intergovernmental biodiversity in Europe conference, held in Plitvice Lakes National Park (available online)
U.S Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) (2002) Leaving a lasting legacy: permits as a conservation tool. A vision and action plan. USFWS, Arlington, Virginia (available online)
Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Nemtzov from INPA Science Division for assisting us in obtaining data from the INPA permit database. We thank D. Simberloff for valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and three anonymous reviewers for their numerous and insightful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Justo-Hanani, R., Dayan, T. & Tal, A. The role of regulatory decision-making on non-indigenous species introductions. Biol Invasions 12, 2815–2824 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9687-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9687-x