Biological Invasions

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 743–748 | Cite as

Behavioral responses of American toad and bullfrog tadpoles to the presence of cues from the invasive fish, Gambusia affinis

  • Geoffrey R. Smith
  • Allison Boyd
  • Christopher B. Dayer
  • Kristen E. Winter
Orginal Paper

Abstract

The introduction of non-native predators is thought to have important negative effects on native prey populations. The susceptibility of native prey to non-native or introduced predators may depend on their ability to respond appropriately to the presence of these non-native predators. We conducted a laboratory based behavioral experiment to examine the response of American toad (Bufo americanus) and bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles to the presence of cues from the introduced mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis), a potential tadpole predator. Neither the American toad tadpoles nor the bullfrog tadpoles responded behaviorally to the presence of mosquitofish cues. If tadpoles are unable to respond to the presence of mosquitofish cues appropriately, then their ability to avoid predation by mosquitofish may be compromised and this may contribute to the impacts of mosquitofish on some tadpole populations.

Keywords

Alien species Behavior Bufo americanus Mosquitofish Rana catesbeiana Tadpoles 

References

  1. Arthington AH (1991) Ecological and genetic impacts of introduced and translocated freshwater fishes in Australia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:33–43Google Scholar
  2. Baber MJ, Babbitt KJ (2003) The relative impacts of native and introduced predatory fish on a temporary wetland tadpole assemblage. Oecologia 136:298–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baber MJ, Babbitt KJ (2004) Influence of habitat complexity on predator–prey interactions between the fish (Gambusia holbrooki) and tadpoles of Hyla squirella and Gastrophryne carolinensis. Copeia 2004:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bence JR (1988) Indirect effects and biological control of mosquitoes by mosquitofish. J Appl Ecol 25:505–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco S, Romo S, Villena M-J (2004) Experimental study on the diet of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) under different ecological conditions in a shallow lake. Inter Rev Hydrobiol 89:250–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgett AA, Wright CD, Smith GR, Fortune DT, Johnson SL (2007) Impact of ammonium nitrate on wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles: effects on survivorship and behavior. Herpetol Conserv Biol 2:29–34Google Scholar
  7. Chivers DP, Mirza RS (2001) Importance of predator diet cues in responses of larval wood frogs to fish and invertebrate predators. J Chem Ecol 27:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Courtenay WR Jr, Meffe GK (1989) Small fishes in strange places: a review of introduced poeciliids. In: Meffe GK, Snelson FF Jr (eds) Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox JG, Lima SL (2006) Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichomtomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol Evol 21:674–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denoël M, Dzukic G, Kalezic ML (2005) Effects of widespread fish introductions on paedomorphic newts in Europe. Conserv Biol 19:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eklöv P, Werner EE (2000) Multiple predator effects on size-dependent behavior and mortality of two species of anuran larvae. Oikos 88:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farley DG (1980) Prey selection by the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis in Fresno County rice fields. Proc Pap Ann Conf California Mosquito Vector Control Assoc 48:51–55Google Scholar
  14. Feminella JW, Hawkins CP (1994) Tailed frog tadpoles differentially alter their feeding behavior in response to non-visual cues from four predators. J N Am Benthol Soc 13:310–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gamradt SC, Kats LB (1996) Effect of introduced crayfish and mosquitofish on California newts. Conserv Biol 10:1155–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Berthou E (1999) Food of introduced mosquitofish: Ontogenetic diet shift and prey selection. J Fish Biol 55:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodsell JA, Kats LB (1999) Effect of introduced mosquitofish on Pacific treefrogs and the role of alternative prey. Conserv Biol 13:921–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubb JC (1972) Differential predation by Gambusia affinis on the eggs of seven species of anuran amphibians. Am Midl Nat 88:102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunzburger MS (2005) Differential predation on tadpoles influences the potential effects of hybridization between Hyla cinerea and Hyla gratiosa. J Herpetol 39:682–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunzburger MS, Travis J (2005) Critical literature review of the evidence for unpalatability of amphibian eggs and larvae. J Herpetol 39:547–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19:470–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamer AJ, Lane SJ, Mahony MJ (2002a) Management of freshwater wetlands for the endangered green and golden bell frog (Litoria aurea): roles of habitat determinants and space. Biol Conserv 106:413–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamer AJ, Lane SJ, Mahony MJ (2002b) The role of introduced mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in excluding the native green and golden bell frog (Litoria aurea) from original habitats in south-eastern Australia. Oecologia 132:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoare JM, Pledger S, Nelson NJ, Daugherty CH (2007) Avoiding aliens: behavioural plasticity in habitat use enables large, nocturnal geckos to survive Pacific rat invasions. Biol Conserv 136:510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horat P, Semlitsch RD (1994) Effects of predation risk and hunger on the behaviour of two species of tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howe E, Howe C, Lim R, Burchett M (1997) Impact of the introduced poeciliid Gambusia holbrooki (Girard, 1859) on the growth and reproduction of Pseudomugil signifer (Kner, 1865) in Australia. Mar Freshwater Res 48:425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurlbert SH, Mulla MS (1981) Impacts of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) predation on plankton communities. Hydrobiologia 83:125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hurlbert SH, Zedler J, Fairbanks D (1972) Ecosystem alteration by mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) predation. Science 175:639–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kats LB, Ferrer RP (2003) Alien predators and amphibian declines: review of two decades of science and the transition to conservation. Div Distrib 9:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Komak S, Crossland MR (2000) An assessment of the introduced mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis holbrooki) as a predator of eggs, hatchlings and tadpoles of native and non-native anurans. Wildl Res 27:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laurila A (2000) Behavioural responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles. Oikos 88:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laurila A, Pakkasmaa S, Merilä J (2006) Population divergence in growth rate and antipredator defences in Rana arvalis. Oecologia 147:585–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawler SP (1989) Behavioural responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. Anim Behav 38:1039–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawler SP, Dritz D, Strange T, Holyoak M (1999) Effects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened California red-legged frog. Conserv Biol 13:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis B, Goldingay R (1999) A preliminary assessment of the status of the green and golden bell frog in north-eastern NSW. In: Campbell A (ed) Declines and disappearances of Australian frogs. Environment Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  37. Lloyd LN, Arthington AH, Milton DA (1986) The mosquitofish—a valuable mosquito-control agent or a pest? In: Kitching RL (ed) The ecology of exotic animals and plants: some Australian case histories. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahoney M (1999) Review of the declines and disappearances within the bell frog species group (Litoria aurea species group) in Australia. In: Campbell A (ed) Declines and disappearances of Australian frogs. Environment Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  40. Mandrillon A-L, Saglio P (2005) Prior exposure to conspecific chemical cues affects predator recognition in larval common toad (Bufo bufo). Arch für Hydrobiol 164:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Margaritora FG, Ferrara O, Vagaggini D (2001) Predatory impact of the mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki Girard) on zooplanktonic populations in a pond at Tenuta di Castelporziano (Rome, central Italy). J Limnol 60:189–193Google Scholar
  42. Marquis O, Saglio P, Neveu A (2004) Effects of predators and conspecific chemical cues on the swimming activity of Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo tadpoles. Arch für Hydrobiol 160:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meffe GK (1985) Predation and species replacement in American southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwest Nat 30:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mirza RS, Ferrari MCO, Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP (2006) Responses of American toad tadpoles to predation cues: Behavioural response thresholds, threat-sensitivity and acquired predation recognition. Behaviour 143:877–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgan LA, Buttemer WA (1996) Predation by the non-native fish Gambusia holbrooki on small Litoria aurea and L. dentate tadpoles. Aust Zool 30:143–149Google Scholar
  46. Parris MJ, Reese E, Storfer A (2006) Antipredator behavior of chytridiomycosis-infected northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) tadpoles. Can J Zool 84:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator–prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35:420–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pyke GH, White AW (1996) Habitat requirements for the green and golden bell frog Litoria aurea (Anura: Hylidae). Aust Zool 30:224–232Google Scholar
  49. Pyke GH, White AW (2000) Factors influencing predation on eggs and tadpoles of the endangered Green and Golden Bell Frog Litoria aurea by the introduced Plague Minnow Gambusia holbrooki. Aust Zool 31:496–505Google Scholar
  50. Pyke GH, White AW (2001) A review of the biology of the Greena nd Golden Bell Frog Litoria aurea. Aust Zool 31:563–598Google Scholar
  51. Richardson JML (2001) A comparative study of activity levels in larval anurans and response to the presence of different predators. Behav Ecol 12:51–58Google Scholar
  52. Salo P, Korpimäki E, Banks PB, Nordström M, Dickman CR (2007) Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proc R Soc 274B:1237–1243Google Scholar
  53. Schoenherr AA (1981) The role of competition in the replacement of native fishes by introduced species. In: Naiman RJ, Soltz DL (eds) Fishes in North American deserts. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Semlitsch RD, Gavasso S (1992) Behavioural responses of Bufo bufo and Bufo calamita tadpoles to chemical cues of vertebrate and invertebrate predators. Ethol Ecol Evol 4:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soulé ME (1990) The onslaught of alien species, and other challenges in the coming decade. Conserv Biol 4:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stauffer RD, Semlitsch RD (1993) Effects of visual, chemical and tactile cues of fish on the behavioural responses of tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmánek M, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:468–478Google Scholar
  58. Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmánek M, Westbrooks R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N Z J Ecol 21:1–16Google Scholar
  59. Walton WE, Mulla MS (1991) Integrated control of Culex tarsalis larvae using Bacillus sphaericus and Gambusia affinis: Effects on mosquitoes and nontarget organisms in field mesocosms. Bull Soc Vect Ecol 16:203–221Google Scholar
  60. Webb C, Joss J (1997) Does predation by the fish Gambusia holbrooki (Atheriniformes: Poeciliidae) contribute to declining frog populations? Aust Zool 30:316–324Google Scholar
  61. White AW, Pyke GH (1996) Distribution and conservation status of the Green and Golden Bell Frog Litoria aurea in New South Wales. Aust Zool 30:177–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey R. Smith
    • 1
  • Allison Boyd
    • 1
  • Christopher B. Dayer
    • 1
  • Kristen E. Winter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyDenison UniversityGranvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations