Biological Invasions

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 359–368 | Cite as

Competitive exclusion after invasion?

  • Thomas Bøhn
  • Per-Arne Amundsen
  • Ashley Sparrow
Original Paper


The ‘Competitive Exclusion Principle’ is a foundation stone in the understanding of interspecific competition and niche relationships between species. In spite of having the status of a biological law, the principle has limited empirical support. In this study, we document strong effects of competition from the invading fish species vendace Coregonus albula over a 14-year period in the sub-arctic Pasvik watercourse. The native d.r. whitefish, that shared food and habitat niche with the invader, was displaced from its original niche and showed a more than 90% decline in population density over the study period. The study thus provides a unique record of how an exotic fish species excludes a native species from its original niche. Our data support the competitive exclusion principle, but also indicate that the vulnerability of the inferior competitor depends on a lack of alternative resources and on indirect ecological interactions.


Community structure Competitive exclusion Introduced exotic species Long-term empirical data Resource limitation 



Thanks to Stephen T. Ross for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and to Frode Staldvik, Laina Dalsbø, Jan Evjen, Elleke Wartena, Pål Arne Bjørn, Hallvard Jensen, Gry Hellander Våga, Ingrid Jensvoll, Karl Øystein Gjelland, Anna Siwertson, Odd Terje Sandlund and Rune Knudsen for help during field work. Financial support was given by the Norwegian Research Council under the program ‘Biological Diversity – Dynamics, Threats and Management’, the Directorate for Nature Management and the Governor of Finnmark County.


  1. Amundsen P-A, Staldvik FJ, Reshetnikov YS, Kashulin N, Lukin A, Bøhn T, Sandlund OT, Popova OA (1999) Invasion of vendace Coregonus albula in a subarctic watercourse. Biol Conserv 88:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundsen P-A, Bøhn T, Popova OA, Staldvik FJ, Reshetnikov YS, Kashulin NA, Lukin A (2003) Ontogenetic niche shifts and resource partitioning in a subarctic piscivore fish guild. Hydrobiologia 497:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amundsen P-A, Bøhn T, Våga G (2004) Gill raker morphology and feeding ecology of two sympatric whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) morphs. Ann Zool Fenn 41:125–136Google Scholar
  4. Bøhn T, Amundsen P-A (1998) Effects of invading vendace (Coregonus albula L.) on species composition and body size in two zooplankton communities of the Pasvik River System, northern Norway. J Plankton Res 20:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bøhn T, Amundsen P-A (2001) The competitive edge of an invading specialist. Ecology 82:2150–2163Google Scholar
  6. Bøhn T, Amundsen P-A, Popova OA, Reshetnikov YS, Staldvik FJ (2002) Predator avoidance of coregonids: habitat choice explained by size-related prey vulnerability? Arch Hydrobiol Spec Issues Adv Limnol Ergebnisse Limnol 57:183–197Google Scholar
  7. Bøhn T, Sandlund OT, Amundsen PA, Primicerio R (2004) Rapidly changing life history during invasion. Oikos 106:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brian MV (1956) Segregation of species of the ant genus Myrmica. J Anim Ecol 25:319–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diehl S, Eklov P (1995) Effects of piscivore-mediated habitat use on resources, diet, and growth of perch. Ecology 76:1712–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekschmitt K, Breckling B (1994) Competition and coexistence – the contribution of modeling to the formation of ecological concepts. Ecol Model 75:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. HaefnerGoogle Scholar
  13. Geiger W, Alcorlo P, Baltanas A, Montes C (2005) Impact of an introduced Crustacean on the trophic webs of Mediterranean wetlands. Biol Invas 7:49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gliwicz M, Pijanowska J (1989) The role of predation in zooplankton succession. In: Sommer U (ed) Plankton ecology: succession in plankton communities. Springer-Verlag, pp 253–296Google Scholar
  15. Glowka L, Burhenne-Guilmin F, Synge H (1994) A guide to the convention on biological diversity. IUCN, Gland & CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helminen H, Sarvala J (1994) Population regulation of vendace (Coregonus albula) in Lake Pyhajarvi, Southwest Finland. J Fish Biol 45:387–400Google Scholar
  18. Keddy PA (1989) Competition. Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazzaro X (1987) A review of planktivorous fishes: their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts. Hydrobiologia 146:97–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lotka AJ (1932) The growth of mixed populations: two species competing for a common food supply. J Washington Acad Sci 72:461–469Google Scholar
  21. Miller TE, Burns JH, Munguia P, Walters EL, Kneitel JM, Richards PM, Mouquet N, Buckley HL (2005) A critical review of twenty years’ use of the resource-ratio theory. Am Nat 165:439–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moyer GR, Osborne M, Turner TF (2005) Genetic and ecological dynamics of species replacement in an arid-land river system. Mol Ecol 14:1263–1273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mutenia A, Salonen E (1992) The vendace (Coregonus albula L.), a new species in the fish community and fisheries of Lake Inari. Arch Hydrobiol 39:797–805Google Scholar
  24. Næsje TF, Sandlund OT, Saksgård R (1998) Selective predation of piscivorous brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) on polymorphic whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.). Arch Hydrobiol Spec Issues Adv Limnol 50:283–294Google Scholar
  25. Nilsson NA (1967) Interactive segregation between fish species. In: Gerking SD (ed) The biological basis of freshwater fish production. Blackwell, pp 295–313Google Scholar
  26. Nilsson NA (1978) The role of size-biased predation in competition and interactive segregation in fish. In: Gerking SD (ed) Ecology of freshwater fish production. Blackwell, pp 303–325Google Scholar
  27. Ostbye K, Naesje TF, Bernatchez L, Sandlund OT, Hindar K (2005) Morphological divergence and origin of sympatric populations of European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.) in Lake Femund, Norway. J Evol Biol 18:683–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostbye K, Amundsen PA, Bernatchez L, Klemetsen A, Knudsen R, Kristoffersen R, Naesje TF, Hindar K (2006) Parallel evolution of ecomorphological traits in the European whitefish Coregonus lavaretus (L.) species complex during postglacial times. Mol Ecol 15:3983–4001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peters RH (1991) A critique for ecology. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Pianka ER (2000) Evolutionary ecology. Benjamin-CummingsGoogle Scholar
  31. Pimm SL (1989) Theories of predicting success and impact of introduced species. In: Drake JA (ed) Biological invasion: a global perspective. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  32. Ross ST (1986) Resource partitioning in fish assemblages: a review of field studies. Copeia 2:352–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross ST (1991) Mechanisms structuring stream fish assemblages: are there lessons from introduced species? Environ Biol Fishes 30:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanderson SL, Cheer AY, Goodrich JS, Graziano JD, Callan WT (2001) Crossflow filtration in suspension-feeding fishes. Nature 412:439–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken Å (1999) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  36. Simberloff D (1981) Community effects of introduced species. In: Nitecki MH (ed) Biotic crisis in ecological and evolutionary time. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Skurdal J, Vøllestad LA, Qenild T (1985) Comparison of scales and otoliths for age determination in whitefish Coregonus lavaretus. Fish Res 3:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Svärdson G (1976) Interspecific population dominance in fish communities in Scandinavian lakes. Inst Freshwater Res Drottningholm 55:144–171Google Scholar
  39. Tilman D (1980) Resources – a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. Am Nat 116:362–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Volterra V (1931) Variations and fluctuations of the numbers of individuals in animal species living together. In: Chapman RN (ed) Animal ecology. McGraw-Hill, pp 409–448Google Scholar
  42. Wang ZL, Wang FZ, Chen S, Zhu MY (2002) Competition and coexistence in regional habitats. Am Nat 159:498–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wauters LA, Tosi G, Gurnell J (2002) Interspecific competition in tree squirrels: do introduced grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) deplete tree seeds hoarded by red squirrels (S. vulgaris)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Mcpeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber M (1999) The aim and structure of ecological theory. Philos Sci 66:71–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Werner EE (1986) Species interactions in freshwater fish communities. In: Diamond JM, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Princeton University Press, pp 344–357Google Scholar
  47. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson KA, Magnuson JJ, Lodge DM, Hill AM, Kratz TK, Perry WL, Willis TV (2004) A long-term rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) invasion: dispersal patterns and community change in a north temperate lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:2255–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wootton RJ (1998) Ecology of teleost fishes. Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Bøhn
    • 1
  • Per-Arne Amundsen
    • 2
  • Ashley Sparrow
    • 3
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of Gene EcologyThe Science ParkTromso Norway
  2. 2.Norwegian College of Fishery ScienceUniversity of TromsøTromso Norway
  3. 3.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ScienceUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations