Skip to main content

Population life-cycle and stand structure in dense and open stands of the introduced tall herb Heracleum mantegazzianum

Biological Invasions volume 9, pages 799–811 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Populations of the introduced Heracleum mantegazzianum consist of dense central stands, which gradually give way to open stands towards the margins. To analyse whether open stands are due to unsuitable conditions or represent the invading front for further spread, we studied life-cycle, population dynamics, stand structure and soil conditions of open and dense stands over two transition periods. Populations decreased during the first interval but increased after the extremely dry and warm summer of 2003 during the second interval. Open stands had shorter generation times, lower height, smaller proportions of small individuals and were less in equilibrium with the environment than dense stands. In open stands, growth to higher stages was most important, while in dense stands delayed development (self-loops) had a strong effect on population growth; stasis and fecundity contributed most to the difference in λ between stand types. By petiole extension H. mantegazzianum may raise its leaves just above the resident vegetation. Therefore, younger stages develop faster in open stands, whereas strong competition by conspecific adults leads to longer generation times and a higher proportion of small individuals in dense stands. Disturbance due to extreme climatic conditions in summer 2003 equalised population dynamics of both stand types. Life-cycle variation between stand types makes it difficult to infer simple management rules. However, our data suggest that small and/or open stands of H. mantegazzianum may eventually serve as initials for further spread after land-use changes, whereas dense stands are stable and may represent sources of propagules.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Biermann R, Daniëls FJA (1997) Changes in a lichen-rich dry sand grassland vegetation with special reference to lichen synusiae and Campylopus introflexus. Phytocoenologia 27:257–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey JM (1999) Phenology and long-term control of Heracleum mantegazzianum. Hydrobiologia 415:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1996) Analysis of life table response experiments II. Alternative parameterizations for size- and stage-structured models. Ecol Model 88:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models. Construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogée J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernshofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, De Noblet N, Friend AD, Friedlingstein P, Grünwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1986) The population biology of invaders. Philos Trans R Soc B 314:711–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA (2003) Biotic globalization: does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity? BioScience 53:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Thompson K (2000) Eight ways to be a colonizer; two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:226–230

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon H, Plaisir A, van Groenendael J, Caswell H (1986) Elasticity: the relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology 67:1427–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PM (1993) The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 290–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson SW, Tiley GED, Philp B (1995) The impact of invasive weeds on riverine flora in Scotland: a preliminary report. Report to Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh

  • Hoffmann G (1991) Die Untersuchungen von Böden—Methodenbuch 1. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood GM (2005) PopTools version 2.6.7. Available on the internet. URL http://www.cse.csiro.au/poptools

  • Hüls J (2005) Populationsbiologische Untersuchung von Heracleum mantegazzianum Somm. & Lev. in Subpopulationen unterschiedlicher Individuendichte. Dissertation, Giessen University

  • Hyatt LA, Araki S (2006) Comparative population dynamics of an invading species in its native and novel ranges. Biol Invasions 8:261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy P (2001) Competition. Kluwer, Dortrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbek J, Lecjaksová S, Härtel H (1994) The integration of Heracleum mantegazzianum into the vegetation—an example from central Bohemia. Biologia 49:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop AL, Horvitz CC (2005) Projection matrix analysis of the demography of an invasive, nonnative shrub (Ardisia elliptica). Ecology 86:2661–2672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2002) Biologische Invasionen in Deutschland: zur Rolle nichteinheimischer Pflanzen. Neobiota 1:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinke L, Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Perglová I (2005) Seed bank of an invasive alien, Heracleum mantegazzianum, and its seasonal dynamics. Seed Sci Res 15:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, D’Antonio CM (2003) Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv Biol 17:322–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy PB, Coombs EM (1999) Biological control of plant invaders: regional patterns, field experiments, and structured population models. Ecol Appl 9:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1991) Randomization and Monte–Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody ME, Mack RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J Appl Ecol 25:1009–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Global change and invasive species: where do we go from here? In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, pp. 425–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcová L, Perglová I, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2005) Effects of fruit position on fruit mass and seed germination in the alien species Heracleum mantegazzianum (Apiaceae) and the implications for its invasion. Acta Oecol 28:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2005) Aerial photographs as a tool for assessing the regional dynamics of the invasive plant species Heracleum mantegazzianum. J Appl Ecol 42:1042–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehrbass N, Winkler E, Pergl J, Perglová I, Pyšek P (2006) Empirical and virtual investigation of the population dynamics of an alien plant under the constraints of local carrying capacity: Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic. Perspect Plant Ecol 7:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome AE, Noble IR (1986) Ecological and physiological characters of invading species. In: Groves RH, Burden JJ (eds) Ecology of biological invasions: an Australian perspective. Australian Academy of Sciences, Canberra, pp. 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen C, Ravn HP, Nentwig W, Wade M (2005) The Giant Hogweed best practice manual. Guidelines for the management and control of an invasive weed in Europe. Forest & Landscape Denmark, Hoersholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsmann J (1996) Heracleum mantegazzianum SOMMIER & LEVIER (Apiaceae) in Deutschland—Untersuchungen zur Biologie, Verbreitung, Morphologie und Taxonomie. Feddes Repertorium 107:557–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte A, Franke R (1998) The ecology of the Caucasian herbaceous perennial Heracleum mantegazzianum Somm. et Lev. (Giant Hogweed) in cultural ecosystems of Central Europe. Phytocoenologia 28:205–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte A, Maul P (2005) Verbreitungsschwerpunkte und strukturelle Einnischung der Stauden-Lupine (Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.) in Bergwiesen der Rhön. Tuexenia 25:151–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM (2000) Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: A matrix model approach. Ecol Appl 10:726–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pergl J, Hüls J, Perglová I, Eckstein RL, Pyšek P, Otte A (2007) Population dynamics of Heracleum mantegazzianum. In: Pyšek P, Cock MJW, Nentwig W, Ravn HP, (eds) Ecology and management of Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum). CABInterbational, Wallingford, UK, pp. 92–111

  • Pira E, Romano C, Sulotto F, Pavan I, Monaco E (1989) Heracleum mantegazzianum growth phases and furocoumarin content. Contact Dermatitis 21:300–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1991) Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic: the dynamics of spreading from the historical perspective. Folia Geobot 26:439–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, LeRoy Poff N, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schepker H, Kowarik I (2002) Bekämpfung von Neophyten in Niedersachsen: Ursachen, Umfang, Erfolg. Neobiota 1:343–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Kelly D (1998) Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand. Ecol Appl 8:824–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes P (1952) A physiological study on embryo development in Heracleum sphondylium L. I. The effect of temperature on embryo development. Ann Bot 16:441–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H (2001) Neophyten. Bauhinia 15:19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappeiner U, Cernusca A (1996) Microclimate and fluxes of water vapour, sensible heat and carbon dioxide in structurally differing subalpine plant communities in the Central Caucasus. Plant Cell Environ 19:403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BW, Irwin RE (2004) Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17725–17730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele J, Otte A (2006) Analysis of habitats and communities invaded by Heracleum mantegazzianum Somm. et Lev. (Giant Hogweed) in Germany. Phytocoenologia 36:281–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiley GED, Dodd FS, Wade PM (1996) Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier. J Ecol 84:297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Groenendael J, de Kroon H, Kalisz S, Tuljapurkar S (1994) Loop analysis: evaluating life history pathways in population projection matrices. Ecology 75:2410–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker NF, Hulme PE, Hoelzel AR (2003) Population genetics of an invasive species, Heracleum mantegazzianum: implications for the role of life history, demographics and independent introductions. Mol Ecol 12:1747–1756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle GM (1998) A graph theory approach to demographic loop analysis. Ecology 79:2539–2549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1999) Invasions. Ecography 22:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are much indebted to Josef Scholz-vom Hofe for help in the field and the laboratory, to Jan Thiele for insightful comments and Ralph Allen for correcting our English. This study was funded within the 5th EU framework programme ‘Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development—Assessing and Conserving Biodiversity’ (project no. EVK2-CT-2001-00128). All help is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Ecology and Resource Management, Interdisciplinary Research Centre, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Jörg Hüls, Annette Otte & R. Lutz Eckstein

Authors
  1. Jörg Hüls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annette Otte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Lutz Eckstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Lutz Eckstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hüls, J., Otte, A. & Eckstein, R.L. Population life-cycle and stand structure in dense and open stands of the introduced tall herb Heracleum mantegazzianum . Biol Invasions 9, 799–811 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9082-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9082-9

Keywords

  • Apiaceae
  • Elasticity
  • Intraspecific competition
  • Life table response experiment (LTRE)
  • Loop analysis
  • Management
  • Matrix models
  • Vital rates