Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geographic Tools for Eradication Programs of Insular Non-native Mammals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-native mammals are major drivers of ecosystem change and biodiversity loss; this is especially apparent on islands. However, techniques exist to remove non-native mammals, providing a powerful conservation tool. Conservation practitioners are now targeting larger islands for restoration. Leveraging existing and developing new techniques and technologies will prove critical to successful eradications on large islands. Using the removal of introduced goats (Capra hircus) from Santiago Island, Galápagos as a case study, we present a suite of Geographic Information System (GIS) tools that aid island conservation actions. GIS tools were incorporated into the three phases of the eradication campaign: planning, hunting, and monitoring. Further, these tools were adopted for three eradication techniques: ground-based hunting, aerial hunting by helicopter, and Judas goats. These geographic approaches provide a foundation for statistical, spatial, and economic analyses that should increase the capability and efficiency of removal campaigns. Given limited conservation funds and the dire status of many insular species, efficiently removing non-native mammals from islands is of paramount global conservation importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson IAE (1985) The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effect on island avifaunas. In: Moors PJ (ed) Conservation of island birds. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, pp 35–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson IAE (2001) Introduced mammals and models for restoration. Biol Conserv 99:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K, Baxter G, Murray P, Coblentz BE, Donlan CJ (2006) Development of a prolonged estrus effect for use in Judas goats. Appl Anim Behav Sci, in press

  • Campbell K, Baxter G, Murray P, Coblentz BE, Donlan CJ, Carrion V (2005) Increasing the efficacy of Judas goats by sterilisation and pregnancy termination. Wildl Res 32:737–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K, Donlan CJ (2005) Feral goat eradications on islands. Conserv Biol 19:1362–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell K, Donlan CJ, Cruz F, Carrion V (2004) Eradication of feral goats Capra hircus from Pinta Island, Galápagos, Ecuador. Oryx 38:328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KJ (2002) Advances in Judas goat methodology in the Galápagos Islands: manipulating the animals. In: Gregory J, Kyle B, Simmons M (eds) Judas workshop 2002. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Otago Conservancy, Dunedin, pp 70–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquenot D, McIlroy J, Korn T (1996) Managing vertebrate pests: feral pigs. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Coblentz BE (1978) The effects of feral goats (Capra hircus) on island ecosystems. Biol Conserv 13:279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coblentz BE, Baber DW (1987) Biology and control of feral pigs on Isla Santiago, Galapagos, Ecuador. J␣Appl Ecol 24:403–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz F, Donlan CJ, Campbell K, Carrion V (2005) Conservation action in the Galápagos: Feral pig (Sus scrofa) eradication from Santiago Island. Biol Conserv 121:473–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz JB, Cruz F (1987) Conservation of the dark rumped petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia) in the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. Biol Conserv 42:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1989) Overview of recent extinctions. In: Western D, Pearl MC (eds) Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Donlan CJ, Tershy BR, Campbell K, Cruz F (2003) Research for requiems: the need for more collaborative action in invasive species management and conservation. Conserv Biol 17:1850–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donlan CJ, Tershy BR, Croll DA (2002) Islands and introduced herbivores: conservation action as ecosystem experimentation. J Appl Ecol 39:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenhard T (1988) Introduced birds and mammals and their ecological effects. Swed Wildl Res Viltrevy 13:1–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, British Natural History Museum, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (1992) Global biodiversity: status of the earth’s living resources: a report, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London

  • Henderson CR (2002) OziExplorer v3.95.3b. In. http://www.oziexplorer.com

  • Howald GR, Faulkner KR, Tershy B, Keitt B, Gellerman H, Creel EM, Grinnel M, Ortega S, Croll DA (2005) Eradication of black rat from Anacapa Island: biological and social considerations. In: Garcelon DK, Schwemm CA (eds) Proceedings of the sixth California Islands Symposium. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Arcata, California, pp 299–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulbert IAR, French J (2001) The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping. J Appl Ecol 38:869–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacPhee RDE, Flemming C (1999) Requim AEternam: the last five hundred years of mammalian species extinctions. In: MacPhee RDE (ed) Extinctions in near time: causes, contexts, and consequences. Kluwer Publishing, New York, pp 333–371

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland PJ (2002) Preparation for the eradication of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) from Campbell Island, New Zealand. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland Switzerland, p 409

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman D (2002) G7toWin v.A.00.120. In. http://www.g7towin.home.attbi.com

  • Nogales M, Martín A, Tershy BR, Donlan CJ, Veitch D, Puerta N, Wood B, Alonso J (2004) A review of feral cat eradication on islands. Conserv Biol 18:310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RB, Cooke BD, Campbell K, Carrion V, Marquez C, Snell HL (2005) Eradicating feral cats to protect Galapagos land iguanas: methods and strategies. Pac Conserv Biol 11:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainbolt RE, Coblentz BE (1999) Restoration of insular ecosystems: control of feral goats on Aldabra Atoll, Republic of Seychelles. Biol Invas 1:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seigal N (2001) Nickseigal.createtriangulararray.ave, http://www.esri.com/downloads.

  • Simberloff D (2001) Eradication of island invasives: practical actions and results achieved. Trends Ecol Evol 16:273–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RH, Thomas BW (1989) Eradication of Norway rats Rattus norvegicus from Hawea Island, Fjiordland, using brodifacoum. NZ J Ecol 12:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace GIS (2002) CreateThiessenPoly.dll. In. http://www.esri.com

  • Towns DR, Atkinson IAE, Daughtery CH (1990) Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands: papers presented at conference on ecological restoration of New Zealand islands, University of Auckland, 20–24 November 1989, Auckland, New Zealand. Dept. of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Towns DR, Broome KG (2003) From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. NZ J Ecol 30:377–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Veitch CR, Clout MN (2002) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. In: World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was accomplished with the support of Project ECU/00/G31 “Control of Invasive Species in the Galápagos Archipelago”, a donation from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) to the Ecuadorian Government, represented by the Ministry of Environment. The Project is implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and is executed by the Galápagos National Park Service (GNPS), Charles Darwin Foundation (aisbl; CDF), National Institute for Galápagos and Ecuadorian Service for Agriculture and Livestock Sanitation—Galápagos. The opinions expressed herein belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of GEF/UNDP. Additional support was provided by Cornell University, Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies, Howard Snell (University of New Mexico), Charles Darwin Foundation Inc (now named Galapagos Conservancy), Lindblad Expeditions, European Friends of Galápagos Organizations, the GNPS, TAME Airlines, and the CDF. We thank Prohunt New Zealand Ltd for valuable inputs and for the initial development of the rastrillo hunting method. Bruce Coblentz and an anonymous reviewer improved this manuscript. CDF contribution 1016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Josh Donlan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavoie, C., Donlan, C.J., Campbell, K. et al. Geographic Tools for Eradication Programs of Insular Non-native Mammals. Biol Invasions 9, 139–148 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9011-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9011-y

Keywords

Navigation