Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Relative Importance of Wetland type Versus Anthropogenic Activities in Determining Site Invasibility

  • 130 Accesses

  • 12 Citations


We assessed wetland invasibility by conducting surveys of three wetlands in each of five categories (riverine, depression, lacustrine fringe, mineral flat, and seepage slope). Invasibility was measured as the number of invasive species present, percent of plant species classified as invasive, percent cover of invasive plants, and percent of total cover represented by invasive species. The working hypothesis for this study was that certain types of wetlands (e.g., lacustrine fringe and riverine) would be more prone to invasion than others (spring-seep/slope wetlands or mineral flat wetlands). No significant differences were found among wetland types in any of the invasion metrics evaluated, despite high average invasibility in the riverine and lacustrine fringe categories. However, invasion was correlated very strongly with a qualitative index of anthropogenic modification to the surrounding landscape. A probable result of the substantial influence of human activities on wetland invasion in this study was that effects potentially attributable to greater opportunity for dispersal in certain types of wetlands were obscured. Another factor that likely contributed to the lack of differences among wetland types was the high variability in human activities observed among wetlands within types. These results further highlight the overwhelming contributions of anthropogenic habitat modification and human-assisted dispersal of invasive species to the currently observed homogenization of natural ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Brewer JS and Cralle SP (2003). Phosphorus addition reduces invasion of a longleaf pine savanna (Southeastern USA) by a non-indigenous grass (Imperata cylindrica). Plant Ecology 167: 237–245

  2. Brooks ML (2003). Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 344–353

  3. Brown JH, Whitham TG, Morgan Ernest SK and Gehring CA (2001). Complex species interactions and the dynamics of ecological systems: long-term experiments. Science 293: 643–650

  4. (2002). Hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions: guidelines for developing regional guidebooks; Chapter 1, Introduction and Overview of the Hydrogeomorphic Approach. ERDC/EL TR-02–3. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS

  5. Faden RB (2000) Commelinaceae R. Brown. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds) Flora of North America north of Mexico, p 195. Oxford University Press, New York

  6. Flora of North America Editorial Committee, (eds) (1993) Flora of North America North of Mexico, 7 vols. New York and Oxford, Retrieved from http://www.efloras.org on 05 July 2005.

  7. Foster BL, Smith VH, Dickson TL and Hildebrand T (2002). Invasibility and compositional stability in a grassland community: relationships to diversity and extrinsic factors. Oikos 99: 300–307

  8. Gelbard JL and Belnap J (2003). Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conservation Biology 17: 420–432

  9. Gelbard JL and Harrison S (2003). Roadless habitats as refuges for native grasslands: interactions with soil, aspect and grazing. Ecological Applications 13: 404–415

  10. Hastings A (2001). Transient dynamics and persistence of ecological systems. Ecology Letters 4: 215–220

  11. Hastings A and Higgins K (1994). Persistence of transients in spatially structured ecological models. Science 263: 1133–1136

  12. Hodkinson DJ and Thompson K (1997). Plant dispersal: the role of man. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 1484–1496

  13. Jules ES, Kauffman MJ, Ritts WD and Carroll AL (2002). Spread of an invasive pathogen over a variable landscape: a nonnative root rot on Port Orford cedar. Ecology 83: 3167–3181

  14. Larson DL (2003). Native weeds and exotic plants: relationships to disturbance in mixed-grass prairie. Plant Ecology 169: 317–333

  15. Lonsdale WM (1999). Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522–1536

  16. Lopez RD and Fennessy MS (2002). Testing the floristic quality assessment index as an indicator of wetland condition. Ecological Applications 12: 487–497

  17. Lopez RD, Davis CB and Fennessy MS (2002). Ecological relationships between landscape change and plant guilds in depressional wetlands. Landscape Ecology 7: 43–56

  18. Madsen J (2004) Invasive Aquatic Plants: A Threat to Mississippi Water Resources. In: McBride D (ed) Proceedings of the 34th Mississippi Water Resources Conference, April 2004. Mississippi State University, Mississippi

  19. Milbau A, Nijs I, Van Peer L, Reheul D and DeCauwer B (2003). Disentangling invasiveness and invasibility during invasion in synthesized grassland communities. New Phytologist 159: 657–667

  20. Miller JH, Chambliss EB and Bargeron CT (2004) Invasive Plants of the Thirteen Southern States. Invasive.org: Invasive and Exotic Species of North America. Retrieved from http://www.invasive.org/ on 04 July 2005

  21. Owens CH, Madsen JD, Smart RM and Stewart RM (2001). Dispersal of native and nonnative aquatic plant species in the San Marcos River, Texas. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 39: 75–79

  22. Prieur-Richard AH, Lavorel S, Dos Santos A and Grigulis K (2002). Mechanisms of resistance of Mediterranean annual communities to invasion by Conyza bonariensis: effects of native functional composition. Oikos 99: 338–346

  23. Roberts DE, Church AG and Cummins SP (1999). Invasion of Egeria into the Hawkesbury-Nepean River, Australia. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 37: 31–34

  24. (1998). Weeds of the United States and Canada. Southern Weed Science Society, Champaign, Illinois

  25. (2002). Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using vegetation to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. US EPA, Washington, DC

  26. USDA NRCS (2004) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. Retrieved from http://plants.usda.gov on 05 July 2005

  27. With KA (2002). The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conservation Biology 16: 1192–1203

  28. Zedler JB and Kercher S (2004). Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists and outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23: 431–452

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Gary Ervin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ervin, G., Smothers, M., Holly, C. et al. Relative Importance of Wetland type Versus Anthropogenic Activities in Determining Site Invasibility. Biol Invasions 8, 1425–1432 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-0006-5

Download citation


  • anthropogenic disturbance
  • aquatic plants
  • dispersal
  • invasion indices
  • invasive species
  • landscape characteristics
  • wetland plants