Can R*s Predict Invasion in Semi-arid Grasslands?
- 77 Downloads
We estimated R*s and tested the applicability of R* theory on nonindigenous plant invasions in semi-arid rangeland. R* is the concentration of a resource that a species requires to survive in a habitat. R* theory predicts that a species with a lower R* for the most limiting resource will competitively displace a species with a higher R* under equilibrium conditions. In a greenhouse, annual sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), bluebunch wheatgrass (Agropyron spicatum Pursh), and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa Lam.) were grown in monoculture and 2- and 3-species mixtures for three growth periods in an attempt to reduce soil NO3-N concentrations below each species’ R*. At the end of each growth period, aboveground biomass by species and soil plant available nitrogen were sampled. Decreasing biomass coupled with decreasing soil plant available nitrogen was used to quantify R*s for the three species. R*s for annual sunflower, bluebunch wheatgrass, and spotted knapweed were estimated to be 0.6±0.16 ppm NO 3 − , less than 0.05 ppm NO 3 − , and 0.6±0.13 ppm NO 3 − , respectively. Estimated R*s did not predict the outcome of competition among species. To successfully predict plant community dynamics on semi-arid rangeland with and without the presence of a nonindigenous invasive species, a more comprehensive model that includes mechanisms in addition to competition may have to be considered. We speculate that R* theory may prove most useful for predicting the outcome of competition within functional groups.
KeywordsAgropyron spicatum Centaurea maculosa Helianthus annuus nitrogen plant competition R* theory spotted knapweed succession
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- SA Barber, Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: a Mechanistic Approach. New York, NY: John Wiley (1995).Google Scholar
- JL Charley, Mineral cycling in rangeland ecosystems. In: RE Sosebee (ed.) Rangeland Plant Physiology. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management (1977) pp. 215-256Google Scholar
- TK Chicoine, PK Fay and GA Neilsen, Predicting weed migration from soil and climate maps. Weed Science 34 (1985) 57-61Google Scholar
- MJ Crawley, Life history and environment. In: MJ Crawley (ed.) Plant Ecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, Inc. (1997) pp. 73-131Google Scholar
- JS Dukes, Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecological Applications 12 (2002) 602-617Google Scholar
- C Elton, The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London, England: Methuen (1958).Google Scholar
- JP Grime, Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. London, England: John Wiley (1979).Google Scholar
- NC Johnson, DL Rowland, L Corkidi, LM Egerton-Warburton and EB Allen, Nitrogen enrichment alters mycorrhizal allocation at five mesic to semiarid grasslands. Ecology 84 (2003) 1895-1908Google Scholar
- H Lambers, FS Chapin III and TL Pons, Plant Physiological Ecology. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag (1998).Google Scholar
- J Levine and CM D’Antonio, Elton revisited: a review of the evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87 (1999) 1-12Google Scholar
- Mueggler WF and Stewart WL (1980) Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana. USDA FS General Technical Report INT-66, 154 pp.Google Scholar
- RL Mulvaney, Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: DL Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3-Chemical Methods. Madison, WI: SSSA Book Series 5 (1996) pp. 1123-1184Google Scholar
- J Neter, MH Kutner, CJ Nachtsheim and W Wasserman, Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago, IL: Richard Irwin, Inc. (1996).Google Scholar
- RG Peterson, Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker (1985).Google Scholar
- SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS fInst. (1990).Google Scholar
- RL Sheley, JS Jacobs and MF Carpinelli, Spotted knapweed. In: RL Sheley and JK Petroff (eds.) Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press (1999) pp. 350-361Google Scholar
- CS Tang, WF Cai, K Kohl and RK Nishimoto, Plant stress and allelopathy. In: KM Inderjit, M Dakshini and FA Einhellig (eds.) Allelopathy: Organisms, Processes, and Applications. Washington: American Chemical Society (1995) pp. 142-157Google Scholar
- D Tilman, Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1982).Google Scholar
- D Tilman, Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1988).Google Scholar