Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the maximum compressive strength, the modulus of elasticity, pH variation, ionic release, radiopacity and biological response of an experimental endodontic repair cement based on 45S5 Bioglass®. An in vitro and in vivo study with an experimental endodontic repair cement containing 45S5 bioactive glass was conducted. There were three endodontic repair cement groups: 45S5 bioactive glass-based (BioG), zinc oxide-based (ZnO), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). In vitro tests were used to evaluate their physicochemical properties: compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, radiopacity, pH variation, and the ionic release of Ca+ and PO4. An animal model was used to evaluate the bone tissue response to endodontic repair cement. Statistical analysis included the unpaired t-test, one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. BioG showed the lowest compressive strength and ZnO showed the highest radiopacity among the groups, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the modulus of elasticity among the groups. BioG and MTA maintained an alkaline pH during the 7 days of evaluation, both at pH 4 and in a pH 7 buffered solutions. PO4 was elevated in BioG, peaking at 7 days (p < 0.05). Histological analysis showed less intense inflammatory reactions and new bone formation in MTA. BioG showed inflammatory reactions that decreased over time. These findings suggest that the BioG experimental cement had good physicochemical characteristics and biocompatibility required for bioactive endodontic repair cement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
ANSI (1984) American National Standards Institute. Specification no 57 for endodontic filling materials. J Am Dent Assoc 108:88
Arjunan A, Demetriou M, Baroutaji A, Wang C (2020) Mechanical performance of highly permeable laser melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 102:103517
Arjunan A, Baroutaji A, Praveen AS, Robinson J, Wang C (2022) Classification of biomaterial functionality. Encycl Smart Mat 1:86–102
Azenha MR, Peitl O, Barros VMR (2010) Bone response to biosilicates® with different crystal phases. Braz Dent J 21:383–389
Bellucci D, Cannillo V, Sola A (2011) A new potassium-based bioactive glass: sintering behaviour and possible applications for bioceramic scaffolds. Ceram Int 37:145–157
Bingel L, Groh D, Karpukhina N, Brauer DS (2015) Influence of dissolution medium pH on ion release and apatite formation of Bioglass® 45S5. Mat Let 143:279–282
Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Papaioannou S, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR (2004) Biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int End J 37:699–704
Cardoso OS, Meier MM, Carvalho EM, Ferreira PVC, Gavini G, Zago PMW, Grazziotin-Soares R, Menezes ASD, Carvalho CN, Bauer J (2022) Synthesis and characterization of experimental endodontic sealers containing bioactive glasses particles of NbG or 45S5. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 125:104971
Carneiro KK, Araujo TP, Carvalho EM, Meier MM, Tanaka A, Carvalho CN, Bauer J (2018) Bioactivity and properties of an adhesive system functionalized with an experimental niobium-based glass. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 78:188–195
Carvalho CN, Freire LG, de Carvalho APL, Duarte MAH, Bauer J, Gavini G (2016) Ions release and pH of calcium hydroxide–, chlorhexidine– and bioactive glass–based endodontic medicaments. Braz Dent J 27:325–331
Cunha RS, Abe FC, Araujo RA, Fregnani ER, Bueno CE (2011) Treatment of inflammatory external root resorption resulting from dental avulsion and pulp necrosis: clinical case report. Gen Dent 59:e101–e104
Duarte MAH, El-Kadre GDO, Vivan RR, Tanomaru JMG, Tanomaru-Filho M, Moraes IG (2009) Radiopacity of portland cement associated with different radiopacifying agents. J Endodont 35:737–740
Heboyan A, Avetisyan A, Karobari MI, Marya A, Khurshid Z, Rokaya D, Zafar MS, Fernandes GVDO (2022) Tooth root resorption: a review. Sci Prog 105:00368504221109217
Heid S, Stoessel PR, Tauböck TT, Stark WJ, Zehnder M, Mohn D (2016) Incorporation of particulate bioactive glasses into a dental root canal sealer. Biomed Glas 2:29–37
Hench LL, Jones JR (2015) Bioactive glasses: frontiers and challenges. Front Bioeng Biotech 3:194
Hunag TH, Lii CK, Kao CT (2001) Root canal sealers cause cytotoxicity and oxidative damage in hepatocytes. J Biomed Mat Res 54:390–395
Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomat 9:4457–4486
Jung MK, Park SC, Kim YJ, Park JT, Knowles JC, Park JH, Dashnyam K, Jun SK, Lee HH, Lee JH (2022) Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealer reinforced with bioactive glass nanoparticles to improve biological properties. Pharmac 14:1903
Krishnan V, Lakshmi T (2013) Bioglass: a novel biocompatible innovation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 4:78–83
Mallmann A, Ataíde JCO, Amoedo R, Rocha PV, Jacques LB (2007) Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements using different specimen dimensions. Braz Oral Res 21:204–208
Mehrvarzfar P, Akhavan H, Rastgarian H, Soleymanpour R, Ahmadi A (2011) An in vitro comparative study on the antimicrobial effects of bioglass 45S5 vs. calcium hydroxide on Enterococcus faecalis. Iran Endodont J 6:29–33
Melo LGN, Nagata MJH, Bosco AF, Ribeiro LL, Leite CM (2005) Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials: a histological and histometric study in rat tibias. Clin Oral Imp Res 16:683–691
Mladenović Ž, Johansson A, Willman B, Shahabi K, Björn E, Ransjö M (2014) Soluble silica inhibits osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vitro. Acta Biomat 10:406–418
Natale LC, Rodrigues MC, Xavier TA, Simões A, De Souza DN, Braga RR (2015) Ion release and mechanical properties of calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials used for pulp capping. Int Endodont J 48:89–94
Par M, Gubler A, Attin T, Tarle Z, Tarle A, Tauböck TT (2022) Ion release and hydroxyapatite precipitation of resin composites functionalized with two types of bioactive glass. J Dent 118:103950
Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010a) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endodont 36:16–27
Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010b) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endodont 36:400–413
Rabiee SM, Nazparvar N, Azizian M, Vashaee D, Tayebi L (2015) Effect of ion substitution on properties of bioactive glasses: a review. Ceram Int 41:7241–7251
Ribeiro MRG, Thomaz ÉBAF, Lima DM, Leitão TJ, Bauer J, Souza SDFC (2017) Chlorhexidine prevents root dentine mineral loss and fracture caused by calcium hydroxide over time. Int J Dent 2017:1579652
Vogel GL, Chow LC, Brown WE (1983) A microanalytical procedure for the determination of calcium, phosphate and fluoride in enamel biopsy samples. Caries Res 7:23–31
Washio A, Morotomi T, Yoshii S, Kitamura C (2019) Bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer as a promising root canal filling material without semisolid core materials. Materials 12:3967
White JD, Lacefield WR, Chavers LS, Eleazer PD (2002) The effect of three commonly used endodontic materials on the strength and hardness of root dentin. J Endodont 28:828–830
Xie X, Wang L, Xing D, Zhang K, Weir MD, Liu H, Bai Y, Xu HHK (2017) Novel dental adhesive with triple benefits of calcium phosphate recharge, protein-repellent and antibacterial functions. Dent Mat 33:553–563
Zhang D, Leppäranta O, Munukka E, Ylänen H, Viljanen MK, Eerola E, Hupa M, Hupa L (2010) Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mat Res Part A 93:475–483
Funding
This work was supported by the Foundation for Research and Scientific and Technological Development of Maranhão (FAPEMA) [Grant number 01451/16], and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Brasil (CAPES) [Finance Code 001].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MRGR: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, supervision, writing—review and editing. HGG: data curation, formal analysis, investigation. ANB: data curation, formal analysis, investigation. AGAJ: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft. ÉMP: formal analysis, investigation, methodology. VR: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, supervision, writing—review and editing. JB: formal analysis, investigation, methodology. SdFCS: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of CEUMA University (no. 06/2017).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ribeiro, M.R.G., Guilherme, H.G., Braga, A.N. et al. Physicochemical and histological analysis of an experimental endodontic repair material containing 45S5 bioactive glass. Biotechnol Lett 45, 799–809 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-023-03391-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-023-03391-x