Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physicochemical and histological analysis of an experimental endodontic repair material containing 45S5 bioactive glass

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the maximum compressive strength, the modulus of elasticity, pH variation, ionic release, radiopacity and biological response of an experimental endodontic repair cement based on 45S5 Bioglass®. An in vitro and in vivo study with an experimental endodontic repair cement containing 45S5 bioactive glass was conducted. There were three endodontic repair cement groups: 45S5 bioactive glass-based (BioG), zinc oxide-based (ZnO), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). In vitro tests were used to evaluate their physicochemical properties: compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, radiopacity, pH variation, and the ionic release of Ca+ and PO4. An animal model was used to evaluate the bone tissue response to endodontic repair cement. Statistical analysis included the unpaired t-test, one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. BioG showed the lowest compressive strength and ZnO showed the highest radiopacity among the groups, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the modulus of elasticity among the groups. BioG and MTA maintained an alkaline pH during the 7 days of evaluation, both at pH 4 and in a pH 7 buffered solutions. PO4 was elevated in BioG, peaking at 7 days (p < 0.05). Histological analysis showed less intense inflammatory reactions and new bone formation in MTA. BioG showed inflammatory reactions that decreased over time. These findings suggest that the BioG experimental cement had good physicochemical characteristics and biocompatibility required for bioactive endodontic repair cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • ANSI (1984) American National Standards Institute. Specification no 57 for endodontic filling materials. J Am Dent Assoc 108:88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjunan A, Demetriou M, Baroutaji A, Wang C (2020) Mechanical performance of highly permeable laser melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 102:103517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arjunan A, Baroutaji A, Praveen AS, Robinson J, Wang C (2022) Classification of biomaterial functionality. Encycl Smart Mat 1:86–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Azenha MR, Peitl O, Barros VMR (2010) Bone response to biosilicates® with different crystal phases. Braz Dent J 21:383–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellucci D, Cannillo V, Sola A (2011) A new potassium-based bioactive glass: sintering behaviour and possible applications for bioceramic scaffolds. Ceram Int 37:145–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bingel L, Groh D, Karpukhina N, Brauer DS (2015) Influence of dissolution medium pH on ion release and apatite formation of Bioglass® 45S5. Mat Let 143:279–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Papaioannou S, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR (2004) Biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int End J 37:699–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso OS, Meier MM, Carvalho EM, Ferreira PVC, Gavini G, Zago PMW, Grazziotin-Soares R, Menezes ASD, Carvalho CN, Bauer J (2022) Synthesis and characterization of experimental endodontic sealers containing bioactive glasses particles of NbG or 45S5. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 125:104971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro KK, Araujo TP, Carvalho EM, Meier MM, Tanaka A, Carvalho CN, Bauer J (2018) Bioactivity and properties of an adhesive system functionalized with an experimental niobium-based glass. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 78:188–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho CN, Freire LG, de Carvalho APL, Duarte MAH, Bauer J, Gavini G (2016) Ions release and pH of calcium hydroxide–, chlorhexidine– and bioactive glass–based endodontic medicaments. Braz Dent J 27:325–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha RS, Abe FC, Araujo RA, Fregnani ER, Bueno CE (2011) Treatment of inflammatory external root resorption resulting from dental avulsion and pulp necrosis: clinical case report. Gen Dent 59:e101–e104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte MAH, El-Kadre GDO, Vivan RR, Tanomaru JMG, Tanomaru-Filho M, Moraes IG (2009) Radiopacity of portland cement associated with different radiopacifying agents. J Endodont 35:737–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heboyan A, Avetisyan A, Karobari MI, Marya A, Khurshid Z, Rokaya D, Zafar MS, Fernandes GVDO (2022) Tooth root resorption: a review. Sci Prog 105:00368504221109217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid S, Stoessel PR, Tauböck TT, Stark WJ, Zehnder M, Mohn D (2016) Incorporation of particulate bioactive glasses into a dental root canal sealer. Biomed Glas 2:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hench LL, Jones JR (2015) Bioactive glasses: frontiers and challenges. Front Bioeng Biotech 3:194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunag TH, Lii CK, Kao CT (2001) Root canal sealers cause cytotoxicity and oxidative damage in hepatocytes. J Biomed Mat Res 54:390–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomat 9:4457–4486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung MK, Park SC, Kim YJ, Park JT, Knowles JC, Park JH, Dashnyam K, Jun SK, Lee HH, Lee JH (2022) Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealer reinforced with bioactive glass nanoparticles to improve biological properties. Pharmac 14:1903

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan V, Lakshmi T (2013) Bioglass: a novel biocompatible innovation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 4:78–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mallmann A, Ataíde JCO, Amoedo R, Rocha PV, Jacques LB (2007) Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements using different specimen dimensions. Braz Oral Res 21:204–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrvarzfar P, Akhavan H, Rastgarian H, Soleymanpour R, Ahmadi A (2011) An in vitro comparative study on the antimicrobial effects of bioglass 45S5 vs. calcium hydroxide on Enterococcus faecalis. Iran Endodont J 6:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo LGN, Nagata MJH, Bosco AF, Ribeiro LL, Leite CM (2005) Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials: a histological and histometric study in rat tibias. Clin Oral Imp Res 16:683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenović Ž, Johansson A, Willman B, Shahabi K, Björn E, Ransjö M (2014) Soluble silica inhibits osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vitro. Acta Biomat 10:406–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natale LC, Rodrigues MC, Xavier TA, Simões A, De Souza DN, Braga RR (2015) Ion release and mechanical properties of calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials used for pulp capping. Int Endodont J 48:89–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Par M, Gubler A, Attin T, Tarle Z, Tarle A, Tauböck TT (2022) Ion release and hydroxyapatite precipitation of resin composites functionalized with two types of bioactive glass. J Dent 118:103950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010a) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endodont 36:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010b) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endodont 36:400–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiee SM, Nazparvar N, Azizian M, Vashaee D, Tayebi L (2015) Effect of ion substitution on properties of bioactive glasses: a review. Ceram Int 41:7241–7251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro MRG, Thomaz ÉBAF, Lima DM, Leitão TJ, Bauer J, Souza SDFC (2017) Chlorhexidine prevents root dentine mineral loss and fracture caused by calcium hydroxide over time. Int J Dent 2017:1579652

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel GL, Chow LC, Brown WE (1983) A microanalytical procedure for the determination of calcium, phosphate and fluoride in enamel biopsy samples. Caries Res 7:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washio A, Morotomi T, Yoshii S, Kitamura C (2019) Bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer as a promising root canal filling material without semisolid core materials. Materials 12:3967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • White JD, Lacefield WR, Chavers LS, Eleazer PD (2002) The effect of three commonly used endodontic materials on the strength and hardness of root dentin. J Endodont 28:828–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Wang L, Xing D, Zhang K, Weir MD, Liu H, Bai Y, Xu HHK (2017) Novel dental adhesive with triple benefits of calcium phosphate recharge, protein-repellent and antibacterial functions. Dent Mat 33:553–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Leppäranta O, Munukka E, Ylänen H, Viljanen MK, Eerola E, Hupa M, Hupa L (2010) Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mat Res Part A 93:475–483

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Foundation for Research and Scientific and Technological Development of Maranhão (FAPEMA) [Grant number 01451/16], and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Brasil (CAPES) [Finance Code 001].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MRGR: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, supervision, writing—review and editing. HGG: data curation, formal analysis, investigation. ANB: data curation, formal analysis, investigation. AGAJ: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft. ÉMP: formal analysis, investigation, methodology. VR: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, supervision, writing—review and editing. JB: formal analysis, investigation, methodology. SdFCS: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vandilson Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of CEUMA University (no. 06/2017).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ribeiro, M.R.G., Guilherme, H.G., Braga, A.N. et al. Physicochemical and histological analysis of an experimental endodontic repair material containing 45S5 bioactive glass. Biotechnol Lett 45, 799–809 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-023-03391-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-023-03391-x

Keywords

Navigation