Advertisement

Biotechnology Letters

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 703–709 | Cite as

Properties important for solid–liquid separations change during the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw

  • Noah D. Weiss
  • Claus Felby
  • Lisbeth G. Thygesen
Original Research Paper

Abstract

Objectives

The biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into renewable fuels and chemicals provides new challenges for industrial scale processes. One such process, which has received little attention, but is of great importance for efficient product recovery, is solid–liquid separations, which may occur both after pretreatment and after the enzymatic hydrolysis steps. Due to the changing nature of the solid biomass during processing, the solid–liquid separation properties of the biomass can also change. The objective of this study was to show the effect of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose upon the water retention properties of pretreated biomass over the course of the hydrolysis reaction.

Results

Water retention value measurements, coupled with 1H NMR T2 relaxometry data, showed an increase in water retention and constraint of water by the biomass with increasing levels of cellulose hydrolysis. This correlated with an increase in the fines fraction and a decrease in particle size, suggesting that structural decomposition rather than changes in chemical composition was the most dominant characteristic.

Conclusions

With increased water retained by the insoluble fraction as cellulose hydrolysis proceeds, it may prove more difficult to efficiently separate hydrolysis residues from the liquid fraction with improved hydrolysis.

Keywords

Biomass-water interactions Dewatering Enzymatic hydrolysis Lignocellulosic biomass Solid–liquid separation Water retention value 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jack Saddler and Keith Gourlay at the University of British Columbia for their assistance with particle size measurements, and Novozymes A/S for providing enzymes for this study. This research was funded by the BioValue project, under the Strategic platform for innovation and research (SPIR), case no: 0603-00522B, as part of Denmark’s Innovation fund.

References

  1. Burke DR, Anderson J, Gilcrease PC, Menkhaus TJ (2011) Enhanced solid–liquid clarification of lignocellulosic slurries using polyelectrolyte flocculating agents. Biomass Bioenergy 35:391–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Humbird D (2011) Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stoverGoogle Scholar
  3. Humbird D, Mohagheghi A, Dowe N, Schell DJ (2010) Economic impact of total solids loading on enzymatic hydrolysis of dilute acid pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Prog 26:1245–1251.  https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.441 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kinnarinen T, Golmaei M, Häkkinen A (2013) Use of filter aids to improve the filterability of enzymatically hydrolyzed biomass suspensions. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:14955–14964.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4021057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kristensen JB, Felby C, Jørgensen H (2009) Determining yields in high solids enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 156:127–132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8375-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Larsen J, Østergaard Petersen M, Thirup L et al (2008) The IBUS process—lignocellulosic bioethanol close to a commercial reality. Chem Eng Technol 31:765–772.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200800048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lau MW, Bals BD, Chundawat SP et al (2012) An integrated paradigm for cellulosic biorefineries: utilization of lignocellulosic biomass as self-sufficient feedstocks for fuel, food precursors and saccharolytic enzyme production. Energy Environ Sci 5:7100–7110.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE03596K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leberknight J, Menkhaus TJ (2013) Membrane separations for solid–liquid clarification within lignocellulosic biorefining processes. Biotechnol Prog 29:1246–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1778 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Meiboom S, Gill D (1958) Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 29:688–691.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1716296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakagame S, Chandra RP, Saddler JN (2010) The effect of isolated lignins, obtained from a range of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates, on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 105:871–879.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22626 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Roche CM, Dibble CJ, Knutsen JS et al (2009) Particle concentration and yield stress of biomass slurries during enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings. Biotechnol Bioeng 104:290–300.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22381 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Scallan AM, Carles JE (1972) The correlation of the water retention value with the fibre saturation point. Sven Papperstidning 75:699–703Google Scholar
  13. Sievers DA, Tao L, Schell DJ (2014) Performance and techno-economic assessment of several solid-liquid separation technologies for processing dilute-acid pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 167:291–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.113 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sievers DA, Lischeske JJ, Biddy MJ, Stickel JJ (2015) A low-cost solid–liquid separation process for enzymatically hydrolyzed corn stover slurries. Bioresour Technol 187:37–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sievers DA, Kuhn EM, Tucker MP, McMillan JD (2017) Effects of dilute-acid pretreatment conditions on filtration performance of corn stover hydrolyzate. Bioresour Technol 243:474–480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.144 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, et al (2006) D: Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. In: Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar ResearchGoogle Scholar
  17. Thybring EE, Thygesen LG, Burgert I (2017) Hydroxyl accessibility in wood cell walls as affected by drying and re-wetting procedures. Cellulose 24:2375–2384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1278-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thygesen LG, Hidayat BJ, Johansen KS, Felby C (2011) Role of supramolecular cellulose structures in enzymatic hydrolysis of plant cell walls. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:975–983.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0870-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. van der Zwan T, Hu J, Saddler JN (2017) Mechanistic insights into the liquefaction stage of enzyme-mediated biomass deconstruction. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:2489–2496.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26381 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Weiss ND, Thygesen LG, Felby C et al (2017) Biomass-water interactions correlate to recalcitrance and are intensified by pretreatment: An investigation of water constraint and retention in pretreated spruce using low field NMR and water retention value techniques. Biotechnol Prog 33:146–153.  https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2398 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noah D. Weiss
    • 1
  • Claus Felby
    • 1
  • Lisbeth G. Thygesen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations