Biotechnology Letters

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 993–999 | Cite as

Enhancing substrate utilization and power production of a microbial fuel cell with nitrogen-doped carbon aerogel as cathode catalyst

  • Gábor Márk Tardy
  • Bálint Lóránt
  • Máté Lóka
  • Balázs Nagy
  • Krisztina László
Original Research Paper



Catalytic efficiency of a nitrogen-doped, mesoporous carbon aerogel cathode catalyst was investigated in a two-chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC) applying graphite felt as base material for cathode and anode, utilizing peptone as carbon source.


This mesoporous carbon aerogel containing catalyst layer on the cathode increased the maximum power density normalized to the anode volume to 2.7 times higher compared to the maximum power density obtained applying graphite felt cathode without the catalyst layer. At high (2 and 3) cathode/anode volume ratios, maximum power density exceeded 40 W m−3. At the same time, current density and specific substrate utilization rate increased by 58% resulting in 31.9 A m−3 and 18.8 g COD m−3 h−1, respectively (normalized to anode volume). Besides the increase of the power and the rate of biodegradation, the investigated catalyst decreased the internal resistance from the range of 450–600 to 350–370 Ω.


Although Pt/C catalyst proved to be more efficient, a considerable decrease in the material costs might be achieved by substituting it with nitrogen-doped carbon aerogel in MFCs. Such cathode still displays enhanced catalytic effect.


Cathode catalyst Electricity generation Exoelectrogenic biodegradation Microbial fuel cell Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon aerogel Power production 


  1. Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE (2006) Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 40:364–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jiang H, Luo S, Shi X, Dai M, Guo RB (2012) A novel microbial fuel cell and photobioreactor system for continous domestic wastewater treatment and bioelecticity generation. Biotechnol Lett 34:1269–1274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu B, Weinstein A, Kolln M, Garrett C, Wang L, Bagtzoglou A, Karra U, Li Y, Li B (2015) Distributed multiple-anodes benthic microbial fuel cell as reliable power source for subsea sensors. J Power Source 286:210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Logan BE (2009) Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:375–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lóránt B, Lóka M, Tardy GM (2015) Substrate concentration dependency of electricity production in microbial fuel cells. IEEE Xplore. In: Proc IYCE 2015, Pisa pp 1–7Google Scholar
  6. Morozan A, Jousselme B, Palacin S (2011) Low-platinum and platinum-free catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction at fuel cell cathodes. Energy Environ Sci 4:1238–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nagy B, Villar-Rodil S, Tascon JMD, Bakos I, Laszlo K (2016) Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon aerogels and implications for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reactions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 230:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Oh SE, Logan BE (2006) Proton exchange membrane and electrode surface areas as factors that affect power generation in microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 70:162–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Oh S, Min B, Logan BE (2004) Cathode performance as a factor in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 38:4900–4904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rabaey K, Verstraete W (2005) Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trend Biotechnol 23:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rahimnejad M, Adhami A, Darvari S, Zirepour A, Oh SE (2015) Microbial fuel cell as new technology for bioelectricity generation: a review. Alex Eng J 54:745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sevda S, Dominguez-Benetton X, Vanbroekhoven K, De Wever H, Sreekrishnan TR, Pant D (2013) High strength wastewater treatment accompanied by power generation using air cathode microbial fuel cell. Appl Energy 105:194–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tardy GM, Lóránt B, Lóka M (2017) Substrate concentration dependence of voltage and power production characteristics in two-chambered mediator-less microbial fuel cells with acetate and peptone substrates. Biotechnol Lett 39:383–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang Z, Nie H, Chen X, Chen X, Huang S (2013) Recent progress in doped carbon nanomaterials as effective cathode catalysts for fuel cell oxygen reduction reaction. J Power Source 236:238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yuan H, Hou Y, Wen Z, Guo X, Chen J, He Z (2015) Porous carbon nanosheets codoped with nitrogen and sulfur for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:18672–18678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhou M, Chi M, Luo J, He H, Jin T (2011) An overview of electrode materials in microbial fuel cells. J Power Source 196:4427–4435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhu D, Wang DB, Song T, Guo T, Ouyang P, Wei P, Xie J (2015) Effect of carbon nanotube modified cathode by electrophoretic deposition method on the performance of sediment microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol Lett 37:101–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gábor Márk Tardy
    • 1
  • Bálint Lóránt
    • 1
  • Máté Lóka
    • 1
  • Balázs Nagy
    • 2
  • Krisztina László
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food ScienceBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials ScienceBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations