Skip to main content
Log in

An improved protocol for the isolation of total genomic DNA from Labyrinthulomycetes

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many protocols have been used for extraction of DNA from Thraustochytrids. These generally involve the use of CTAB, phenol/chloroform and ethanol. They also feature mechanical grinding, sonication, N2 freezing or bead beating. However, the resulting chemical and physical damage to extracted DNA reduces its quality. The methods are also unsuitable for large numbers of samples. Commercially-available DNA extraction kits give better quality and yields but are expensive. Therefore, an optimized DNA extraction protocol was developed which is suitable for Thraustochytrids to both minimise expensive and time-consuming steps prior to DNA extraction and also to improve the yield. The most effective method is a combination of single bead in TissueLyser (Qiagen) and Proteinase K. Results were conclusive: both the quality and the yield of extracted DNA were higher than with any other method giving an average yield of 8.5 µg/100 mg biomass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed OB, Asghar AH, Elhassan MM (2014) Comparison of three DNA extraction methods for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of bacterial genomic DNA. Afr J Microbiol Res 8:598–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borman AM, Palmer M, Johnson EM (2012) Rapid methods for the extraction and archiving of molecular grade fungal genomic DNA. Methods Mol Biol 968:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith T, Allsopp MTEP, Chao EE (1994) Thraustochytrids are chromists, not fungi: 18S rRNA signatures of Heterokonta. Philos Trans R Soc B 346:387–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang KJL, Dunstan GA, Abell GCJ et al (2012) Biodiscovery of new Australian thraustochytrids for production of biodiesel and long-chain omega-3 oils. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:2215–2231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Mendoza D, Argumedo-Delira A, Morales-Trejo A et al (2010) A rapid method for isolation of total DNA from pathogenic filamentous plant fungi. Genet Mol Res 9:162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham GC, Mayers P, Henry RJ (1994) A simplified method for the preparation of fungal genomic DNA for PCR and RAPD analysis. Biotechniques 16:48–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honda D, Yokochi T, Nakahara T et al (1999) Molecular phylogeny of labyrinthulids and thraustochytrids based on the sequencing of 18S ribosomal RNA gene. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46:637–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen AN (2008) Compatible solutes and docosahexaenoic acid accumulation of thraustochytrids of the Aurantiochytrium group. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen AN, Aasen IM, Josefsen KD, Strom AR (2008) Accumulation of docosahexaenoic acid-rich lipid in thraustochytrid Aurantiochytrium sp strain T66: effects of N and P starvation and O-2 limitation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80:297–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura H, Fukuba T, Naganuma T (1999) Biomass of thraustochytrid protoctists in coastal water. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:27–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mo C, Rinkevich B (2001) A simple, reliable, and fast protocol for thraustochytrid DNA extraction. Mar Biotechnol 3:100–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss ST (1986) Biology and phylogeny of the Labyrinthulaes and Thraustochytriales. In: Moss ST (ed) The biology of marine fungi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 105–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmundson TW, Eyre CA, Hayden KM, Dhillon J, Garbelotto MM (2013) Back to basics: an evaluation of NaOH and alternative rapid DNA extraction protocols for DNA barcoding, genotyping, and disease diagnostics from fungal and oomycete samples. Mol Ecol Resour 13:66–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL http://www.R-project.org/

  • Tendulkar SR, Gupta A, Chattoo BB (2003) A simple protocol for isolation of fungal DNA. Biotechnol Lett 25:1941–1944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Tom Lewis (Tasmania), Solaris Bioscience (Tasmania) and Queensland University of Technology (Queensland) for their support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaminda Padmashantha Ranasinghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranasinghe, C.P., Harding, R. & Hargreaves, M. An improved protocol for the isolation of total genomic DNA from Labyrinthulomycetes. Biotechnol Lett 37, 685–690 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1712-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1712-1

Keywords

Navigation