Biotechnology Letters

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 405–411 | Cite as

Production of ethanol from thin stillage by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli

Original Research Paper

Abstract

Thin stillage is a by-product generated in large amounts during the production of ethanol that is rich in carbon sources like glycerol, glucose and maltose. Unfortunately, the fermentation of thin stillage results in a mixture of organic acids and ethanol and minimum utilization of glycerol, the latter a compound that can represent up to 80% of the available substrates in this stream. We report here the efficient production of ethanol from thin stillage by a metabolically engineered strain of Escherichia coli. Simultaneous utilization of glycerol and sugars was achieved by overexpressing either the fermentative or the respiratory glycerol-utilization pathway. However, amplification of the fermentative pathway (encoded by gldA and dhaKLM) led to more efficient consumption of glycerol and promoted the synthesis of reduced products, including ethanol. A previously constructed strain, EH05, containing mutations that prevented the accumulation of competing by-products (i.e. lactate, acetate, and succinate) and overexpressing the fermentative pathway for glycerol utilization [i.e. strain EH05 (pZSKLMgldA)], efficiently converted thin stillage supplemented with only mineral salts to ethanol at yields close to 85% of the theoretical maximum. Ethanol accounted for about 90% (w/w) of the product mixture. These results, along with the comparable performance of strain EH05 (pZSKLMgldA) in 0.5 and 5 l fermenters, indicate a great potential for the adoption of this process by the biofuels industry.

Keywords

Biofuels Metabolic engineering Glycerol fermentation Escherichia coli Thin stillage Ethanol 

References

  1. Bachler C, Schneider P, Bahler P, Lustig A, Erni B (2005) Escherichia coli dihydroxyacetone kinase controls gene expression by binding to transcription factor DhaR. EMBO J 24:283–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Claude S, Heming M, Hill K (2000) Commercialisation of glycerol. In: Stelter W, Kerckow B, Hagen M (eds) Proceedings of Chemical-Technical Utilisation of Vegetable Oils Conference, 20–21 June, Bonn, pp 129–146Google Scholar
  3. Dharmadi Y, Gonzalez R (2005) A better global resolution function and a novel iterative stochastic search method for optimization of high-performance liquid chromatographic separation. J Chromatogr A 1070:89–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dharmadi Y, Murarka A, Gonzalez R (2006) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: a new platform for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:821–829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dien BS, Nichols NN, Bothast RJ (2002) Fermentation of sugar mixtures using Escherichia coli catabolite repression mutants engineered for production of L-lactic acid. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29:221–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Durnin G, Clomburg J, Yeates Z, Alvarez PJJ, Zygourakis K, Campbell P, Gonzalez R (2009) Understanding and harnessing the microaerobic metabolism of glycerol in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:148–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goerke B, Stulke J (2008) Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:613–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzalez R, Murarka A, Dharmadi Y, Yazdani SS (2008) A new model for the anaerobic fermentation of glycerol in enteric bacteria: trunk and auxiliary pathways in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 10:234–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hernandez-Montalvo V, Valle F, Bolivar F, Gosset G (2001) Characterization of sugar mixtures utilization by an Escherichia coli mutant devoid of the phosphotransferase system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57:186–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kang Y, Durfee T, Glasner JD, Qiu Y, Frisch D, Winterberg KM, Blattner FR (2004) Systematic mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli genome. J Bacteriol 186:4921–4930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Khanal SK, Rasmussen M, Shrestha P, Van Leeuwen H, Visvanathan C, Liu H (2008) Bioenergy and biofuel production from wastes/residues of emerging biofuel industries. Water Environ Res 80:1625–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller JH (1992) A short course in bacterial genetics: a laboratory manual and handbook for Escherichia coli and related bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  13. Murarka A, Dharmadi Y, Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R (2008) Fermentative utilization of glycerol in Escherichia coli and its implications for the production of fuels and chemicals. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1124–1135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Neidhardt FC, Bloch PL, Smith DF (1974) Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol 119:736–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nichols NN, Dien BS, Bothast RJ (2001) Use of catabolite repression mutants for fermentation of sugar mixtures to ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:120–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rausch KD, Belyea RL (2006) The future of co-products from corn processing. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 128:4786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanchez OJ, Cardona CA (2008) Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 99:5270–5295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sawers RG, Clark DP (2004) Chapter 3.5.3, Fermentative pyruvate and acetyl-coenzyme A metabolism. In: Curtis R III et al (eds) EcoSal—Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. ASM press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R (2007) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:213–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeng A-P, Biebl H (2002) Bulk chemicals from biotechnology: the case of 1,3-propanediol production and the new trends. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 74:239–259PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of BioengineeringRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Glycos Biotechnologies Inc.HoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations