Abstract
We propose an analytical solution of the kinetic equations describing fermentations. Equations are solved in phase space, i.e. the biomass concentration is written explicitly as a function of the substrate concentration. These results hold even when cell death and an arbitrary number of substrate/product inhibitions are accounted for. Moreover, constant yield needs not be assumed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- K i :
-
Inhibition coefficient (g/l)
- k i :
-
De-dimensionalized K i , k i = K i /S 0 (−)
- K D :
-
Cell death coefficient (g/l h)
- m :
-
Maintenance coefficient (h−1)
- n D :
-
Number of biomass death terms (–)
- n I :
-
Number of inhibitions (–)
- P i :
-
Product concentration (g/l)
- p i :
-
De-dimensionalized P i , p i = P i /(α i S 0 ) (–)
- S :
-
Substrate concentration (g/l)
- s :
-
Normalized substrate, s = 1 − S/S 0 (–)
- t :
-
time (h)
- X :
-
Viable biomass concentration (g/l)
- x :
-
Normalized biomass, x = (X − X 0)(1 + ρ)/(YS 0) (–)
- Y :
-
Biomass yield (–)
- α i :
-
Stoichiometric coefficient for product P i (–)
- κ :
-
De-dimensionalized K D , κ = mYK D /(αS 0) (–)
- μ :
-
Maximum specific growth rate (h−1)
- μ′ :
-
Change in μ due to inhibition (–)
- ρ :
-
Ratio of time constants, ρ = m Y/μ (–)
- σ i :
-
a root of \( \mu '\left( {1 - s} \right) + \rho \,k_1 \prod\nolimits_j {\left[ {1 + \left( {1 - s} \right)/k_j } \right]} \) (–)
- φ i :
-
Defined in Eq. 11 (–)
- ψ :
-
Distance to constant yield, ψ = k 1 ρ/(1 + ρ) (–)
- 0:
-
Initial value
References
Bailey JE, Ollis DF (1977) Biochemical engineering fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, New York
Bazua CD, Wilke CR (1977) Ethanol effects on the kinetics of a continuous fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 7:105–118
Caro I, Pérez L, Cantaro D (1991) Development of a kinetic model for the alcoholic fermentation of must. Biotechnol Bioeng 38:742–748
Colombié S, Malherbe S, Sablayrolles JM (2005) Modeling alcoholic fermentation in enological conditions: feasibility and interest. Am J Enol Vitic 56:238–245
Cramer AC, Vlassides S, Block DE (2001) Kinetic model for nitrogen-limited wine fermentations. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:49–60
Ghose TK, Tyagi RD (1979) Rapid ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolysate. II. product and substrate inhibition and optimization of fermenter design. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:1401–1420
Hill GA, Robinson CW (1990) A modified Ghose model for batch cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at high ethanol concentrations. Chem Eng J 44:B69–80
Hoppe GK, Hansford GS (1982) Ethanol inhibition of continuous anaerobic yeast growth. Biotechnol Lett 4:39–44
Maiorella BL, Blanch HW, Wilke CR (1983) By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:103–121
Marín R (1999) Alcoholic fermentation modelling: current state and perspectives. Am J Enol Vitic 50:166–178
Mitchell DA, von Meien OF, Krieger N, Dalsenter FDH (2004) A review of recent developments in modeling of microbial growth kinetics and intraparticle phenomena in solid-state fermentation. Biochem Eng J 17:15–26
Monod J (1941) Recherche sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes. Hermann
Ough CS, Amerine MA (1963) Use of grape concentrate to produce sweet table wines. Am J Enol Vitic 14:194–204
Thatipamala R, Rohani S, Hill GA (1992) Effects of high product and substrate inhibitions on the kinetics and biomass and product yields during ethanol batch fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 40:289–297
Topiwala HH, Sinclair CG (1971) Temperature relationship in continuous culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 13:795–813
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouville, M. Fermentation kinetics including product and substrate inhibitions plus biomass death: a mathematical analysis. Biotechnol Lett 29, 737–741 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9296-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9296-z