Abuja PM, Pilz I, Claeyssens M, Tomme P (1988)Domain structure of cellobiohydrolase II as studied by small angle X-ray scattering:close resemblance to cellobiohydrolase I. Biochem.Biophys.Res.Comm.
156:180–185.
Google Scholar
Appel RD, Bairoch A, Hochstrasser DF (1994)A new-generation of information-retrieval tools for biologists–the example of the expasy www server. Trends Biochem.Sci.
19:258–260.
Google Scholar
Banka RR, Mishra S (2002)Adsorption properties of the bril forming protein from Trichoderma reesei.Enzyme Microb.Technol.
31:784–793.
Google Scholar
Banka RR, Mishra S, Ghose TK (1998)Fibril formation from cellulose by a novel protein from Trichoderma reesei:a non-hydrolytic cellulolytic component?World J.Microb.Biot.
14:551–558.
Google Scholar
Boraston AB, McLean BW, Kormos JM, Alam M, Gilkes NR, Haynes CA, Tomme P, Kilburn DG, Warren RAJ (1999) Carbohydrate-binding modules:diversity of structure and function.In:Gilbert HJ,Davies GJ,Henrissat B,Svensson B,eds.Recent Advances in Carbohydrate Bioengineering. Cambridge:The Royal Society of Chemistry,pp. 202–211.
Bourquin V, Nishikubo N, Abe H, Brumer H, Denman S, Eklund M, Christiernin M, Teeri TT, Sundberg B, Mellerowicz EJ (2002)Xyloglucan endotransglycosylases have a function during the formation of secondary cell walls of vascular tissues.Plant Cell.14:3073–8308.
Google Scholar
Bray MR, Johnson PE, Gilkes NR, McIntosh LP, Kilburn DG, Warren RAJ (1996)Probing the role of tryptophan residues in a cellulose-binding domain by chemical modification. Protein Sci.
5:2311–2318.
Google Scholar
Brun E, Moriaud F, Gans P, Blackledge MJ,Barras F, Marion D (1997)Solution structure of the cellulose-binding domain of the endoglucanase z secreted by Erwinia chrysanthemi. Biochemistry.36:16074–16086.
Google Scholar
Carrard G, Linder M (1999)Widely different off rates of two closely related cellulose-binding domains from Trichoderma reesei.Eur.J.Biochem.262:637–643.
Google Scholar
Carrard G, Koivula A, Soderlund H, Beguin P (2000)Cellu-lose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA
97: 10342–10347.
Google Scholar
Chapon V, Czjzek M, El Hassouni M, Py B, Juy M, Barras F (2001)Type II protein secretion in Gram-negative patho-genic bacteria:the study of structure/secretion relationships of the cellulase Cel5 (formerly EGz)from Erwinia chrysanthemi. J.Mol.Biol.310:1055–1066.
Google Scholar
Chapon V, Simpson HD, Morelli X, Brun E, Barras F (2000) Alteration of a single tryptophan residue of the cellulose-binding domain blocks secretion of the Erwinia chrysanthemi Cel5 cellulase (Ex-EGz)via the type II system.J.Mol.Biol.
303:117–123.
Google Scholar
Creagh AL, Ong E, Jervis E, Kilburn DG, Haynes CA (1996) Binding of the cellulose-binding domain of exoglucanase Cex from Cellulomonas mi to insoluble microcrystalline cellulose is entropically driven.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA.93: 12229–12234.
Google Scholar
Daniel G (1994)Use of electron microscopy for aiding our understanding of wood biodegradation.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.13:199–233.
Google Scholar
Davies GJ, Brzozowski AM, Dauter M, Varrot A, Schu ¨lein M (2000)Structure and function of Humicola insolens family 6 cellulases:structure of the endoglucanase,Cel6B,at 1.6 A ¢ª resolution.Biochem.J.348:201–207.
Google Scholar
Davies GJ, Dauter M, Brzozowski AM, Eskelund Bjørnvad M, Andersen KV, Schu ¨lein M (1998)Structure of the Bacillus agaradherans family 5 endoglucanase at 1.6 A ¢ªand its cellobiose complex at 2.0 A ¢ªresolution.Biochemistry
37: 1926–1932.
Google Scholar
Davies G, Henrissat B (1995)Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases.Structure
3:853–859.
Google Scholar
Din N, Gilkes NR, Tekant B, Miller J, Robert C, Warren RAJ, Kilburn DG (1991)Non-hydrolytic disruption of cellulose bres by the binding domain of a bacterial cellulase.Bio-Technology
9:1096–1099.
Google Scholar
Divne C, Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Pettersson G, Knowles JCK, Teeri TT, Jones TA (1994)The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei.Science
265: 524–528.
Google Scholar
Doi RH, Kosugi A, Murashima K, Tamaru Y, Han SO (2003) Cellulosomes from mesophilic bacteria.J.Bacteriol.185: 5907–5914.
Google Scholar
Esteghlalian AR, Srivastava V, Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG,x Warren RAJ, Saddler JN (2001)Do cellulose binding domains increase substrate accessibility?Appl.Biochem. Biotechnol.91–3:575–592.
Google Scholar
Fornstedt T, Go ¨tmar G, Andersson M, Guiochon G (1999) Dependence on the mobile-phase pH of the adsorption behaviour of propranolol enantiomers on a cellulase protein used as the chiral selector.J.Am.Chem.Soc.121:1164–1174.
Google Scholar
Gielkens MMC, Dekkers E, Visser J, de Graa LH (1999)Two cellobiohydrolase-encoding genes from Aspergillus niger require D D-xylose and the xylanolytic transcriptional activator xlnr for their expression.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.65:4340–4345.
Google Scholar
Gilad R, Rabinovich L, Yaron S, Bayer EA, Lamed R, Gilbert HJ, Shoham Y (2003)Ce1I,a noncellulosomal family 9 enzyme from Clostridium thermocellum,is a processive endoglucanase that degrades crystalline cellulose.teriol.185:391–398.
Google Scholar
Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG, Miller J, Robert C, Warren RAJ, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Henrissat B (1993)Visualization of the adsorption of a bacterial endo-b 1,4-glucanase and its isolated cellulose-binding domain to crystalline cellulose.Int. J.Biol.Macromol.15:347–351.
Google Scholar
Guimaraes BG, Souchon H, Lytle BL, Wu DJH, Alzari PM (2002)The crystal structure and catalytic mechanism of cellobiohydrolase CelS,the major enzymatic component of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome.J.Mol.Biol.320: 587–596.
Google Scholar
Go ¨tmar G, Fornstedt T, Guiochon G (2000)Retention mechanism of b blockers on an immobilized cellulase. Relative importance of the hydrophobic and ionic contribu-tions to their enantioselective and nonselective interactions. Anal.Chem.72:3908–3915.
Google Scholar
Hakamada Y, Endo K, Takizawa S, Kobayashi T, Shirai T, Yamane T, Ito S (2002)Enzymatic properties,crystalliza-tion,and deduced amino acid sequence of an alkaline endoglucanase from Bacillus circulans.Biochim.Biophys. Acta
1570:174–180.
Google Scholar
Ha ¨llberg M (2002)Structural studies on the extracellular. avocytochrome cellobiose dehydrogenase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium.PhD-thesis.Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (http://publications.uu.se/uu/fulltext/nbn_se_uu_di-va-2701.pdf).
Google Scholar
Harhangi HR, Freelove ACJ, Ubhayasekera W, van Dinther M,Steenbakkers PJM,Akhmanova A,van der Drift C,Jetten MSM,Mowbray SL,Gilbert HJ,den Camp H (2003)Cel6A,a major exoglucanase from the cellulosome of the anaerobic fungi Piromyces sp E2 and Piromyces equi.Biochim.Biophys.Acta-Gene Struct.Expression
1628:30–39.
Google Scholar
Henriksson H, Munoz IG, Isaksson R, Pettersson G, Johansson G (2000)Cellobiohydrolase 58 (P.c.Cel 7D)is comple-mentary to the homologous cbh I (T.r.Cel 7A)in enantioseparations.J.Chromatogr.A.898:63–74.
Google Scholar
Henriksson G, Nutt A, Henriksson H, Pettersson B, Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G (1999)Endogluca-nase 28 (Cel12A),a new Phanerochaete chrysosporium cellulase.Eur.J.Biochem.259:88–95.
Google Scholar
Henriksson G, Salumets A, Divne C, Pettersson G (1997a) Studies of cellulose binding by cellobiose dehydrogenase and a comparison with cellobiohydrolase 1.Biochem.J.324: 833–838.
Google Scholar
Henriksson H, Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Koivula A, Pettersson G, Divne C, Valtcheva L, Isaksson R (1997b)The catalytic amino-acid residues in the active site of cellobiohydrolase I are involved in chiral recognition.J.Biotechnol.57:115–125.
Google Scholar
Henrissat B, Claeyssens M, Tomme P, Lemesle L, Mornon J-P (1989)Cellulase families reveald by hydrophobic cluster analysis.Gene
81:83–95.
Google Scholar
Hildeń L, Daniel G, Johansson G (2002) Use of a fluorescence labelled,carbohydrate-binding module from Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel7D for studying wood cell wall ultrastructure.Biotechnol.Lett.25:553–558
Google Scholar
Irwin D, Shin D-H, Zhang S, Barr BK, Sakon J, Karplus PA, Wilson DB (1998)Roles of the catalytic domain and two cellulose binding domains of Thermomonospora fusca E4 in cellulose hydrolysis.J.Bacteriol.180:1709–1714.
Google Scholar
Jeoh T, Wilson DB, Walker LP (2002)Cooperative and competitive binding in synergistic mixtures of Thermobi da fusca cellulases Cel5A,Cel6B and Cel9A.Biotechnol.Prog.
18:760–769.
Google Scholar
Jervis EJ, Haynes CA, Kilburn DG (1997)Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose.J.Biol.Chem.272:24016–24023.
Google Scholar
Johansson G, Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Lindeberg G, Engstro ¨mA ¢ª,Pettersson G (1989)Isolated fungal cellulase terminal domains and a synthetic minimum analogue bind to cellulose.FEBS Lett.
243:389–393.
Google Scholar
Jung H, Wilson DB, Walker LP (2003)Binding and reversibility of Thermobi da fusca Cel5A,Cel6B and Cel48A and their respective catalytic domains to bacterial microcrystalline cellulose.Biotech.Bioeng.84:151–159.
Google Scholar
Juy M, Amit AG, Alzari PM, Poljak RJ, Claeyssens M, Be ´guin P, Aubert J-P (1992)Three-dimensional structure of a thermostable bacterial cellulase.Nature
357:89–91.
Google Scholar
Karlsson J, Medve J, Tjerneld F (1999)Hydrolysis of steam-pretreated lignocellulose–synergism and adsorption for cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II of Trichoderma reesei.Appl.Biochem.Biotechnol.82:243–258.
Google Scholar
Khademi S, Zhang D, Swanson SM, Wartenberg A, Witte K, Meyer EF (2002)Determination of the structure of an endoglucanase from Aspergillus niger and its mode of inhibition by palladium chloride.Acta Cryst.D
D58:660–667.
Google Scholar
Kim C-H, Kim D-S (1995)Puri cation and speci city of a speci c endo-b 1,4-D D-glucanase (avicelase II)resembling exo-cellobiohydrolase from Bacillus circulans.Enzyme Microb. Technol.17:248–254.
Google Scholar
Kleywegt GJ, Zou J-Y, Divne C, Davies GJ, Sinning I, Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Reinikainen T, Srisodsuk M, Teeri TT, Jones TA (1997)The crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of endoglucanase I from Trichoderma reesei at 3.6 A ¢ª resolution,and a comparison with related enzymes.J.Mol. Biol.272:383–397.
Google Scholar
Lee I, Evans BR, Woodward J (2000)The mechanism of cellulase action on cotton bres:evidence from atomic force microscopy.Ultramicroscopy
82:213–221.
Google Scholar
Leggio LL, Larsen S (2002)The 162 A ¢ªstructure of Thermoas-cus aurantiacus endoglucanase:completing the structural picture of sub-families in glycoside hydrolase family 5.FEBS Lett
523:103–108.
Google Scholar
Lehtiö J (2001)Functional studies and engineering of family 1 carbohydrate-binding modules.PhD-thesis.Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology(http://www.lib.kth.se/Sammanfattningar/lehtio010914.pdf).
Google Scholar
Lehtiö J, Sugiyama J, Gustavsson M, Fransson L, Linder M, Teeri TT (2003)The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA
100:484–489.
Google Scholar
Lehtiö J, Werne ´rus H, Samuelson P, Teeri TT, Sta ¢ªhl S (2001) Directed immobilization of recombinant staphylococci on cotton bres by functional display of a fungal cellulose-binding domain.FEMS Microbiol.Lett.195:197–204.
Google Scholar
Leibovitz E, Be ´guin P (1996)A new type of cohesin domain that speci cally binds the dockerin domain of the Clostri-dium thermocellum cellulosome-integrating protein CipA. J.Bacteriol.178:3077–3084.
Google Scholar
Levy I, Shoseyov O (2002)Cellulose-binding domains biotechnological applications.Biotechnol.Adv.
20:191–213.
Google Scholar
Levy I, Paldi T, Shoseyov O (2004)Engineering a bifunctional starch-cellulose cross-bridge protein.Biomaterials.25:1841–1849.
Google Scholar
Linder M, Lindeberg G, Reinikainen T, Teeri TT, Pettersson G (1995a)The difference in a community between two fungal cellulose-binding domains is dominated by a single amino acid substitution.FEBS Lett.372:96–98.
Google Scholar
Linder M, Mattinen M-L, Kontteli M, Lindeberg G, Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Drakenberg T, Reinikainen T, Pettersson G, Annila A (1995b)Identi cation of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I.Protein Sci.4:1056–1064.
Google Scholar
Linder M, Salovuori I, Ruohonen L, Teeri TT (1996)Charac-terization of a double cellulose-binding domain.J.Biol. Chem.271:21268–21272.
Google Scholar
Lytle BL, Volkman BF, Westler WM, Heckman MP, Wu JHD (2001)Solution structure of a type I dockerin domain,a novel prokaryotic,extracellular calcium-binding domain. J.Mol.Biol.307:745–753.
Google Scholar
Madkour M, Mayer F (2003)Structural organization of the intact bacterial cellulosome as revealed by electron micros-copy.Cell.Biol.Int.27:831–836.
Google Scholar
Mandelman D, Belaich A, Belaich JP, Aghajari N, Driguez H, Haser R (2003)X-ray crystal structure of the multidomain endoglucanase Cel9G from Clostridium cellulolyticum com-plexed with natural and synthetic cello-oligosaccharides. J.Bacteriol.185:4127–4135.
Google Scholar
Martinez D, Larrondo LF, Putnam N, Gelpke MDS, Huang K, Chapman J, Helfenbein KG, Ramaiya P, Detter JC, Larimer F, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Berka R, Cullen D, Rokhsar D (2004)Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain rp78. Nature Biotechnol.22:695–700.
Google Scholar
Mellerowicz EJ, Baucher M, Sundberg B, Boerjan W (2001) Unravelling cell wall formation in the woody dicot stem.Plant Mol.Biol.47:239–274.
Google Scholar
Munoz IG, Ubhayasekera W, Henriksson H, Szabo I, Pettersson G, Johansson G, Mowbray SL, Stahlberg J (2001) Family 7 cellobiohydrolases from Phanerochaete chrysospo-rium:crystal structure of the catalytic module of Cel7D (CBH58)1. 32 Angstrom resolution and homology models of the isozymes.J.Mol.Biol.314:1097–1111.
Google Scholar
Munoz IG, Mowbray SL, Sta ¢ªhlberg J (2003)The catalytic module of Cel7D from Phanerochaete chrysosporium as a chiral selector:structural studies of its complex with the beta blocker (R )-propranolol.Acta Cryst.D
D59:637–643.
Google Scholar
Murashima K, Kosugi A, Doi RH (2003)Synergistic effects of cellulosomal xylanase and cellulases from Clostridium cellulovorans on plant cell wall degradation.J.Bacteriol.185: 1518–1524.
Google Scholar
O ¨hman D, Norlander B, Peterson C, Bengtsson F (2002) Simultaneous determination of reboxetine and o-desethylre-boxetine enantiomers using enantioselective reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.J.Chromatogr.A
947:247–254.
Google Scholar
O 'sullivan AC (1997)Cellulose:the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose
4:173–207.
Google Scholar
Pagès S, Be ´laïch A, Be ´laïch J-P, Morag E, Lamed R, Shoham Y, Bayer EA (1997)Species-speci city of the cohesindockerin interaction between Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium cellulolyticum:prediction of speci city determinants of the dockerin domain.Proteins
29:517–527.
Google Scholar
Park YW, Tominaga R, Sugiyama J, Furuta Y, Tanimoto E, Samejima M, Sakai F, Hayashi T (2003)Enhancement of growth by expression of poplar cellulase in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.33:1099–1106.
Google Scholar
Parsiegla G, Belaý ¨ch A, Belaý ¨ch JP, Haser R (2002)Crystal structure of the cellulase Cel9M enlightens structure/function relationships of the variable catalytic modules in glycoside hydrolases.Biochemistry
41:11134–11142.
Google Scholar
Pei-Ji G, Guan-Jun C, Tian-Hong W, Ying-Shu Z, Jie L (2001) Non-hydrolytic disruption of crystalline structure of cellu-lose by cellulose binding domain and linker sequence of cellobiohydrolase I from Penicillium janthinellum.Acta Biochim.Biophys.Sin.33:13–18.
Google Scholar
Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Nevanen T, Laaksonen L, Kraulis P, Jones TA, Knowles JKC, Teeri TT (1992) Investigation of the function of mutated cellulose-binding domains of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I.Proteins
14:475–482.
Google Scholar
Riedel K, Bronnenmeier K (1998)Intramolecular synergism in an engineered exo-endo-1,4-b glucanase fusion protein.Mol. Microbiol.28:767–775.
Google Scholar
Robson LM, Chambliss GH (1989)Cellulases of bacterial origin.Enzyme Microb.Technol.11:626–644.
Google Scholar
Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, Knowles JCK, Jones TA (1990)Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei.Science
249:380–386.
Google Scholar
Sakon J, Irwin D, Wilson DB, Karplus PA (1997)Structure and mechanism of endo/exocellulase E4 from Thermomonospora fusca.Nature Struct.Biol.4:810–818.
Google Scholar
Samejima M, Sugiyama J, Igarashi K, Eriksson K-EL (1998) Enzymatic hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose.Carbohydr.Res.
305:281–288.
Google Scholar
Sandgren M, Shaw A, Ropp TH, Wu S, Bott R, Cameron AD, Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Mitchinson C, Jones TA (2001)The X-ray crystal structure of the Trichoderma reesei family 12 endo-glucanase 3,Cel12A,at 1.9 A ¢ªresolution.J.Mol.Biol.308: 295–310.
Google Scholar
Schwarz WH (2001)The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria.Appl.Microbiol.Biotechnol.56:634–649.
Google Scholar
Shepherd MG, Tong CC, Cole AL (1981)Substrate speci city and mode of action of the cellulases from the thermophilic fungus Thermoascus aurantiacus.Biochem.J.193:67–74.
Google Scholar
Shoham Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA (1999)The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccherides.Trends Microbiol.7:275–281.
Google Scholar
Spinelli S, Fie ´robe H-P, Belaïch A, Belaïch J-P, Henrissat B, Cambillau C (2000)Crystal structure of a cohesin module from Clostridium cellulolyticum:implications for dockerin recognition.J.Mol.Biol.304:189–200.
Google Scholar
Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Henriksson H, Divne C, Isaksson R, Pettersson G, Johansson G, Jones TA (2001)Structural basis for enantio-mer binding and separation of a common b blocker:crystal structure of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A with bound (S)-pro-pranolol at 1.9 A ¢ªresolution.J.Mol.Biol.305:79–93.
Google Scholar
Sta ¢ªhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G (1991)A new model for enzymatic-hydrolysis of cellulose based on the 2-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase-I.Bio-Technol.9:286–290.
Google Scholar
Sulzenbacher G, Shareck F, Morosoli R, Dupont C, Davies GJ (1997)The Streptomyces lividans family 12 endoglucanase: construction of the catalytic core,expression,and X-ray structure at 1.75 A ¢ªresolution.Biochemistry
36:16032–16039.
Google Scholar
Taylor JG, Haigler CH, Kilburn DG, Blanton RL (1996) Detection of cellulose with improved speci city using laser-based instruments.Biotechnol.Histochem.71:215–223.
Google Scholar
Tomme P, Boraston A, McLean B, Kormos J, Creagh AL, Sturch K, Gilkes NR, Haynes CA, Warren RAJ, Kilburn DG (1998) Characterization and affinity applications of cellulose-binding domains.J.Chromatogr. B
715:283–296.
Google Scholar
Tomme P, Driver DP, Amandoron EA, Miller J, Robert C, Warren RAJ, Kilburn DG (1995)Comparison of a fungal (family I)and bacterial (family II)cellulose-binding domain.J.Bacteriol.177:4356–4363.
Google Scholar
Tormo J, Lamed R, Chirino AJ, Morag E, Bayer EA, Shoham Y, Steitz TA (1996)Crystal structure of a bacterial family-III cellulose-binding domain:a general mechanism for attachment to cellulose.EMBO J.15:5739–5751.
Google Scholar
Van Petegem F, Vandenberghe I, Bhat MK, Van Beeumen J (2002)Atomic resolution structure of the major endoglu-canase from Thermoascus aurantiacus.Biochem.Biophys. Res.Commun.296:161–166.
Google Scholar
van Solingen P, Meijer D, van der Kleij WAH, Barnett C, Bolle R, Power SD, Jones BE (2001)Cloning and expression of an endocellulase gene from a novel streptomycete isolated from an East African soda lake.Extremophiles
5:333–341.
Google Scholar
Varrot A, Davies G (2003)Direct experimental observation of the hydrogen-bonding network of a glycosidase along its reaction coordinate revealed by atomic resolution analyses of endoglucanase Cel5A.Acta Cryst.D
D59:447–452.
Google Scholar
Varrot A, Hastrup S, Schu¨lein M, Davies GJ (1999)Crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of the family 6 cellobiohydrolase II,Cel6A,from Humicola insolens,at 1.92 A ¢ªresolution.Biochem.J.337:297–304.
Google Scholar
Va¨ljama¨e P, Kipper K, Pettersson G, Johansson G (2003) Synergistic cellulose hydrolysis can be described in terms of fractal-like kinetics.Biotechnol.Bioeng.84:254–257.
Google Scholar
Väljamäe P, Pettersson G, Johansson G (2001)Mechanism of substrate inhibition in cellulose synergistic degradation.Eur. J.Biochem.268:4520–4526.
Google Scholar
Väljamäe P, Sild V, Nutt A, Pettersson G, Johansson G (1999) Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergisitic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I.Eur.J.Biochem.266:327–334.
Google Scholar
Webb EC (1992)Enzyme Nomenclature 1992,Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzymes.San Diego: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Woodward J (1991)Synergism in cellulase systems.Biores. Technol.36:67–75.
Google Scholar
Xiao ZZ, Gao PJ, Qu YB, Wang TH (2001)Cellulose-binding domain of endoglucanase III from Trichoderma reesei disrupting the structure of cellulose.Biotechnol.Lett.23: 711–715.
Google Scholar
Yang J-l, Pettersson B, Eriksson K-E (1988)Development of bioassays for the characterization of pulp ber surfaces,I. Characterization of various mechanical pulp ber surfaces by specific cellulolytic enzymes.Nord.Pulp Paper Res.J.42: 19–25.
Google Scholar
Yuan S, Wu Y, Cosgrove DJ (2001)A fungal endoglucanase with plant cell wall extension activity.Plant Physiol.127: 324–333.
Google Scholar
Zverlov V, Mahr S, Riedel K, Bronnenmeier K (1998) Properties and gene structure of a bifunctional cellulolytic enzyme (CelA)from the extreme thermophile 'Anaerocellum thermophilum' with separate glycosyl hydrolase family 9 and 48 catalytic domains.Microbiology
144:457–465.
Google Scholar