Advertisement

Biochemical Genetics

, Volume 50, Issue 11–12, pp 823–837 | Cite as

A Combination of Structural and Cis-Regulatory Factors Drives Biochemical Differences in Drosophila melanogaster Malic Enzyme

  • Teresa Z. Rzezniczak
  • Thomas E. Lum
  • Robert Harniman
  • Thomas J. S. Merritt
Article

Abstract

The evolutionary significance of molecular variation is still contentious, with much current interest focusing on the relative contribution of structural changes in proteins versus regulatory variation in gene expression. We present a population genetic and biochemical study of molecular variation at the malic enzyme locus (Men) in Drosophila melanogaster. Two amino acid polymorphisms appear to affect substrate-binding kinetics, while only one appears to affect thermal stability. Interestingly, we find that enzyme activity differences previously assigned to one of the polymorphisms may, instead, be a function of linked regulatory differences. These results suggest that both regulatory and structural changes contribute to differences in protein function. Our examination of the Men coding sequences reveals no evidence for selection acting on the polymorphisms, but earlier work on this enzyme indicates that the biochemical variation observed has physiological repercussions and therefore could potentially be under natural selection.

Keywords

Malic enzyme (MenMolecular evolution Genetic variation Enzyme function 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant (3414-07) and Canada Research Chair (950-215763) to TJSM. TZR was supported by a NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Award and a Laurentian University Research Fund award.

References

  1. Chakrabartty A, Schellman JA, Baldwin RL (1991) Large differences in the helix propensities of alanine and glycine. Nature 351:586–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eanes WF (1999) Analysis of selection on enzyme polymorphisms. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 30:301–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fu YX, Li WH (1993) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133:693–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ganter C, Plückthun A (1990) Glycine to alanine substitutions in helices of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: effects on stability. Biochemistry 29:9395–9402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geer BW, Krochko D, Williamson JH (1979a) Ontogeny, cell distribution, and the physiological role of NADP-malic enzyme in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Genet 17:867–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geer BW, Lindel DL, Lindel DM (1979b) Relationship of the oxidative pentose shunt pathway to lipid synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Genet 17:881–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall JG (1985) Temperature-related kinetic differentiation of glucosephosphate isomerase alleloenzymes isolated from the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Biochem Genet 23:705–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hochachka PW, Somero GN (2002) Biochemical adaptation: mechanism and process in physiological evolution, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoekstra HE, Coyne JA (2007) The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61:995–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laurie-Ahlberg CC, Wilton AN, Curtsinger JW, Emigh TH (1982) Naturally occurring enzyme activity variation in Drosophila melanogaster, I: sources of variation for 23 enzymes. Genetics 102:191–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Leatherbarrow R (1998) GraFit version 4. Erithacus Software Ltd, StainesGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewontin RC (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Lipscomb LA, Gassner NC, Snow SD, Eldridge AM, Baase WA, Drew CL, Matthews BW (1998) Context-dependent protein stabilization by methionine-to-leucine substitution shown in T4 lysozyme. Protein Sci 7:765–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the \(2^{-\Updelta\Updelta {\text C_{\text T}}}\) method. Methods 25:402–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lum TE, Merritt TJS (2011) Non-classical regulation of transcription: interchromosomal-interactions at the malic enzyme locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 189:837–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Merritt TJS, Duvernell D, Eanes WF (2005) Natural and synthetic alleles provide complementary insights into the nature of selection acting on the Men polymorphism of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 171:1707–1718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merritt TJS, Sezgin E, Zhu C-T, Eanes WF (2006) Triglyceride pools, flight and activity variation at the Gpdh locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172:293–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merritt TJS, Kuczynski C, Sezgin E, Zhu C-T, Kumagai S, Eanes WF (2009) Quantifying interactions within the NADP(H) enzyme network in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 182:565–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moriyama EN, Powell JR (1996) Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 13:261–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pollak N, Dölle C, Ziegler M (2007) The power to reduce: pyridine nucleotides, small molecules with a multitude of functions. Biochem J 402:205–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:2496–2497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schilder R, Zera AJ, Black C, Hoidal M, Wehrkamp C (2011) The biochemical basis of life history adaptation: molecular and enzymological causes of NADP+–isocitrate dehydrogenase activity differences between morphs of Gryllus firmus that differ in lipid biosynthesis and life history. Mol Biol Evol 28:3381–3393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sezgin E, Duvernell DD, Matzkin LM, Duan Y, Zhu C-T, Verrelli BC, Eanes WF (2004) Single-locus latitudinal clines and their relationship to temperate adaptation in metabolic genes and derived alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 168:923–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wise EM, Ball EG (1964) Malic enzyme and lipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 52:1255–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wray GA (2007) The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8:206–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang Z, Floyd DL, Loeber G, Tong L (2000) Structure of a closed form of human malic enzyme and implications for catalytic mechanism. Nat Struct Biol 7:251–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang Z, Zhang H, Hung H-C, Kuo C–C, Tsai L-C, Yuan HS, Chou W-Y, Chang G–G, Tong L (2002) Structural studies of the pigeon cytosolic NADP(+)-dependent malic enzyme. Protein Sci 11:332–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ying W (2008) NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH in cellular functions and cell death: regulation and biological consequences. Antioxid Redox Signal 10:179–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Z. Rzezniczak
    • 1
  • Thomas E. Lum
    • 1
  • Robert Harniman
    • 1
  • Thomas J. S. Merritt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada

Personalised recommendations