Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of FORS-D Analysis: A Comparison with the Statistically Significant Stem-loop Potential

  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stem-loop potential of a nucleic acid segment (expressed as a FONS value), decomposes into base composition-dependent and base order-dependent components. The latter, expressed as a FORS-D value, is derived by subtracting the value of the base composition-dependent component (FORS-M) from the FONS value. FORS-D analysis is the use of FORS-D values to estimate the potential of local base order to contribute to a stem-loop structure, and it has been used to investigate the relationship between stem-loop structure and other selective pressures on genomes. In the present study, we evaluated the reliability of FORS-D analysis by comparing it with statistically significant stem-loop potential, another robust method developed by Le and Maizel for examining stem-loop structure. We found that FORS-M values calculated using 10 randomized sequences are as reliable as those calculated using 100 randomized sequences. The resulting FORS-D values have a similar trend and distribution as statistically significant stem-loop potential, implying that FORS-D analysis is as reliable as the latter in measuring the distribution of base order-dependent stem-loop potential. Since the calculation of the FORS-M values is time consuming, the integrated program Bodslp developed by us will become a convenient tool for large-scale FORS-D analysis. The results also suggest that for some purposes the online program SigStb developed by Le and Maizel may be used as an alternative tool for FORS-D analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrette IH, McKenna S, Taylor DR, Forsdyke DR (2001) Introns resolve the conflict between base order-dependent stem-loop potential and the encoding of RNA or protein: further evidence from overlapping genes. Gene 270:181–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson EC, Anderson JN (1994) Nucleotide composition as a driving force in the evolution of retroviruses. J Mol Evol 38:506–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JH, Le SY, Shapiro B, Currey KM, Maizel JV (1990) A computational procedure for assessing the significance of RNA secondary structure. Comput Appl Biosci 6:7–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clote P, Ferre F, Kranakis E, Krizanc D (2005) Structural RNA has lower folding energy than random RNA of the same dinucleotide frequency. RNA 11:578–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995a) A stem-loop “kissing” model for the initiation of recombination and the origin of introns. Mol Biol Evol 12:949–958

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995b) Reciprocal relationship between stem-loop potential and substitution density in retroviral quasispecies under positive Darwinian selection. J Mol Evol 41:1022–1037

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995c) Conservation of stem-loop potential in introns of snake venom phospholipase A2 genes. An application of FORS-D analysis. Mol Biol Evol 12:1157–1165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1996) Stem-loop potential in MHC genes: a new way of evaluating positive Darwinian selection? Immunogenetics 43:182–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1998) An alternative way of thinking about stem-loops in DNA. A case study of the human G0S2 gene. J Theor Biol 192:489–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2002) Selective pressures that decrease synonymous mutations in Plasmodium falciparum. Trends Parasitol 18:411–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2007) Positive Darwinian selection. Does the comparative method rule? J Biol Syst 15:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le SY, Maizel JV (1989) A method for assessing the statistical significance of RNA folding. J Theor Biol 138:495–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le SY, Chen JH, Currey KM, Maizel JV (1988a) A program for predicting significant RNA secondary structures. Comput Appl Biosci 4:153–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le SY, Chen JH, Braun MJ, Gonda MA, Maizel JV (1988b) Stability of RNA stem-loop structure and distribution of non random structure in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-I). Nucleic Acids Res 16:5153–5168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le SY, Chen JH, Chatterjee D, Maizel JV (1989) Sequence divergence and open regions of RNA secondary structures in the envelope regions of the 17 human immunodeficiency virus isolates. Nucleic Acids Res 17:3275–3288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le SY, Liu WM, Chen JH, Maizel JV (2001) Local thermodynamic stability scores are well represented by a noncentral student’s t distribution. J Theor Biol 210:411–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH (1999) Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol 288:911–940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews DH, Disney MD, Childs JL, Schroeder SJ, Zuker M, Turner DH (2004) Incorporating chemical modification constraints into a dynamic programming algorithm for prediction of RNA secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7287–7292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seffens W, Digby D (1999) mRNAs have greater negative folding free energies than shuffled or codon choice randomized sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 27:1578–1584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uzilov AV, Keegan JM, Mathews DH (2006) Detection of noncoding RNAs on the basis of predicted secondary structure formation free energy change. BMC Bioinformatics 7:173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Washietl S, Hofacker IL, Stadler PF (2005) Fast and reliable prediction of noncoding RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2454–2459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xue HY, Forsdyke DR (2003) Low-complexity segments in Plasmodium falciparum proteins are primarily nucleic acid level adaptations. Mol Biochem Parasitol 128:21–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CY, Wei JF, He SH (2005a) Local base order influences the origin of ccr5 deletions mediated by DNA slip replication. Biochem Genet 43:229–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CY, Wei JF, He SH (2005b) The key role for local base order in the generation of multiple forms of China HIV-1 B′/C intersubtype recombinants. BMC Evol Biol 5:53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Zhang CT (2005) Identification of replication origins in archaeal genomes based on the Z-curve method. Archaea 1:335–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30600352), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (No. BK2006550), the Startup Fund from Jiangsu University for Advanced Scholars (No. 2281270002), the Startup Fund of First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University for Advanced Scholars, and the Startup Fund for Zhenjiang Key Institute of Clinical Laboratory Science (No. SH2006066).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao-Heng He.

Additional information

C. Y. Zhang and J. F. Wei contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, CY., Wei, JF., Wu, JS. et al. Evaluation of FORS-D Analysis: A Comparison with the Statistically Significant Stem-loop Potential. Biochem Genet 46, 29–40 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-007-9126-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-007-9126-6

Keywords

Navigation