Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 257–262 | Cite as

Assessment of Visual Acuity after Implantation of Gradient Multifocal Lenses

  • T. A. MorozovaEmail author
  • G. I. Rozhkova

The aims of the present work were to analyze existing methods of testing visual acuity and to undertake a comparative study of visual acuity at different distances after implantation of multifocal gradient intraocular lenses using modified ETDRS tables with Russian letters and the decimal system. The study data did not identify any statistically significant differences between measures of visual acuity obtained using the logarithmic and decimal systems. Use of ETDRS tables with Russian letters allows the procedure to be standardized for multinational clinical trials and exchange of databases.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Morozova, T. A., Pokrovskii, D. F., Medvedev, I. B., and Kerimov, T. Z., “Current aspects of multifocal intraocular correction,” Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk, 72, No. 4, 268-275 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morozova, T. A. and Kerimov, T. Z., “Current approaches to the analysis of dysphotopsia, assessment of subjective satisfaction, and independence from spectacles on the background of multifocal intraocular correction. A review,” Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk, 72, No. 4, 355-364 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malyugin, B. E., Takhtaev, Yu. V., Morozova, T. A., and Pozdeeva, N. A., “Results of a multicenter trial of the implantation of third-generation multifocal gradient IOL (Gradiol-3),” Oftal’mokhirurgiya, No. 2, 36-40 (2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malyugin, B. E., Morozova, T. A., and Fomina, O. V., “Studies of visual acuity in patients after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses,” Sovrem. Tekhnol. Oftal’mol., 8, No. 4, 163 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morozova, T. A., Intraocular Correction of Aphakia with Multifocal Lenses with Gradient Optics. A Clinical-Theoretical Study: Dissertation for Master’s Degree in Medical Sciences, Moscow (2006).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vries, N. E. and Nuijts, R. M., “Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Literature review of benefits and side effects,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 39, No. 2, 268-278 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walker, H. K., Hall, W. D., and Hurst, J. W., Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations, Butterworths, Boston (1990), 3rd edition.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colenbrander, A., “The historical evolution of visual acuity measurement,” Visual Impairment Research, 10, No. 2-3, 57-66 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snellen, H., Test-Types for the Determination of the Acuteness of Vision, P. W. van de Weijer, Utrecht (1862).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results. Basic Methods for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 8597:1994 Ophthalmic Optics. Visual Acuity Testing. Standard Optotype and its Presentation.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 8596:2009 Ophthalmic Optics. Visual Acuity Testing. Standard Optotype and its Presentation.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferris, F. L., 3rd, Kassoff A., Bresnick, G. H., and Bailey, I., “New visual acuity charts for clinical research,” Am. J. Ophthalmol., 94, 91-96 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferris, F. L., 3rd and Bailey, I., “Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum,” Ophthalmology, 103, 181-182 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plainis, S., Tzatzala, P., Orphanos, Y., and Tsilimbaris, M. K., “A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use,” Optometry and Vision Science, 84, No. 7, 647-653 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rozhkova, G. I., Gracheva, M. A., and Lebedev, D. S., “Optimization of test signs and tables for measurement of visual acuity,” in: Proceedings of the Scientific Conference of Ophthalmologists “Neva Horizons 2014” [in Russian], St. Petersburg (2014), pp. 563-567.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Medical-Biological ProblemsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute for Information Transmission Problems named after A. A. KharkevichRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations