Abstract
The zoophytophagous predator, Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae), is an important biological control agent. To maintain this insect, several non-crop host plants are used as banker plants in greenhouse crop systems. To optimize the efficiency of the predator-banker plant interaction, it is necessary to investigate how individual predators move between banker plants and crops. However, the movement is difficult to quantify under field conditions. Therefore, we investigated the movement of N. tenuis between tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L., Solanales: Solanaceae) and three banker plants (Cleome hassleriana Chod., Brassicales: Cleomaceae; Sesamum indicum L., Lamiales: Pedaliaceae; and Verbena × hybrida Voss, Lamiales: Verbenaceae) in a greenhouse by conducting PCR using plant-species-specific primers. Laboratory analysis results showed that our molecular method could detect N. tenuis activity within a relatively short time (≤ 24 h). In addition, N. tenuis predation on a pest species was unlikely to result in false detection of plant DNA in the pest (suggesting that N. tenuis had been on the plants). Multiple plant species were detected in adult insects collected from the greenhouse plants, indicating that N. tenuis frequently moved across the mentioned plant species. The movement patterns of N. tenuis between plant species varied substantially based on the plant species from which they were collected, which suggested each of the plant species had different functions for N. tenuis. Our findings revealed that planting multiple host plants would stabilize the N. tenuis population in biological control programs.


Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Aebi A, Brown PMJ, de Clercq P, Hautier L, Howe A, Ingels B, Ravn HP, Sloggett JJ, Zindel R, Thomas A (2011) Detecting arthropod intraguild predation in the field. BioControl 56:429–440
Balzan MV (2017) Flowering banker plants for the delivery of multiple agroecosystem services. Arthropod Plant Interact 11:743–754
Biondi A, Zappalà L, Di Mauro A, Tropea Garzia G, Russo A, Desneux N, Siscaro G (2016) Can alternative host plant and prey affect phytophagy and biological control by the zoophytophagous mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis? BioControl 61:79–90
Bouagga S, Urbaneja A, Rambla JL, Flors V, Granell A, Jaques JA, Pérez-Hedo M (2018) Zoophytophagous mirids provide pest control by inducing direct defences, antixenosis and attraction to parasitoids in sweet pepper plants. Pest Manag Sci 74:1286–1296
Calvo FJ, Bolckmans K, Belda JE (2012) Release rate for a pre-plant application of Nesidiocoris tenuis for Bemisia tabaci control in tomato. BioControl 57:809–817
Cano M, Vila E, Janssen D, Bretones G, Salvador E, Lara L, Tellez MM (2009) Selection of refuges for Nesidiocoris tenuis (Het.: Miridae) and Orius laevigatus (Het.: Anthocoridae): Virus reservoir risk assessment. IOBC/WPRS Bull 49:281–286
Castañé C, Arnó J, Gabarra R, Alomar O (2011) Plant damage to vegetable crops by zoophytophagous mirid predators. Biol Control 59:22–29
CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:12794–12797
Cooper WR, Horton DR, Unruh TR, Garczynski SF (2016) Gut content analysis of a phloem-feeding insect, Bactericera cockerelli (Hemiptera: Triozidae). Environ Entomol 45:938–944
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299
Frank SD (2010) Biological control of arthropod pests using banker plant systems: Past progress and future directions. Biol Control 52:8–16
Greenstone MH, Weber DC, Coudron TC, Payton ME (2011) Unnecessary roughness? Testing the hypothesis that predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis must be hand-collected to avoid cross-contamination. Mol Ecol Resour 11:286–293
Greenstone MH, Weber DC, Coudron TA, Payton ME, Hu JS (2012) Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 12:464–469
Harwood JD, Desneux N, Yoo HJS, Rowley DL, Greenstone MH, Obrycki JJ, O’Neil RJ (2007) Tracking the role of alternative prey in soybean aphid predation by Orius insidiosus: a molecular approach. Mol Ecol 16:4390–4400
Hayashi M, Abe J, Owashi Y, Miura K (2020) Estimation of movement from insectary plants to crop plants in Orius bugs (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) by molecular gut content analysis. Appl Entomol Zool 55:361–365
Hereward JP, Walter GH (2012) Molecular interrogation of the feeding behaviour of field captured individual insects for interpretation of multiple host plant use. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44435
Hinomoto N, Abe J, Nagasaka K (2017) Control of thrips in cucumber by Nesidiocoris tenuis-banker plant system. IOBC/WPRS Bull 124:207–213
Huang N, Enkegaard A, Osborne LS, Ramakers PMJ, Messelink GJ, Pijnakker J, Murphy G (2011) The banker plant method in biological control. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:259–278
Ingegno BL, Pansa MG, Tavella L (2011) Plant preference in the zoophytophagous generalist predator Macrolophus pygmaeus (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol Control 58:174–181
Kalendar R, Lee D, Schulman AH (2011) Java web tools for PCR, in silico PCR, and oligonucleotide assembly and analysis. Genomics 98:137–144
King RA, Read DS, Traugott M, Symondson WOC (2008) Molecular analysis of predation: a review of best practice for DNA-based approaches. Mol Ecol 17:947–963
King RA, Davey JS, Bell JR, Read DS, Bohan DA, Symondson WOC (2012) Suction sampling as a significant source of error in molecular analysis of predator diets. Bull Entomol Res 102:261–266
Kuusk AK, Cassel-Lundhagen A, Kvarnheden A, Ekbom B (2008) Tracking aphid predation by lycosid spiders in spring-sown cereals using PCR-based gut-content analysis. Basic Appl Ecol 9:718–725
Lins JC, van Loon JJA, Bueno VHP, Lucas-Barbosa D, Dicke M, van Lenteren JC (2014) Response of the zoophytophagous predators Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis to volatiles of uninfested plants and to plants infested by prey or conspecifics. BioControl 59:707–718
Messelink GJ, Bennison J, Alomar O, Ingegno BL, Tavella L, Shipp L, Palevsky E, Wäckers FL (2014) Approaches to conserving natural enemy populations in greenhouse crops: current methods and future prospects. BioControl 59:377–393
Nakaishi K, Fukui Y, Arakawa R (2011) Reproduction of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) on sesame. Japanese J Appl Entomol Zool 55:199–205 (in Japanese with English summary, figures, and tables)
Nakano R, Tsuchida Y, Doi M, Ishikawa R, Tatara A, Amano Y, Muramatsu Y (2016) Control of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on tomato in greenhouses by a combination of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) and banker plants. Annu Rep Kansai Plant Prot Soc 58:65–72 (in Japanese with English summary, figures, and tables)
Nakano R, Morita T, Okamoto Y, Fujiwara A, Yamanaka T, Adachi-Hagimori T (2021) Cleome hassleriana plants fully support the development and reproduction of Nesidiocoris tenuis. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-021-10079-6
Naselli M, Zappalà L, Gugliuzzo A, Tropea Garzia G, Biondi A, Rapisarda C, Cincotta F, Condurso C, Verzera A, Siscaro G (2017) Olfactory response of the zoophytophagous mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis to tomato and alternative host plants. Arthropod Plant Interact 11:121–131
Navarro SP, Jurado-Rivera JA, Gómez-Zurita J, Lyal CHC, Vogler AP (2010) DNA profiling of host-herbivore interactions in tropical forests. Ecol Entomol 35:18–32
Oveja MF, Arnó J, Gabarra R (2012) Effect of supplemental food on the fitness of four omnivorous predator species. IOBC/WPRS Bull 80:97–101
Parolin P, Bresch C, Desneux N, Brun R, Bout A, Boll R, Poncet C (2012a) Secondary plants used in biological control: A review. Int J Pest Manag 58:91–100
Parolin P, Bresch C, Poncet C, Desneux N (2012b) Functional characteristics of secondary plants for increased pest management. Int J Pest Manag 58:369–377
Parolin P, Bresch C, Poncet C, Suay-Cortez R, van Oudenhove L (2015) Testing basil as banker plant in IPM greenhouse tomato crops. Int J Pest Manag 61:235–242
Perdikis D, Fantinou A, Lykouressis D (2011) Enhancing pest control in annual crops by conservation of predatory Heteroptera. Biol Control 59:13–21
Pérez-Hedo M, Urbaneja A (2016) The zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis: a successful but controversial biocontrol agent in tomato crops. In: Horowitz AR, Ishaaya I (eds) Advances in insect control and resistance management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 121–138
Pérez-Hedo M, Suay R, Alonso M, Ruocco M, Giorgini M, Poncet C, Urbaneja A (2017) Resilience and robustness of IPM in protected horticulture in the face of potential invasive pests. Crop Prot 97:119–127
Pérez-Hedo M, Rambla JL, Granell A, Urbaneja A (2018) Biological activity and specificity of Miridae-induced plant volatiles. BioControl 63:203–213
Pérez-Hedo M, Riahi C, Urbaneja A (2021) Use of zoophytophagous mirid bugs in horticultural crops: current challenges and future perspectives. Pest Manag Sci 77:33–42
Pumariño L, Alomar O, Agustí N (2011) Development of specific ITS markers for plant DNA identification within herbivorous insects. Bull Entomol Res 101:271–276
Rim H, Uefune M, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J (2015) Olfactory response of the omnivorous mirid bug Nesidiocoris tenuis to eggplants infested by prey: Specificity in prey developmental stages and prey species. Biol Control 91:47–54
Sanchez JA, Gillespie DR, McGregor RR (2003a) The effects of mullein plants (Verbascum thapsus) on the population dynamics of Dicyphus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tomato greenhouses. Biol Control 28:313–319
Sanchez JA, Martinez-Cascales JI, Lacasa A (2003b) Abundance and wild host plants of predator mirids (Heteroptera: Miridae) in horticultural crops in the Southeast of Spain. IOBC/WPRS Bull 26:147–151
Sanchez JA, Gillespie DR, McGregor RR (2004) Plant preference in relation to life history traits in the zoophytophagous predator Dicyphus hesperus. Entomol Exp Appl 112:7–19
Sheppard SK, Harwood JD (2005) Advances in molecular ecology: tracking trophic links through predator-prey food-webs. Funct Ecol 19:751–762
Shimomoto M, Nakaishi K (2017) Supply system of the indigenous predator bug, Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) by relaying among greenhouses in Kochi Prefecture. Plant Prot 71:406–410 (in Japanese)
Sint D, Raso L, Kaufmann R, Traugott M (2011) Optimizing methods for PCR-based analysis of predation. Mol Ecol Resour 11:795–801
Thomine E, Jeavons E, Rusch A, Bearez P, Desneux N (2020) Effect of crop diversity on predation activity and population dynamics of the mirid predator Nesidiocoris tenuis. J Pest Sci 93:1255–1265
Toda S, Komazaki S (2002) Identification of thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on Japanese fruit trees by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism of the ribosomal ITS2 region. Bull Entomol Res 92:359–363
Tsugane T, Oida H, Kubo C, Shimizu K (2007) Development of a multiplex PCR assay for identification of Bemisia tabaci biotype B, biotype Q and Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Annu Rep Kanto-Tosan Plant Prot Soc 54:159–164 (in Japanese)
Urbaneja A, Tapia G, Stansly P (2005) Influence of host plant and prey availability on developmental time and survivorship of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Het.: Miridae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 15:513–518
Urbaneja A, González-Cabrera J, Arnó J, Gabarra R (2012) Prospects for the biological control of Tuta absoluta in tomatoes of the Mediterranean basin. Pest Manag Sci 68:1215–1222
Urbaneja-Bernat P, Bru P, González-Cabrera J, Urbaneja A, Tena A (2019) Reduced phytophagy in sugar-provisioned mirids. J Pest Sci 92:1139–1148
Walker GP, Perring TM, Freeman TP (2010) Life history, functional anatomy, feeding and mating behavior. In: Stansly PA, Naranjo SE (eds) Bemisia: bionomics and management of a global pest. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–160
Wallinger C, Sint D, Baier F, Schmid C, Mayer R, Traugott M (2015) Detection of seed DNA in regurgitates of granivorous carabid beetles. Bull Entomol Res 105:728–735
Wang Q, Bao WF, Yang F, Xu B, Yang YZ (2017) The specific host plant DNA detection suggests a potential migration of Apolygus lucorum from cotton to mungbean fields. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0177789
Yano E, Nakauchi M, Watanabe T, Watanabe H, Hosaka S, Nishimori S, Miura S, Kandori I, Hinomoto N (2020) Life history traits of Nesidiocoris tenuis on Bemisia tabaci and Thrips palmi. BioControl 65:155–164
Zhao Y, Chen Y (2014) Data mining applications with R. Academic Press, Amsterdam
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. T. Tezuka and S. Kohara (Agri-Soken Inc.) for providing Nesidiocoris tenuis colonies, and Dr. K. Kubota (NARO), K. Nakai (Kagawa Prefectural Agricultural Experiment Station), and D. Nakajima for providing arthropod or plant samples. We thank Dr. T. Mitsunaga (NARO) for advice on statistical analyses. This work was supported by Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Cross-Ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), “Technologies for creating next-generation agriculture, forestry, and fisheries” (funding agency: Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, NARO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors conceived and designed the research and conducted the experiments. RN analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. NH commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals (vertebrates) performed by either of the authors.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Marta Montserrat.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakano, R., Hinomoto, N. Tracking the movement of Nesidiocoris tenuis among banker plants and crops in a tomato greenhouse by DNA markers of host plants. BioControl 66, 659–671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-021-10085-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-021-10085-8


