Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond “greening”: which paradigms shape sustainable pest management strategies in the European Union?

  • Forum Paper
  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various strategies exist to manage agriculture pests with few or without conventional pesticides. Farmers can rely on ecosystem services delivered by agro-biodiversity or use biotechnologies and biological plant protection products (PPP). Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has developed as an approach that combines these tools. The adoption of IPM has been supported by the European Union (EU) in the recent years. In parallel, EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has strengthened its agri-environmental incentives to further protect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. These evolutions have been presented as the “greening” of the CAP. We argue that this “greening” aims at strengthening agricultural competitiveness while preserving biodiversity. Hence, we suggest that the EU policy is entrenched in a green productivism paradigm, which objective is to produce more with less to achieve green growth within capitalism. Nonetheless, this worldview does not content all European farmers. We explain that those who reject productivism treasure a sufficiency paradigm by refusing the use of biotechnologies and biological PPP to consolidate their autonomy, especially regarding markets. By producing enough, and not more with less, they achieve complementary objectives, notably meeting their consumers’ expectations and perpetuating their productive resources. We based our arguments on discussions with farmers, participation to various meetings between 2013 and 2017 where these issues were debated, and the analyses of the EU policies, scientific studies, as well as the farmer unions’ and the companies’ publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri MA (2004) Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 2:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA, Nicholls CI, Montalba R (2017) Technological approaches to sustainable agriculture at a crossroads: an agroecological perspective. Sustainability 9:349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzman M, Bàrberi P, Birch ANE, Boonekamp P, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh S, Graf B, Hommel B, Jensen JE, Kiss J, Kudsk P, Lamichhane JR, Messéan A, Moonen A-C, Ratnadass A, Ricci P, Sarah J-L, Sattin M (2015) Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1199–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer (2013) Symbiosis in crop protection. Res Bayer Sci Mag 25:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J, Ahnström J, Weibull A-C (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 42:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beus CE, Dunlap RE (1990) Conventional versus alternative agriculture: the paradigmatic roots of the debate. Rural Sociol 55:590–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund J, Westberg L, Geber U, Milestad R, Ahnström J (2009) Local selling as a driving force for increased on-farm biodiversity. J Sustain Agric 33:885–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brédart D, Hatt S, Méhu M, Francis F, Stassart PM (2017) Les savoirs paysans pour coordonner la conservation de la nature et agriculture. Pistes pour une prise en compte renforcée des compétences des agriculteurs dans l’action agro-environnementale. Mille Lieux 7:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • COPA-COGECA (2012) Copa-Cogeca declaration for the Rio + 20 United Nations conference green growth at the heart of sustainable development. https://copa-cogeca.eu/Download.ashx?ID=921522. Accessed 20 June 2019

  • Cui LL, Francis F, Heuskin S, Lognay G, Liu YJ, Dong J, Chen JL, Song X-M, Liu Y (2012) The functional significance of E-β-farnesene: does it influence the populations of aphid natural enemies in the fields? Biol Control 60:108–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czaja K, Góralczyk K, Struciński P, Hernik A, Korcz W, Minorczyk M, Łyczewska M, Ludwicki JK (2015) Biopesticides—towards increased consumer safety in the European Union. Pest Manag Sci 71:3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dainese M, Montecchiari S, Sitzia T, Sigura M, Marini L (2017) High cover of hedgerows in the landscape supports multiple ecosystem services in Mediterranean cereal fields. J Appl Ecol 54:380–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer I, Lindenthal T, Bartel-Kratochvil R, Zollitsch W (2010) Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: from structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks LV (2013) Bees, lies and evidence-based policy. Nature 494:283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EIP-AGRI (2018) Organic and “conventional” farmers joining forces for innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/2017-press-201711-organic_innovations_final.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2005) Agri-environment measures. Overview on general principles, types of measures and application. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/agrienv/rep_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2016

  • European Commission (2009a) Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/128/2009-11-25. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2009b) Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1107/oj. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2013a) Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1307&from=EN. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2013b) CAP reform—an explanation of the main elements. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-621_en.htm. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2014a) Overview of the 118 different rural development programmes (RDPs) for 2014–2020. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-development-2014-2020/country-files/common/rdp-list_en.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2019

  • European Commission (2014b) A healthy and sustainable environment for present and future generations—protecting the environment and maintaining our competitiveness goes hand-in-hand. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3456359b-4cb4-4a6e-9586-6b9846931463. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2016a) A partnership between Europe and farmers—The EU’s common agricultural policy (CAP): for our food, for our countryside, for our environment. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f08f5f20-ef62-11e6-8a35-01aa75ed71a1. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2016b) Speech by Commissioner Phil Hogan at COPA/COGECA Congress 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/hogan/announcements/speech-commissioner-phil-hogan-greek-parliament-6th-october-2016-athens-greece_en. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Commission (2018a) Statistical factsheet European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/statistics/factsheets/pdf/eu_en.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2019

  • European Commission (2018b) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council—11th financial report from the Commission and the European Parliament and the Council on the European agricultural guarantee fund—2017 financial year. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0628. Accessed 17 Apr 2019

  • European Coordination La Via Campesina (2007) Declaration of Nyéléni. http://www.eurovia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Nyeleni-Declaration-Mali-en.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Coordination La Via Campesina (2017) Commission communication on the future CAP: same old same old. http://www.eurovia.org/commission-communication-on-the-future-cap-same-old-same-old/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Coordination La Via Campesina (2018) ECVC declaration on agroecology: transforming society through food production and the peasant struggle. https://www.eurovia.org/agroecology-transforming-society-through-food-production-and-the-peasant-struggle/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Coordination La Via Campesina (2019) About ECVC. https://www.eurovia.org/about/. Accessed 25 Apr 2019

  • European Crop Protection Association (2018) About. http://www.ecpa.eu. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2013) Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:347:0487:0548:en:PDF. Accessed 17 Apr 2019

  • European Union (2019) Regulations, directives and other acts. https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/legal-acts_en. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

  • Eurostat (2019a) Organic operators by status of the registration process (from 2012 onwards). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=org_coptyp&lang=en. Accessed 23 Apr 2019

  • Eurostat (2019b) Organic crop area by agricultural production methods and crops (from 2012 onwards). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=org_cropar&lang=en. Accessed 23 Apr 2019

  • Garratt MPD, Senapathi D, Coston DJ, Mortimer SR, Potts SG (2017) The benefits of hedgerows for pollinators and natural enemies depends on hedge quality and landscape context. Agric Ecosyst Environ 247:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Landis DA, You M-S (2017) Habitat management to suppress pest populations: progress and prospects. Annu Rev Entomol 62:91–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett M, Lawrence A (2014) Multifunctional role of field margins in arable farming. Report for European Crop Protection Association by Cambridge Environmental Assessments, ADAS UK Ltd

  • Hatt S, Artru S, Brédart D, Lassois L, Francis F, Haubruge E, Garré S, Stassart PM, Dufrêne M, Monty A, Boeraeve F (2016) Towards sustainable food systems: the concept of agroecology and how it questions current research practices. A review. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 20:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatt S, Mouchon P, Lopes T, Francis F (2017) Effects of wildflower strips and an adjacent forest on aphids and their natural enemies in a pea field. Insects 8:99

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt S, Boeraeve F, Artru S, Dufrêne M, Francis F (2018a) Spatial diversification of agroecosystems to enhance biological control and other regulating services: an agroecological perspective. Sci Total Environ 621:600–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt S, Uyttenbroeck R, Lopes T, Chen J, Piqueray J, Monty A, Francis F (2018b) Effect of flower traits and hosts on the abundance of parasitoids in perennial multiple species wildflower strips sown within oilseed rape (Brassica napus) crops. Arthropod-Plant Interact 12:787–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt S, Uyttenbroeck R, Lopes T, Mouchon P, Osawa N, Piqueray J, Monty A, Francis F (2019) Identification of flower functional traits affecting abundance of generalist predators in perennial multiple species wildflower strips. Arthropod-Plant Interact 13:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill SB, MacRae RJ (1995) Conceptual framework for the transition from conventional to sustainable agriculture. J Sustain Agric 7:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld S, van Acker R (2019) Permaculture farmers consistently cultivate perennials, crop diversity, landscape heterogeneity and nature conservation. Renew Agric Food Syst. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170519000012. (in press)

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A (2016) Semiochemical strategies for tortricid moth control in apple orchards and vineyards in Italy. J Chem Ecol 42:571–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Iles A, Bacon C (2012) Diversified farming systems: an agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecol Soc 17:44

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamine C (2005) Settling shared uncertainties: local partnerships between producers and consumers. Sociol Rural 45:324–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamine C (2011) Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign. Cases from organic farming and IPM. J Rural Stud 27:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow L (2015) European transitions towards a corporate-environmental food regime: agroecological incorporation or contestation? J Rural Stud 40:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes T, Hatt S, Xu Q, Chen J, Liu Y, Francis F (2016) Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-based intercropping systems for biological pest control: a review. Pest Manag Sci 72:2193–2202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malézieux E, Jarne P, Aubertot J-N, Boiffin J, Lescourret F, Lauri P-E, Reteau A, Lucas P, Ratnadass A, Deguine J-P (2017) Applying agroecological principles to crop protection. In: Deguine J-P, Gloanec C, Laurent P, Ratnadass A, Aubertot J-N (eds) Agroecological crop protection. Quae/Springer, Versailles, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Manandhar R, Hooks CR, Wright MG (2009) Influence of cover crop and intercrop systems on Bemisia argentifolli (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation and associated squash silverleaf disorder in zucchini. Environ Entomol 38:442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muneret L, Mitchell M, Seufert V, Aviron S, Djoudi EA, Pétillon J, Plantegenest M, Thiéry D, Rusch A (2018) Evidence that organic farming promotes pest control. Nat Sustain 1:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natagriwal (2014) Les méthodes agroenvironnementales et climatiques du PwDR [2014–2020]. https://www.natagriwal.be/sites/default/files/kcfinder/Tableau-MAEC-2014-2020-FR-151018.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • Palm C, Blanco-Canqui H, DeClerck F, Gatere L, Grace P (2014) Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: an overview. Agric Ecosyst Environ 187:87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardon P, Reheul D, Mertens J, Reubens B, De Frenne P, De Smedt P, Proesmans W, van Vooren L, Verheyen K (2019) Gradients in abundance and diversity of ground dwelling arthropods as a function of distance to tree rows in temperate arable agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 270–271:114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pe’er G, Zinngrebe Y, Hauck J, Schindler S, Dittrich A, Zingg S, Tscharntke T, Oppermann R, Sutcliffe LME, Sirami C, Schmidt J, Hoyer C, Schleyer C, Lakner S (2017) Adding some green to the greening: improving the EU’s ecological focus areas for biodiversity and farmers. Conserv Lett 10:517–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett JA (2013) Food security: intensification of agriculture is essential, for which current tools must be defended and new sustainable technologies invented. Food Energy Secur 2:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett JA, Woodcock CM, Midega CAO, Khan ZR (2014) Push–pull farming systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 26:125–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J, Douds D, Seidel R (2005) Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55:573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirages DC, Ehrlich PR (1974) Ark II: social response to environmental imperatives. Viking Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porcel M, Andersson GKS, Pålsson J, Tasin M (2018) Organic management in apple orchards: higher impacts on biological control than on pollination. J Appl Ecol 55:2779–2789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido JS, Bocco G (2003) The traditional farming system of a Mexican indigenous community: the case of Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, Michoacán, Mexico. Geoderma 111:249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Saona C, Kaplan I, Braasch J, Chinnasamy D, Williams L (2011) Field responses of predaceous arthropods to methyl salicylate: a meta-analysis and case study in cranberries. Biol Control 59:294–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salliou N, Barnaud C (2017) Landscape and biodiversity as new resources for agro-ecology? Insights from farmers’ perspectives. Ecol Soc 22:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegwart M, Graillot B, Blachere Lopez C, Besse S, Bardin M, Nicot PC, Lopez-Ferber M (2015) Resistance to bio-insecticides or how to enhance their sustainability: a review. Front Plant Sci 6:381

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WE (2019) Give predators a complement: conserving natural enemy biodiversity to improve biocontrol. Biol Control 135:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syngenta (2018) Operation pollinator multifunctional landscapes: positive action for pollinators. https://www.syngenta.co.uk/file/7146/download?token=qSDvPd7t. Accessed 31 May 2019

  • Therond O, Duru M, Roger-Estrade J, Richard G (2017) A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 37:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Url B (2018) Don’t attack science agencies for political gain. Nature 553:391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UN Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) United Nation convention on biological diversity. Article 2: use of terms. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

  • van der Ploeg JD (2008) The new peasantries. Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Bolckmans K, Köhl J, Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A (2018) Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl 63:39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanloqueren G, Baret PV (2009) How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Res Policy 38:971–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C (2009) Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian J-F, Ferrer A, Peigné J (2014) Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Hatt S, Lopes T, Yong Z, Bodson B, Chen J, Francis F (2018) A push-pull strategy to control aphids combines intercropping with semiochemical releases. J Pest Sci 91:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol Econ 64:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinngrebe Y, Pe’er G, Schueler S, Schmitt J, Schmidt J, Lakner S (2017) The EU’s ecological focus areas—how experts explain farmers’ choices in Germany. Land Use Policy 65:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been co-funded by the University of Liège and the European Union (Marie-Curie Belgium International PostDoc-COFUND), Wallonie Bruxelles International (WBI.World), and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research to S. Hatt (P18396) and Grant-in-Aid to N. Osawa (18F18396)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Forest Ecology, Graduate school of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwake, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan

    Séverin Hatt & Naoya Osawa

  2. University of Liege, 7 Place du 20-Août, 4000, Liege, Belgium

    Séverin Hatt

Authors
  1. Séverin Hatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naoya Osawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Séverin Hatt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Dirk Babendreier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatt, S., Osawa, N. Beyond “greening”: which paradigms shape sustainable pest management strategies in the European Union?. BioControl 64, 343–355 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-019-09947-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-019-09947-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation