, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 307–316 | Cite as

Olfactory cues in host and host-plant recognition of a polyphagous ectoparasitoid Scleroderma guani

  • Li Li
  • Zhudong Liu
  • Jianghua SunEmail author


Olfactory bioassays were performed to investigate the specific odors utilized as host location cues by the beetle parasitoid, Scleroderma guani (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), a primary biological control agent against Monochamus alternates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), the most important vector beetle of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae), the causal agent for pine wilt disease. Female parasitoids were tested with volatiles and extracts derived from their host beetle. Behavioral assays (Y-olfactometer bioassay and circle arena) demonstrated the response of female parasitoids to odors from host plants damaged by beetle larvae and from their excreta. When available contact cues were additionally provided, the parasitoids showed particularly strong preferences for samples of fresh brown frass of larval beetles. To confirm the electroantennograms (EAG) activity of identified compounds, analyses were repeated with a synthetic blend composed predominantly of compounds in the crude extracts that had revealed apparent electrophysiological activity. Antennal responses to four monoterpenes and three oxygenated monoterpenes were among the strongest, which indicated their potential for use in development of semichemial-based management of the beetle.


Hymenoptera Bethylidae Semiochemicals Host location Behavioral experiments EAG 



We thank Dr. Daniel R. Miller (USDA Forest Service) for his review of an earlier version of the manuscript. Thanks also extend to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which improved the quality of the manuscript greatly. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370650 and 31360519), the CAS Knowledge Innovation Key Research Program (KSCX2-EW-05) and the State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents (ChineseIPM1205).


  1. Borden JH, Hunt DWA, Miller DR, Slessor KN (1986) Orientation in forest Coleoptera: an uncertain outcome of responses by individual beetles to variable stimuli. In: Payne TL, Birch MC, Kennedy CE (eds) Mechanisms in insect olfaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 97–109Google Scholar
  2. Bruce TJA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (2005) Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trend Plant Sci 10:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ding Y, Lu C, Han B, Pu H, Wu M (2001) Relationship among growth potential of pine, population density of Monochamus alternatus, and pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Chin J Appl Ecol 12:351–354Google Scholar
  4. Evans HE (1964) A synopsis of the American Bethylidae (Hymenoptera: Aculeata). Bull Mus Comp Zool 132:1–222Google Scholar
  5. Fan JT, Sun JH, Shi J (2007) Attraction of the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus, to volatiles from stressed host in China. Ann For Sci 64:67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA (2003) Mate choice in the face of costly competition. Behav Ecol 14:771–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gauld ID, Hanson PE (1995) The chrysidoid families. In: Hanson PE, Gauld ID (eds) The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 464–503Google Scholar
  8. Harrison GD (1987) Host-plant discrimination and evolution of feeding preference in the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Physiol Entomol 12:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart SJ (2013) The early stage of wood decay: wood/fungus interaction and its attraction to xylophagous Coleoptera, especially cerambycids and their hymenopteran parasitoids. PhD Dissertation. Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Held DW, Gonsiska P, Potter DA (2003) Evaluating companion planting and non-host masking odors for protecting roses from the Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J Econ Entomol 96:81–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lauzière I, Brodeur J, Pérez-Lachaud G (2001) Host stage selection and suitability in Cephalonomia stephanoderis Betrem (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), a parasitoid of the coffee berry borer. Biol Control 21:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leufvén A (1987) Chemical interactions between the spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus), its host tree (Picea abies), and associated microorganisms (especially yeasts) during tree colonisation. PhD Dissertation. Department of Chemical Ecology, Göteborg University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  13. Li L, Miller DR, Sun JH (2009) The influence of prior experience on preference and performance of a cryptoparasitoid Scleroderma guani (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) on beetle hosts. Ecol Entomol 34:725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li L, Wei W, Liu ZD, Sun JH (2010) Host adaptation of a gregarious parasitoid Sclerodermus harmandi in artificial rearing. BioControl 55:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu D, Li X, Liu X, Zhang Q (2007) Identification and molecular cloning of putative odorant-binding proteins and chemosensory protein from the Bethylid wasp, Scleroderma guani Xiao et Wu. J Chem Ecol 33:1359–1375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pettersson E (2001a) Volatile attractants for three Pteromalid parasitoids attacking concealed spruce bark beetles. Chemoecology 11:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pettersson E (2001b) Volatiles from potential hosts of Rhopalicus tutela a bark beetle parasitoid. J Chem Ecol 27:2219–2231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pettersson E, Sullivan B, Anderson P, Berisford C, Birgersson G (2000) Odor perception in the bark beetle parasitoid Roptrocerus xylophagorum exposed to host associated volatiles. J Chem Ecol 26:2507–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Randlkofer B, Obermaier E, Hilker M, Meiners T (2010) Vegetation complexity—the influence of plant species diversity and plant structures on plant chemical complexity and arthropods. Basic Appl Ecol 11:383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salom SM, Birgersson G, Payne TL, Berisford CW (1991) Electroantennogram responses of the southern pine beetle parasitoid Dinotiscus dendroctoni (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to potential semiochemicals. J Chem Ecol 17:2527–2538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sullivan BT, Berisford CW (2004) Semiochemicals from fungal associates of bark beetles may mediate host location behavior of parasitoids. J Chem Ecol 30:703–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wäschke N, Meiners T, Rostas M (2013) Foraging strategies of insect parasitoids in complex chemical environments. In: Wajnberg E, Colazza S (eds) Recent advances in chemical ecology of insect parasitoids, Wiley-Blackwell, UK, pp 193–224Google Scholar
  23. Wei JN, Kang L (2006) Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of a parasitic wasp to host plant volatiles induced by two leaf miner species. Chem Senses 31:467–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wei J, Wang L, Zhu J, Zhang S, Nandi OI, Kang L (2007) Plants attract parasitic wasps to defend themselves against insect pests by releasing hexenol. PLoS ONE 2:e852CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. White RA, Agosin M, Franklin RT, Webb JW (1980) Bark beetle pheromones: evidence for physiological synthesis mechanisms and their ecological implications. Z Angew Entomol 90:255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams L III, Rodriguez-Saona C, Castle SC, Zhu S (2008) EAG-active herbivore-induced plant volatiles modify behavioral responses and host attack by an egg parasitoid. J Chem Ecol 34:1190–1201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and RodentsInstitute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesGuizhou Normal UniversityGuiyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations