BioControl

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 789–795 | Cite as

Effects of an artificial diet on development, reproduction and digestive physiology of Chrysopa septempunctata

Article

Abstract

The effects of an artificial diet on growth, development, reproduction and digestive physiology of Chrysopa septempunctata Wesmael were determined. The results showed that the reproduction was highly correlated with weights of females and activities of trypsin-like and chymotrypsin-like enzymes of C. septempunctata. The influences of diet on the digestive physiology such as digestive enzyme activity of a predator may be used to assess the reproductive potential of a predator, and therefore to provide a way to speed up the development and screening of artificial diets.

Keywords

Artificial diet Chrysopa septempunctata Fecundity Digestive enzymes 

References

  1. Abdulmadzhid AA (1973) Control of Acyrthosiphon pisum with natural enemies and insecticides. Rastitelna Zashchita 21:39–41Google Scholar
  2. Agusti N, Cohen AC (2000) Lygus hesperus and L. lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae), phytophages, zoophages, or omnivores: evidence of feeding adaptations suggested by the salivary and midgut digestive enzymes. J Entomol Sci 35:176–186Google Scholar
  3. Boo KS, Chung IB, Han KS, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ (1998) Response of the lacewing Chrysopa cognata to pheromones of its aphid prey. J Chem Ecol 24:631–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd DW Jr, Cohen AC, Alverson DR (2002) Digestive enzymes and stylet morphology of Deraeocoris nebulosus (Hemiptera: Miridae), a predacious plant bug. Ann Entomol Soc Am 95:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broadway RM, Duffey SS (1988) The effect of plant protein quality on insect digestive physiology and the toxicity of plant proteinase inhibitors. J Insect Physiol 34:1111–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen AC (1998a) Solid-to-liquid feeding: the inside(s) story of extra-oral digestion in predaceous Arthropoda. Am Entomol 44:103–116Google Scholar
  7. Cohen AC (1998b) Biochemical and morphological dynamics and predatory feeding habits in terrestrial Heteroptera. In: Coll M, Ruberson JR (eds) Predatory Heteroptera in agroecosystems: their ecology and use in biological control. Thomas Say Publications, Entomological Society of America, Lanham, USA, pp 21–32Google Scholar
  8. Cohen AC, Tang R (1997) Relative prey weight influences handling time and biomass extraction in Sinea confusa and Zelus renardii (Heteroptera: Reduviidae). Environ Entomol 26:559–565Google Scholar
  9. El-Arnaouty SA, Galal H, Beyssat-Arnaouty V, Ferran A, Grenier S (2006) Influence of artificial diet supplements on developmental features of Chrysoperla carnea Stephens. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 16:29–32Google Scholar
  10. Erlanger BF, Kokowsky N, Cohen W (1961) The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates of trypsin. Arch Biochem Biophys 95:271–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans EW (1982) Consequences of body size for fecundity in the predatory stinkbug, Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 75:418–420Google Scholar
  12. Felton GW (1996) Nutritive quality of plant protein: sources of variation and insect herbivore responses. Arch Insect Biochem 32:107–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García M, Farinós GP, Castañera P, Ortego F (2012) Digestion, growth and reproductive performance of the zoophytophagous rove beetle Philonthus quisquiliarius (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) fed on animal and plant based diets. J Insect Physiol 58:1334–1342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grenier S, De Clercq P (2003) Comparison of artificially vs. naturally reared natural enemies and their potential for use in biological control. In: van Lenteren JC (ed) Quality control and production of biological control agents: theory and testing procedures. CABI Publications, Wallingford, UK, pp 115–131Google Scholar
  15. Habibi J, Backus EA, Coudron TA, Brandt SL (2001) Effect of different host substrates on hemipteran salivary protein profiles. Entomol Exp Appl 98:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin M, Chen H, Wang S, Tong Z (2007) Development of artificial diet for Chrysopa pallens larva. Chin J Biol Control 23:316–321Google Scholar
  17. Medina P, Budia F, Del Estal P, Viñuela E (2004) Influence of azadirachtin, a botanical insecticide, on Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) reproduction: toxicity and ultrastructural approach. J Econ Entomol 97:43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mochizuki A (1998) Characteristics of digestive proteases in the gut of some insect orders. Appl Entomol Zool 33:401–408Google Scholar
  19. Mohaghegh-Neyshabouri J, De Clercq P, Degheele D (1996) Influence of female body weight on reproduction in laboratory-reared Podisus nigrispinus and Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Meded Fac Landbouwk Toeg Biol Wet Univ Gent 61:693–696Google Scholar
  20. Mulligan EA, Ferry N, Jouanin L, Romeis J, Gatehouse AMR (2010) Characterisation of adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) digestive physiology: impact of a cysteine protease inhibitor and a synthetic pyrethroid. Pest Manag Sci 66:325–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliveira JA, Oliveira MGA, Guedes RNC, Soares MJ (2006) Morphology and preliminary enzyme characterization of the salivary glands from the predatory bug Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Bull Entomol Res 96:251–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pappas ML, Broufas GD, Tsarsitalidou OK, Koveos DS (2011) Development and reproduction of the lacewings Dichochrysa flavifrons and Dichochrysa zelleri (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) fed on two prey species. Ann Entomol Soc Am 104:726–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pascual-Ruiz S, Carrillo L, Álvarez-Alfageme F, Ruiz M, Castañera P, Ortego F (2009) The effects of different prey regimes on the proteolytic digestion of nymphs of the spined soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Bull Entomol Res 99:487–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Principi MM, Canard M (1984) Feeding habits. In: Canard M, Semeria Y, New TR (eds) Biology of Chrysopidae. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 76–92Google Scholar
  25. Rahbé Y, Deraison C, Bonadé-Bottino M, Girard C, Nardon C, Jouanin L (2003) Effects of the cysteine protease inhibitor oryzacystatin (OC-I) on different aphids and reduced performance of Myzus persicae on OC-I expressing transgenic oilseed rape. Plant Sci 164:441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riddick EW (2009) Benefits and limitations of factitious prey and artificial diets on life parameters of predatory beetles, bugs, and lacewings: a mini-review. BioControl 54:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SAS Institute (2004) SAS/STAT© 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Sattar M, Fatima B, Ahmed N, Abro GH (2007) Development of larval artificial diet of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Pak J Zool 39:103–107Google Scholar
  29. Sighinolfi L, Febvay G, Dindo ML, Rey M, Pageaux J, Baronio P, Grenier S (2008) Biological and biochemical characteristics for quality control of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) reared on a liver-based diet. Arch Insect Biochem 68:26–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith RA, Nordlund DA (2000) Mass rearing technology for biological control agents of Lygus spp. Southwest Entomol 23:121–127Google Scholar
  31. Takesue Y, Yokota K, Nishi Y, Taguchi R, Ikezawa H (1986) Solubilization of trehalase from rabbit renal and intestinal brush-border membranes by a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. FEBS Lett 201:5–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Daane KM, Hagen KS (2000) Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Am Entomol 46:26–38Google Scholar
  33. Thompson SN (1999) Nutrition and culture of entomophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 44:561–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ulhaq MM, Sattar A, Salihah Z, Farid A, Usman A, Khattak SUK (2006) Effect of different artificial diets on the biology of adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea Stephens.). Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 28:1–8Google Scholar
  35. Watanabe Y, Shimamori Y, Ozaki M, Uchida M, Fujimoto Y (1984) Purification of a membrane-bound neutral endopeptidase from rat kidney and its activation by polyamines. J Biochem 95:1725–1732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zaki FN, Gesraha MA (2001) Production of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) (Neuropt., Chrysopidae) reared on semi-artificial diet based on the algae Chlorella vulgaris. J Appl Entomol 125:97–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zanuncio JC, Molina-Rugama AJ, Serrao J, Pratissoli D (2001) Nymphal development and reproduction of Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) fed with combinations of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) pupae and Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) larvae. Biocontrol Sci Technol 11:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeng F, Cohen AC (2000) Comparison of α-amylase and protease activities of a zoophytophagous and two phytozoophagous Heteroptera. Comp Biochem Phys A 126:101–106Google Scholar
  39. Zhang F, Wang S, Luo C, Chen Y, Li F (2004) Effects of the artificial diets and breeding means on growth and development of Chrysopa septempunctata Wesmael. Plant Prot 30:36–40Google Scholar
  40. Zhao J (1988) Studies on the bionomics of Chrysopa septempunctata Wesmael. Acta Phytophyl Sin 15:123–127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Pest Management in Crops, Ministry of AgricultureInstitute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations