Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differential induction of grapevine resistance and defense reactions against Botrytis cinerea by bacterial mixtures in vineyards

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous experiments showed that seven bacteria identified as Acinetobacter lwoffii (PTA-113 and PTA-152), Bacillus subtilis (PTA-271), Pantoea agglomerans (PTA-AF1 and PTA-AF2) and Pseudomonas fluorescens (PTA-268 and PTA-CT2) induced systemic resistance in grapevine against Botrytis cinerea. Based on these findings, we investigated biocontrol capacity of different mixtures under vineyard conditions over three consecutive years. Treatments with bacterial mixtures were shown to induce systemic resistance against B. cinerea on year 2. Efficacy and duration of such a disease control seemed to be reinforced on year three without renewal of bacterial treatments. Accordingly, the effectiveness of induced resistance varied with mixture type of bacteria and was accompanied by a stimulation of chitinase and β-1,3 glucanase activities in both leaves and berries. Interestingly, treatments with mixtures containing both selected strains of P. agglomerans (PTA-AF1 + PTA-AF2) appeared as the most effective in triggering systemically the plant defense reactions and reducing the symptoms of grey mould disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn II-P, Lee S-W, Suh S-C (2007) Rhizobacteria-induced priming in Arabidopsis is dependent on ethylene, jasmonic acid, and NPR1. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 20:759–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amellal N, Burtin G, Bartoli F, Heulin T (1998) Colonization of wheat roots by an exopolysaccharide-producing Pantoea agglomerans strain and its effect on rhizosphere soil aggregation. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3740–3747

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LM, Burtin G, Bartoli F, Heulin T (2004) An extracellular protease of Pseudomonas fluorescens inactivates antibiotics of Pantoea agglomerans strain and its effect on rhizosphere soil aggregation. Phytopathology 94:1228–1234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asaka O, Shoda M (1996) Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping off of tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4081–4085

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz A, Poinssot B, Daire X, Adrian M, Bézier A, Lambert B, Joubert J-M, Pugin A (2003) Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 16:1118–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz A, Trotel-Aziz P, Dhuicq L, Jeandet P, Couderchet M, Vernet G (2006) Chitosan oligomers and copper sulfate induce grapevine defense reactions and resistance to gray mold and downy mildew. Phytopathology 96:1188–1194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz A, Gauthier A, Bézier A, Poinssot B, Joubert JM, Pugin A, Heyraud A, Baillieul F (2007) Elicitor and resistance-inducing activities of β-1,4 cellodextrins in grapevine, comparison with β-1,3 glucans and α-1,4 oligogalacturonides. J Exp Bot 58:1463–1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A (2010) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42:669–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conrath U, Pieterse CMJ, Mauch-Mani B (2002) Priming in plant–pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 7:210–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Côté F, Ham KS, Hahn MG, Bergmann CW (1998) Oligosaccharide elicitors in host–pathogen interactions. Generation, perception, and signal transduction. In: Biswas BB, Das H (eds) Subcellular biochemistry. Plenum Press, New York, pp 385–432

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer M, van der Sluis I, van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM (1999) Combining fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. strains to enhance suppression of fusarium wilt of radish. Eur J Plant Pathol 105:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer M, Bom P, Kindt F, Keurentjes JJB, van der Sluis I, van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM (2003) Control of fusarium wilt of radish by combining Pseudomonas putida strains that have different disease-suppressive mechanisms. Phytopathology 93:626–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy BK, Weller DM (1995) Suppression of take-all of wheat using Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis individually and in combination with fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Plant Dis 79:907–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han DY, Coplin DL, Bauer WD, Hoitink HAJ (2000) A rapid bioassay for screening rhizosphere microorganisms for their ability to induce systemic resistance. Phytopathology 90:327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffland E, Pieterse CMJ, Bik L, van Pelt JA (1995) Induced systemic resistance in radish is not associated with accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 46:309–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iavicoli A, Boutet E, Buchala A, Métraux JP (2003) Induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to root inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 16:851–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janisiewicz WJ, Korsten L (2002) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:411–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leeman M, van Pelt JA, Den Ouden FM, Heinsbroek M, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B (1995) Induction of systemic resistance against fusarium wilt of radish by lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology 85:1021–1027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magnin-Robert M (2007) Protection of grapevine against Botrytis cinerea and stimulation of defense mechanisms by using bacteria originated from Champagne vineyard. Thesis, University of Reims, France

  • Magnin-Robert M, Trotel-Aziz P, Quantinet D, Biagianti S, Aziz A (2007) Biological control of Botrytis cinerea by selected grapevine-associated bacteria and stimulation of chitinase and β-1,3 glucanase activities under field conditions. Eur J Plant Pathol 118:43–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurhöfer M, Hase C, Meuwly P, Métraux JP, Défago G (1994) Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0: influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology 84:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado-Blanco J, Bakker PAHM (2007) Interactions between plants and beneficial Pseudomonas spp. exploiting bacterial traits for crop protection. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 92:367–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meziane H, van der Sluis I, van Loon LC, Höfte M, Bakker PAHM (2005) Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants. Mol Plant Pathol 6:177–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes C, Usall J, Teixido N, Vinas I (2001) Biological control of postharvest pear diseases using a bacterium, Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2. Int J Food Microbiol 70:53–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes C, Usall J, Teixido N, Fons E, Vinas I (2002) Post-harvest biological control by Pantoea agglomerans (CPA-2) on golden delicious apples. J Appl Microbiol 92:247–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse CMJ, van Wees SCM, Hoffland E, van Pelt JA, van Loon LC (1996) Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell 8:1225–1237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers JM, Leeman M, van Oorschot MMP, van der Sluis I, Schippers B, Bakker PAHM (1995) Dose–response relationships in biological control of Fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 85:1075–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach GS, Kloepper JW (1998) Mixtures of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology 88:1158–1164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosslenbroich H-J, Stuebler D (2000) Botrytis cinerea—history of chemical control and novel fungicides for its management. Crop Prot 19:557–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B, Bakker AW, Bakker PAHM (1987) Interactions of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices. Annu Rev Phytopathol 25:339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjamos SE, Flemetakis E, Paplomatas EJ, Katinakis P (2005) Induction of resistance to Verticillium dahliae in Arabidopsis thaliana by the biocontrol agent K-165 and pathogenesis-related proteins gene expression. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 18:555–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trotel-Aziz P, Couderchet M, Vernet G, Aziz A (2006) Chitosan elicits defense reactions in grapevine leaves and inhibits development of Botrytis cinerea. Eur J Plant Pathol 114:405–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trotel-Aziz P, Couderchet M, Biagianti S, Aziz A (2008) Characterization of new bacterial biocontrol agents Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Pantoea and Pseudomonas spp. mediating grapevine resistance against Botrytis cinerea. Environ Exp Bot 64:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Loon LC, van Strien EA (1999) The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 55:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Wees SCM, Pieterse CMJ, Trijssenaar A, Van’t Westende YAM, Hartog F, van Loon LC (1997) Differential induction of systemic resistance in Arabidopsis by biocontrol bacteria. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 10:716–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Wees SCM, De Swart EAM, van Pelt JA, van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2000) Enhancement of induced disease resistance by simultaneous activation of salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:8711–8716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen BWM, Glazebrook J, Zhu T, van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2004) The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 17:895–908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen BWM, Trotel-Aziz P, Couderchet M, Höfte M, Aziz A (2010) Pseudomonas spp.-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea is associated with induction and priming of defence responses in grapevine. J Exp Bot 61:249–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen BWM, Trotel-Aziz P, Jeandet P, Baillieul F, Aziz A (2011) Improved resistance against Botrytis cinerea by grapevine-associated bacteria that induce a prime oxidative burst and phytoalexin production. Phytopathology 101:768–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Ohara Y, Nakayashiki H, Tosa Y, Mayama S (2005) Microarray analysis of the gene expression profile induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens FPT9601²-T5 in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 18:385–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the GDV members for their help with disease evaluation in vineyards. We also thank Dr. Amor Keziou for his kind help with the statistical analysis and Pr. Laurent Debelle for advices. We also gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Champagne Ardenne Regional Council (“Région Champagne Ardenne”, France) through Europol’Agro (program VINEAL, Reims, France).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. URVVC, EA 4707, Université de Reims, BP 1039, 51687, Reims Cedex 2, France

    M. Magnin-Robert, M. Couderchet, A. Aziz & P. Trotel-Aziz

  2. Chambre d’Agriculture de la Marne, Complexe Agricole du Mont Bernard, Route de Suippes, BP 525, 51009, Châlons-en-Champagne Cedex, France

    D. Quantinet

Authors
  1. M. Magnin-Robert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Quantinet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Couderchet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Aziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Trotel-Aziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Trotel-Aziz.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Monica Höfte

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnin-Robert, M., Quantinet, D., Couderchet, M. et al. Differential induction of grapevine resistance and defense reactions against Botrytis cinerea by bacterial mixtures in vineyards. BioControl 58, 117–131 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9474-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9474-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation