Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of host plant, prey species and intergenerational changes on the prey preferences of the predatory mirid Macrolophus caliginosus

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The outdoor establishment of non-native biocontrol agents released for inundative control of glasshouse pests is determined primarily by two factors: ecophysiological compatibility with local climate, particularly winter cold tolerance, and ability to locate and utilise wild prey. Observations on the number and diversity of acceptable wild prey as part of an assessment of establishment potential therefore overlap with more focused studies to determine host range. This study investigated two aspects of the interactions between biocontrol agents and non-target prey that are rarely considered in tests for establishment or host range: the role of different host plant–prey associations in modifying the development and reproduction of biocontrol agents, and the longer term sustainability of such relationships beyond the single generation observed in most laboratory studies. Using the glasshouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) predator Macrolophus caliginosus Wagner (Hemiptera: Miridae) as a case study, the mirid was able to sustain viable populations over three generations on the related cabbage whitefly Aleyrodes proletella (Linnaeus) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), including when these prey were feeding on different host plants (Chinese cabbage, cabbage and Brussels sprout). However, the rate of development, fecundity and mortality of the predator varied between the different prey and host plant combinations, and in all cases differed than when feeding on its glasshouse prey T. vaporariorum reared on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). The results are discussed in the light of the current debate on methods for conducting host range testing as part of an environmental risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2 
Fig. 3 

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA, Kobayashi C, Thaler JS (1999) Influence of prey availability and induced host–plant resistance on omnivory by western flower thrips. Ecology 80:518–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale JS (2005) Effects of temperature on the establishment of non-native biocontrol agents: the predictive power of laboratory data. In: Hoddle MS (Compiler) Proceedings of the second international symposium on biological control of arthropods, vol. 2, pp 593–602

  • Cohen AC (1996) Plant feeding by predatory Heteroptera: evolutionary and adaptational aspects of trophic switching. In: Alomar O, Wiedenmann RN (eds) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: implications for life history and integrated pest management. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq P (2002) Dark clouds and their silver linings: exotic generalist predators in augmentative biological control. Neotrop Entomol 31:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkegaard A, Brodsgaard HF, Hansen DL (2001) Macrolophus caliginosus: functional response to whiteflies and preference and switching capacity between whiteflies and spider mites. Entomol Exp Appl 101:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauvel G., Malausa JC, Kaspar B (1987) Laboratory studies on the main biological characteristics of Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera, Miridae). Entomophaga 32:529–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foglar H, Malausa JC, Wajnberg E (1990) The functional response and preference of Macrolophus caliginosus Heteroptera, Miridae for two of its prey—Myzus persicae and Tetranychus urticae. Entomophaga 35:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen DL, Brodsgaard HF, Enkegaard A (1999) Life table characteristics of Macrolophus caliginosus preying upon Tetranychus urticae. Entomol Exp Appl 93:269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AJ, Bale JS, Tullett AG, Worland MR, Walters KFA (2002a) Effects of temperature on the establishment potential of the predatory mite Amblyseius californicus McGregor (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the UK. J Insect Physiol 48:593–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AJ, Tullett AG, Bale JS, Walters KFA (2002b) Effects of temperature on the establishment potential in the UK of the non-native glasshouse biocontrol agent Macrolophus caliginosus. Physiol Entomol 27:112–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatherly IS, Bale JS, Walters KFA, Worland MR (2004) Thermal biology of Typhlodromips montdorensis: implications for its introduction as a glasshouse biological control agent in the UK. Entomol Exp Appl 111:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatherly IS, Bale JS, Walters KFA (2005a) UK winter egg survival in the field and laboratory diapause of Typhlodromips montdorensis. Physiol Entomol 30:87–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatherly IS, Hart AJ, Tullett AG, Bale JS (2005b) Use of thermal data as a screen for the establishment potential of non-native biological control agents in the UK. BioControl 50:687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatherly IS, Pedersen BP, Bale JS (2008) Establishment potential of the predatory mirid Dicyphus hesperus in northern Europe. BioControl. doi:10.1007/s10526-007-9099-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Haye T, Goulet H, Mason PG, Kuhlmann U (2005) Does fundamental host range match ecological host range? A retrospective case study of a Lygus plant bug parasitoid. BioControl 35:55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann U, Schaffner U, Mason PG (2006) Selection of non-target species for host specificity testing. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods. Methods and risk assessment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Malausa JC, Trottin-Caudal Y (1996) Advances in the strategy of use of the predaceous bug Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera: Miridae) in glasshouse crops. In: Alomar O, Wiedenmann RN (eds) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: implications for life history and integrated pest management. Entomological Society of America, pp 178–189

  • Martinez-Cascales JI, Cenis JL, Cassis G, Sanchez JA (2006) Species identity of Macrolophus melanotoma (Costa 1853) and Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur 1839) (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae) based on morphological and molecular data and bionomic implications. Insect Syst Evol 37(4):385–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Montserrat M, Albajes R, Castane C (2000) Functional response of four Heteropteran predators preying on greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Env Entomol 29:1075–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo SE, Gibson RL (1996) Phytophagy in predaceous Heteroptera: effects on life history and population dynamics. In: Alomar O, Wiedenmann RN (eds) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: implications for life history and integrated pest management. Entomol Soc Am, Lanham, Maryland, pp 57–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdikis D, Lykouressis D (2000) Effects of various items, host plants, and temperatures on the development and survival of Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae). Biol Control 17:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riudavets J, Castane C (1998) Identification and evaluation of native predators of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in the Mediterranean. Env Entomol 27:86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson AC, Jacobson RJ (1999) Macrolophus caliginosus Wagner (Heteroptera: Miridae): a predator causing damage to UK tomatoes. IOBC Bull 22:213–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands DPA (1998) Guidelines for testing host specificity of agents for biological control of arthropod pests. In: Zalucki MP, Drew R, White G (eds) Pest management—future challenges. Proceedings of the sixth Australian applied entomological research conference, Brisbane. University of Queensland Press, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullett AG, Hart AJ, Worland MR, Bale JS (2004) Assessing the effects of low temperature on the establishment potential in Britain of the non-native biological control agent Eretmocerus eremicus. Physiol Entomol 29:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Murray TJ (2004a) Overview of testing schemes and designs used to estimate host ranges. In: van Driesche RG, Reardon R (eds) Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: a guide to best practice. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driesche RG, Murray TJ (2004b) Parameters used in laboratory host range tests. In: van Driesche RG, Reardon R (eds) Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: a guide to best practice. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Loomans AJM (2006) Environmental risk assessment: methods for comprehensive evaluation and quick scan. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods. Methods and risk assessment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 254–272

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Babendreier D, Bigler F, Burgio G, Hokkanen HMT, Kuske S, Loomans AJM, Menzler-Hokkanen I, Rijn PCJV, Thomas MB, Tommasini MG, Zeng QQ (2003) Environmental risk assessment of exotic natural enemies used in inundative biological control. BioControl 48:3–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Bale J, Bigler F, Hokkanen HMT, Loomans AJM (2006a) Assessing risks of releasing exotic biological control agents of arthropod pests. Annu Rev Entomol 51:609–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Cock MJW, Hoffmeister TS, Sands DPA (2006b) Host specificity in arthropod biological control, methods for testing and interpretation of the data. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods. Methods and risk assessment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 38–63

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schelt J, Klapwijk J, Letard M, Aucouturier C (1995) The use of Macrolophus caliginosus as a whitefly predator in protected crops. In: Gerling D, Mayer RT (eds) Bemisia: 1995. Taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management. Intercept, Andover, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). We are grateful to Dr John Martin (Natural History Museum, London) for identification of the cabbage whitefly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    I. S. Hatherly, B. P. Pedersen & J. S. Bale

Authors
  1. I. S. Hatherly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. P. Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. S. Bale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Bale.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Dirk Babendreier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatherly, I.S., Pedersen, B.P. & Bale, J.S. Effect of host plant, prey species and intergenerational changes on the prey preferences of the predatory mirid Macrolophus caliginosus . BioControl 54, 35–45 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-008-9155-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-008-9155-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation