Skip to main content
Log in

The host range and biology of Cometaster pyrula; a biocontrol agent for Acacia nilotica subsp. indica in Australia

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prickly acacia, Acacia nilotica subsp. indica (Benth.) Brenan, a major weed of the Mitchell Grass Downs of northern Queensland, Australia, has been the target of biological control projects since the 1980s. The leaf-feeding caterpillar Cometaster pyrula (Hopffer) was collected from Acacia nilotica subsp. kraussiana (Benth.) Brenan during surveys in South Africa to find suitable biological control agents, recognised as a potential agent, and shipped into a quarantine facility in Australia. Cometaster pyrula has a life cycle of approximately 2 months during which time the larvae feed voraciously and reach 6 cm in length. Female moths oviposit a mean of 339 eggs. When presented with cut foliage of 77 plant species, unfed neonates survived for 7 days on only Acacia nilotica subsp. indica and Acacia nilotica subsp. kraussiana. When unfed neonates were placed on potted plants of 14 plant species, all larvae except those on Acacia nilotica subsp. indica and Acacia nilotica subsp. kraussiana died within 10 days of placement. Cometaster pyrula was considered to be highly host specific and safe to release in Australia. Permission to release C. pyrula in Australia was obtained and the insect was first released in north Queensland in October 2004. The ecoclimatic model CLIMEX indicated that coastal Queensland was climatically suitable for this insect but that inland areas were only marginally suitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briese D.T., Walker A., Pettit W.J., Sagliocco J.L. (2002). Host-specificity of candidate agents for the biological control of Onopordum spp. thistles in Australia: an assessment of testing procedures. Biocontr. Sci. Tech. 12(2):149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey A.P. (1997). The biology of Australian weeds 29. Acacia nilotica ssp. indica (Benth.) Brenan. Plant Prot. Q. 12(1):7–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Marohasy J. (1995). Prospects for the biological control of prickly acacia, Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Del. (Mimosaceae) in Australia. Plant Prot. Q. 10(1):24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslin B.R. (2001). Introduction to Acacia. Fl. Australia. 11A:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohyuddin, A.I., 1981. Phytophages associated with Acacia nilotica in Pakistan and possibilities of their introduction into Australia. In: E.S. Del Fosse (ed), Fifth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, CSIRO. pp. 161–166

  • A.E. Orchard and P.M. McCarthy (eds), (1998). Flora of Australia Volume 12, Mimosaceae (excl. Acacia), Caesalpiniaceae. CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Orchard A.E. and Wilson A.J.G. (eds), (2001a). Flora of Australia Volume 11A, Mimosaceae, Acacia Part 1. ABRS/CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Orchard A.E. and Wilson A.J.G. (eds), (2001b). Flora of Australia Volume 11B, Mimosaceae, Acacia Part 2. ABRS/CSIRO, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, R.W., 1989. Lepidopterorum Catalogus (New Series), fasc. 118, Noctuidae (3 Parts). E. J. Brill/Flora & Fauna Publications

  • Sutherst, R.W., 2003. Prediction of species geographical ranges. J. Biogeogr. 30(1–12)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst R.W. and Maywald G.E. (1985). A computerized system for matching climates in ecology. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 13:281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherst R.W., Maywald G.E., Bottomley W. and Bourne A. (2004). CLIMEX v2. Hearne Scientific Software, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp J.R. and Lynch R. (2000). The Determination of Weeds of National Significance. National Weeds Strategy Executive Committee, Launceston, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapshere A.J. (1974). A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Ann. Appl. Biol. 77:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wapshere A.J. (1975). A protocol for programmes for biological control of weeds. PANS 21(3):295–303

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the staff of the South African Field Station (A.B. Witt, S. Docherty and H. Steenkamp) and staff of the Plant Protection Research Institute (S. Neser, R. Stals and H. Zimmermann) for undertaking the preliminary studies or administrative arrangements that made this study possible. Martin Kruger of the Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, provided expert identification of the insect and additional records about the insect’s distribution. Martin Honey of the British Natural History Museum, London, supplied information on the insect’s distribution. Bob Sutherst of CSIRO Entomology kindly advised on the CLIMEX model. The very considerable collection of plants used for host range testing was sourced and maintained by Michele Rogers. Cathy Lockett and Margie Robinson of the Tropical Weeds Research Centre, Charters Towers, reared and released the insect. Caroline Hauxwell, Queensland Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries, Indooroopilly, provided pathology diagnoses and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. A. Palmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, W.A., Senaratne, K.A.D.W. The host range and biology of Cometaster pyrula; a biocontrol agent for Acacia nilotica subsp. indica in Australia. Biocontrol 52, 129–143 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9003-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9003-y

Key words

Navigation