Skip to main content
Log in

Leaf scarring by the weevils Neochetina eichhorniae and N. bruchi enhances infection by the fungus Cercospora piaropi on waterhyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive or synergistic effects among introduced and native insect and plant pathogen agents are necessary to achieve biological control of waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), a globally damaging aquatic weed. In field plots, plants were infested with waterhyacinth weevils (Neoechetina bruchi and N. eichhorniae) and leaves were scarred by weevil feeding. Subsequent infection by the fungal pathogen Cercospora piaropi caused necrotic lesions to form on leaves. Necrosis development was 7.5- and 10.5-fold greater in plots augmented with both weevils and C. piaropi and weevils alone, respectively, than in plots receiving only C. piaropi. Twenty-four days after weevil infestation, the percentage of laminar area covered by lesions on third-youngest and oldest live leaves was elevated 2.3–2.5-fold in plots augmented with weevils. Scar density and necrosis coverage on young leaf laminae were positively correlated, even though antipathogenic soluble peroxidases were elevated 3-fold in plots augmented with weevils alone or weevils and C. piaropi. Combined weevil and fungal augmentation decreased shoot densities and leaves per plant. In a no-choice bioassay, weevil feeding on oldest but not young leaves was reduced 44 two weeks after C. piaropi inoculation. Protein content and peroxidase activities were elevated 2–6-fold in oldest leaves three weeks after inoculation. Augmentation with both waterhyacinth weevils and C. piaropi led to the development of an additive biological control impact, mediated by one or more direct interactions between these agents, and not plant quality effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E.E. Addor (1977) A field test of selected insects and pathogens for control of waterhyacinths Technical Report A-77-2. US Army Chief of Engineers Washington, DC. 44

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Aquilar O.M. Camarena T.D. Center G. Bojórquez (2003) ArticleTitleBiological control of waterhyacinth in Sinaloa, Mexico with the weevils Neochetina eichhorniae and N. bruchi BioControl 48 595–608

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Barreto R. Charudattan A. Pomella R. Hanada (2000) ArticleTitleBiological control of neotropical aquatic weeds with fungi Crop Prot. 19 697–703

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Berger (1981) ArticleTitleComparison of the Gompertz and logistic equations to describe plant disease progress Phytopathology 71 716–719

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Caesar (2000) Insect-pathogen synergisms are the foundation of weed biocontrol. N.R. Spencer (Eds) Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. 4–14 July 1999 Montana State University Bozeman, Montana. 793–798

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Caesar (2003) ArticleTitleSynergistic interaction of soilborne plant pathogens and root-attacking insects in classical biological control of an exotic rangeland weed Biol. Control 28 144–153

    Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Center (1985) Leaf life tables: a viable method for assessing sublethal effects of herbivory on waterhyacinth E.S. Delfosse (Eds) Proceedings VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. 19–25 August 1984 Agriculture Canada Vancouver, Canada 511–-524

    Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Center (1987) ArticleTitleInsects, mites, and plant pathogens as agents of waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) leaf and ramet mortality Lake Reservoir Mgmt 3 285–293 Occurrence Handle10.1080/07438148709354784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Center F.A. Dray G.P. Jubinsky M.J. Grodowitz (1999) ArticleTitleBiological control of waterhyacinth under conditions of maintenance management: can herbicides and insects be integrated? Environ Mgmt. 23 241–256

    Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Center F.A. Dray G.P. Jubinsky A.J. Leslie (1999) ArticleTitleWaterhyacinth weevils (Neochetina eichhorniae and N. bruchi) inhibit waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) colony development Biol. Control 15 39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Center M.P. Hill H. Cordo M.H. Julien (2002) Waterhyacinth R. Van Driesche B. Blossey M. Hoddle R. Reardon (Eds) Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Morgantown WV, USA. 41–64

    Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Center A.D. Wright (1991) ArticleTitleAge and phytochemical composition of waterhyacinth (Pontederiaceae) leaves determine their acceptability to Neochetina eichhorniae (Coleoptera: Cucurlionidae) Environ. Entomol. 20 323–334 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXmtVerurY%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Charudattan (1984) Role of Cercospora rodmanii and other pathogens in the biological and integrated controls of waterhyacinth G. Thyagarajan (Eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Water Hyacinth, Hyderabad, India, February 7–11, 1983. United Nations Environment Programme Nairobi, Kenya. 823–833 823–833

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Charudattan (2001) ArticleTitleBiological control of weeds by means of plant pathogens: significance for integrated weed management in modern agro-ecology BioControl 46 229–260

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Charudattan S.B. Linda M. Kluepfel Y.A. Osman (1985) ArticleTitleBiocontrol efficacy of Cercospora rodmanii on waterhyacinth Phytopathology 75 1263–1269 Occurrence Handle10.1094/Phyto-75-1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Charudattan B.D. Perkins R.C. Littell (1978) ArticleTitleEffects of fungi and bacteria on the decline of arthopod-damaged waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in Florida Weed Sci. 26 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Coetzee M. Byrne M. Hill (2003) ArticleTitleFailure of Eccritotarsus catarinensis, a biological control agent of waterhyacinth, to persist on pickerelweed, a non-target host in South Africa, after forced establishment Biol. Control 28 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  • A.F. Cofrancesco R.M. Stewart D.R. Sanders (1985) The impact of Neochetina eichhorniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on waterhyacinth in Louisiana. E.S. Delfosse (Eds) Proceedings VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. 19–25 August 1984 Agriculture Canada Vancouver, Canada. 525–535

    Google Scholar 

  • M.P. de Nooij A. Biere E.G.A. Linders (1992) Interaction of pests and pathogens through host disposition P.G. Ayres (Eds) Pests and Pathogens: Plant Responses to Foliar Attack. BIOS Scientific Publishers Oxford, UK 142–160

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Denoth L. Frid J.H. Myers (2002) ArticleTitleMultiple agents in biological control: improving the odds? Biol Control 24 20–30

    Google Scholar 

  • I.W. Forno M.H. Julien (2000) Success in biological control of aquatic weeds by arthropods G. Gurr S. Wratten (Eds) , Biological Control: Measures of Success. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands 159–187

    Google Scholar 

  • T.E. Freeman R. Charudattan K.E. Conway R.E. Cullen R.D. Martyn McKinney D.E. M.T. Olexa D.F. Reese (1981) Biological control of aquatic plants with pathogenic fungi. Technical Report A-81-1. US Army Chief of Engineers Washington, DC 46

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Galbraith (1987) ArticleTitleThe pathogenicity of an Australian isolate of Acremonium zonatum to waterhyacinth, and its relationship to the biological control agent, Neochetina eichhorniae Australian J. Agric. Res. 38 219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Gopal K.P. Sharma (1981) Water-Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Hindasia Delhi,India

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hammerschmidt J. Kuc (1995) Induced Resistance to Disease in Plants Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • P.E. Hatcher (1995) ArticleTitleThree-way interactions between plant pathogenic fungi, herbivorous insects and their host plants Biol. Rev. 70 639–694

    Google Scholar 

  • P.E. Hatcher (1997) Indirect interactions between insect herbivores and pathogenic fungi on leaves A.C. Gange V.K. Brown (Eds) , Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Blackwell London, UK 133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • L.R. Milbrath J.R. Nechols (2004) ArticleTitleIndividual and combined effects of Trichosirocalus horridus and Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on musk thistle Biol. Control 30 418–429

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Moran (2004) Plant mediated interactions between Neochetina s weevils and the fungal pathogen Cercospora piaropi on waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) J.M. Cullen D.T. Briese D.J. Kriticos W.M. Lonsdale L. Morain J.K. Scott (Eds) Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds.28 April–2 May 2003 CSIRO Entomology Canberra, Australia 430–435

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Muller-Scharer P.C. Scheepens M.P. Greaves (2000) ArticleTitleBiological control of weeds in European crops: recent achievements and future work Weed Res. 40 83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • T.D. Paine R.F. Raffa T.C. Harrington (1997) ArticleTitleInteractions among scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42 179–206 Occurrence Handle15012312 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjvFSlsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Sanders R.F. Theriot E.A. Theriot (1982) ArticleTitleOrganisms impacting waterhyacinth in the Panama Canal J. Aquatic Plant Mgmt 20 22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1999. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina

  • P. Syrett D.T. Briese J.H. Hoffmann (2000) Success in biological control of terrestrial weeds by arthropods G. Gurr S. Wratten (Eds) , Biological Control: Measures of Success. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands 189–230

    Google Scholar 

  • N.K. Zidack (1999) Implications of induced resistance to pathogens and herbivores for biological weed control A.A. Agrawal S. Tuzun E. Bent (Eds) Induced Plant Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul Minnesota. 371–378

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick J. Moran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moran, P.J. Leaf scarring by the weevils Neochetina eichhorniae and N. bruchi enhances infection by the fungus Cercospora piaropi on waterhyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes . Biocontrol 50, 511–524 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-004-4254-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-004-4254-y

Keywords

Navigation