, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 483–490 | Cite as

Quantitative PCR analysis used to characterize physiological changes in brain tissue of senescent sockeye salmon

  • C. S. StorerEmail author
  • T. P. Quinn
  • S. B. Roberts
Research Article


Senescence varies considerably among fishes, and understanding the evolutionary basis for this diversity has become an important area of study. For rapidly senescing species such as Pacific salmon, senescence is a complex process as these fish are initiating anorexia while migrating to natal spawning grounds, and die within days of reproduction. To better understand senescence in Pacific salmon we examined expression patterns for a suite of genes in brain tissue of pre-senescent and senescent sockeye salmon. Interestingly, a significant increase in expression of genes involved in telomere repair and immune activity was observed in senescent salmon. These data provide insight into physiological changes in salmon undergoing senescence and the factors contributing to variation in observed senescence rates among individuals and populations.


Senescence qPCR Salmon Telomerase 



The authors thank the University of Washington Alaska Salmon Program for sampling and infrastructure support, and the National Science Foundation and Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for funding. Additional support was provided by J. Seeb of the International Program for Salmon Ecological Genomics.


  1. Banks WA, Morley JE, Farr SA, Price TO, Ercal N, Vidaurre I, Schally AV (2010) Effects of a growth hormone-releasing hormone antagonist on telomerase activity, oxidative stress, longevity, and aging in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:22272–22277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardes de Jesus B, Blasco MA (2011) Aging by telomere loss can be reversed. Cell Stem Cell 8:3–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boudinot P, Massin P, Blanco M, Riffault S, Benmansour A (1999) vig-1, a new fish gene induced by the rhabdovirus glycoprotein, has a virus-induced homologue in humans and shares conserved motifs with the MoaA family. J Virol 73:1846–1852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson SM, Rich HB, Quinn TP (2004) Reproductive life-span and sources of mortality for alternative male life-history strategies in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can J Zool 82:1878–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson SM, Hilborn R, Hendry AP, Quinn TP (2007) Predation by bears drives senescence in natural populations of salmon. PLoS One. doi: 101371/journalpone0001286 Google Scholar
  6. Dang W, Zhang M, Hu YH, Sun L (2010) Differential regulation of Sciaenops ocellatus viperin expression by intracellular and extracellular bacterial pathogens. Fish Shellfish Immunol 29:264–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeVeale B, Brummel T, Seroude L (2004) Immunity and aging: the enemy within? Aging Cell 3:195–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doctor KK, Quinn TP (2009) Potential for adaptation-by-time in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka): the interactions of body size and in-stream reproductive life span with date of arrival and breeding location. Can J Zool 87:708–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans TG, Hammill E, Kaukinen K, Schulze A, Patterson D, English K, Curtis J, Miller K (2011) Transcriptomics of environmental acclimatization and survival in wild adult Pacific sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) during spawning migration. Mol Ecol 20:4472–4489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finch CE (1994) Longevity, senescence, and the genome. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Gende SM, Quinn TP, Willson MF, Heintz R, Scott TM (2004) Magnitude and fate of salmon-derived nutrients and energy in a coastal stream ecosystem. J Freshw Ecol 19:49–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greider CW (1998) Telomerase activity, cell proliferation, and cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:90–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hemann MT, Strong MA, Hao LY, Greider CW (2001) The shortest telomere, not average telomere length, is critical for cell viability and chromosome stability. Cell 107:66–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendry AP, Day T (2005) Population structure attributable to reproductive date: isolation-by-time and adaptation-by-time. Mol Ecol 14:901–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendry AP, Berg OK, Quinn TP (1999) Condition dependence and adaptation-by-time: breeding date, life history, and energy allocation within a population of salmon. Oikos 85:499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendry AP, Morbey Y, Berg O, Wenburg J (2003) Adaptive variation in senescence: reproductive life span in a wild salmon population. Proc R Soc B 271:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsu CY, Chiu YC, Hsu WL, Chan YP (2008) Age-related markers assayed at different developmental stages of the annual fish Nothobranchius rachovii. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:1267–1276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Husson F, Josse J, Le S, Mazet J (2009) FactoMineR: factor analysis and data mining with R. http://CRANR-projectorg/package=FactoMineR. Accessed 20 Jan 2013
  19. Klapper W, Kuhne K, Singh KK, Heidorn K, Parwaresch R, Krupp G (1998) Longevity of lobsters is linked to ubiquitous telomerase expression. FEBS Lett 439:143–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu C, Wang X, Feng W, Li G, Su F, Zhang S (2012) Differential expression of aging biomarkers at different life stages of the annual fish Nothobranchius guentheri. Biogerontology 13:501–510Google Scholar
  21. Maldonado TA, Jones RE, Norris DO (2002) Timing of neurodegeneration and beta-amyloid (A beta) peptide deposition in the brain of aging kokanee salmon. J Neurobiol 53:21–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGarigal K (2009) BIOSTATS: a collection of R functions written to aid in the statistical analysis of ecological data sets. http://wwwumassedu/landeco/teaching/ecodata/labs/biostatspdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2013
  23. Patnaik BK, Mahaparto N, Jena BS (1994) Ageing in fishes. Gerontology 40:113–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perrin CJ, Irvine JR (1990) A review of survey life estimates as they apply to the area-under-the-curve method for estimating the spawning escapement of Pacific salmon. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1733:1–49Google Scholar
  25. Quinn TP, Unwin MJ, Kinnison MT (2000) Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced chinook salmon populations. Evolution 54:1372–1385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Quinn TP, Wetzel L, Bishop S, Overberg K, Rogers DE (2001) Influence of breeding habitat on bear predation and age at maturity and sexual dimorphism of sockeye salmon populations. Can J Zool 79:1782–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://wwwR-projectorg. Accessed 20 Jan 2013
  28. Sarup P, Sørensen P, Loeschcke V (2011) Flies selected for longevity retain a young gene expression profile. Age 33:69–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sato H, Amagaya A, Ube M, Ono N, Kudo H (2000) Manipulating the timing of a chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) run using preserved sperm. N Pac Anadromous Fish Comm Bull 2:353–357Google Scholar
  30. Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen J (2007) Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W71–W74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao S, Fernald RD (2005) Comprehensive algorithm for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Comput Biol 12:1047–1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aquatic and Fishery SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations