Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 247–258 | Cite as

Sociability in Fruit Flies: Genetic Variation, Heritability and Plasticity

  • Andrew M. Scott
  • Ian Dworkin
  • Reuven DukasEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Sociability, defined as individuals’ propensity to participate in non-aggressive activities with conspecifics, is a fundamental feature of behavior in many animals including humans. However, we still have a limited knowledge of the mechanisms and evolutionary biology of sociability. To enhance our understanding, we developed a new protocol to quantify sociability in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster). In a series of experiments with 59 F1 hybrids derived from inbred lines, we documented, first, significant genetic variation in sociability in both males and females, with broad-sense heritabilities of 0.24 and 0.21 respectively. Second, we observed little genetic correlation in sociability between the sexes. Third, we found genetic variation in social plasticity among the hybrids, with a broad-sense heritability of ~0.24. That is, genotypes differed in the degree of sociability after experiencing the same relevant social experience. Our data pave the way for further research on the mechanisms that underlie sociability as well as its ecological and evolutionary consequences.

Keywords

Drosophila melanogaster Fruit flies Genetic variation, heritability Plasticity Reaction norms Sociability, social behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Bolker for statistical advice and S. Lodhi, A. Sivajohan, E. Etzler, I. Shams, S. Tao, and C. Baxter for assistance and three anonymous referees for comments.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2014–03999 to RD, Canada Foundation for Innovation, and Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

AM Scott, I Dworkin and R Dukas declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abrahams BS, Geschwind DH (2008) Advances in autism genetics: on the threshold of a new neurobiology. Nat Rev Genet 9:341–355. http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v9/n5/suppinfo/nrg2346_S1.html
  2. Allee WC (1931) Animal aggregations. A study in general sociology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allee WC (1942) Group organization among vertebrates. Science 95:289–293.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.95.2464.289 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson BB, Scott A, Dukas R (2016) Social behaviour and activity are decoupled in larval and adult fruit flies. Behav Ecol 27:820–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson BB, Scott A, Dukas R (2017) Indirect genetic effects on the sociability of several group members. Anim Behav 123:101–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Araya-Ajoy YG, Dingemanse NJ (2017) Repeatability, heritability, and age-dependence of seasonal plasticity in aggressiveness in a wild passerine bird. J Anim Ecol 86:227–238.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12621 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashburner M (1989) Drosophila a laboratory handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartelt RJ, Schaner AM, Jackson LL (1985) cis-vaccenyl acetate as an aggregation pheromone in Drosophila melanogaster. J Chem Ecol 11:1747–1756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartholomew NR, Burdett JM, VandenBrooks JM, Quinlan MC, Call GB (2015) Impaired climbing and flight behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster following carbon dioxide anaesthesia. Sci Rep 5:15298.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15298 http://www.nature.com/articles/srep15298#supplementary-information
  10. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed 14 June 2017
  11. Battesti M, Moreno C, Joly D, Mery F (2012) Spread of social information and dynamics of social transmission within Drosophila groups. Curr Biol 22:309–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.050 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baxter CM, Dukas R (2017) Life history of aggression: effects of age and sexual experience on male aggression towards males and females. Anim Behav 123:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolduc FV, Valente D, Mitra P, Tully T (2010) An assay for social interaction in Drosophila fragile X mutants. Fly 4:216–225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A et al (2017) Modeling zero-inflated count data with glmmtmb. bioRxiv 2017:132753Google Scholar
  15. Buss AH, Perry M (1992) The aggression questionnaire. J Pers Social Psychol 63:452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canty A, Ripley B (2017) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  17. Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW et al (2002) Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297:851–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen S, Lee AY, Bowens NM, Huber R, Kravitz EA (2002) Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5664–5668.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082102599 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Constantino JN, Todd RD (2000) Genetic structure of reciprocal social behavior. Am J Psychiatry 157:2043–2045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cote J, Clobert J (2007) Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cote J, Fogarty S, Sih A (2012) Individual sociability and choosiness between shoal types. Anim Behav 83:1469–1476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Bono M, Bargmann CI (1998) Natural variation in a neuropeptide y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans. Cell 94:679–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dingemanse NJ, Van der Plas F, Wright J, Réale D, Schrama M, Roff DA et al (2009) Individual experience and evolutionary history of predation affect expression of heritable variation in fish personality and morphology. Proc R Soc Lond B.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1555 Google Scholar
  24. Dingemanse N, Barber I, Wright J, Brommer J (2012) Quantitative genetics of behavioural reaction norms: genetic correlations between personality and behavioural plasticity vary across stickleback populations. J Evol Biol 25:485–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Donaldson ZR, Young LJ (2008) Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science 322:900–904.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158668 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Durisko Z, Kemp B, Mubasher A, Dukas R (2014) Dynamics of social interactions in fruit fly larvae. PLoS ONE 9:e95495.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.009549 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Benjamin Cummings, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Fernandez RW, Akinleye AA, Nurilov M, Feliciano O, Lollar M, Aijuri RR et al (2017) Modulation of social space by dopamine in Drosophila melanogaster but no effect on the avoidance of the Drosophila stress odorant. Biol Lett 13:20170369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fowler JH, Dawes CT, Christakis NA (2009) Model of genetic variation in human social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:1720–1724.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806746106 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression. SAGE Inc, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gallardo-Pujol D, Andrés-Pueyo A, Maydeu-Olivares A (2013) MAOA genotype, social exclusion and aggression: an experimental test of a gene–environment interaction. Genes Brain Behav 12:140–145.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00868.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gammie SC, Hasen NS, Rhodes JS, Girard I, Garland T (2003) Predatory aggression, but not maternal or intermale aggression, is associated with high voluntary wheel-running behavior in mice. Horm Behav 44:209–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0018-506X(03)00140-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gómez JM, Verdú M, González-Megías A, Méndez M (2016) The phylogenetic roots of human lethal violence. Nat Adv.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19758. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nature19758.html#supplementary-information
  35. Greenspan RJ (2004) Fly pushing: the theory and practice of Drosophila genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  36. Halekoh U, Højsgaard S (2014) A Kenward-Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models–the R package pbkrtest. J Stat Softw 59:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoffmann AA (1990) The influence of age and experience with conspecifics on territorial behavior in Drosophila-melanogaster. J Insect Behav 3:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Horton BM, Moore IT, Maney DL (2014) New insights into the hormonal and behavioural correlates of polymorphism in white-throated sparrows, Zonotrichia albicollis. Anim Behav 93:207–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.04.015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195–204PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson DD, Kays R, Blackwell PG, Macdonald DW (2002) Does the resource dispersion hypothesis explain group living? Trends Ecol Evol 17:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2 edn. Addison-Wesley, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  42. Levine JD, Funes P, Dowse HB, Hall JC (2002) Resetting the circadian clock by social experience in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 298:2010–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lihoreau M, Clarke IM, Buhl J, Sumpter DJT, Simpson SJ (2016) Collective selection of food patches in Drosophila. J Exp Biol 219:668–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lihoreau M, Charleston MA, Senior AM, Clissold FJ, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ et al (2017) Collective foraging in spatially complex nutritional environments. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin C-C, Prokop-Prigge KA, Preti G, Potter CJ (2015) Food odors trigger Drosophila males to deposit a pheromone that guides aggregation and female oviposition decisions. eLife 4:e08688.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08688 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Lukas D, Clutton-Brock TH (2013) The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science 341:526–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Macdonald DW (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mackay TFC, Richards S, Stone EA, Barbadilla A, Ayroles JF, Zhu D et al (2012) The Drosophila melanogaster genetic reference panel. Nature 482:173–178. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7384/abs/nature10811.html#supplementary-information
  49. Mason DA, Frick PJ (1994) The heritability of antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 16:301–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moy SS, Nadler J (2008) Advances in behavioral genetics: mouse models of autism. Mol Psychiatry 13:4–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nussey DH, Postma E, Gienapp P, Visser ME (2005) Selection on heritable phenotypic plasticity in a wild bird population. Science 310:304–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Pasquaretta C, Battesti M, Klenschi E, Bousquet CAH, Sueur C, Mery F (2016) How social network structure affects decision-making in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B 283:20152954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pearce E, Wlodarski R, Machin A, Dunbar RIM (2017) Variation in the β-endorphin, oxytocin, and dopamine receptor genes is associated with different dimensions of human sociality. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:5300–5305.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700712114 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Penn JKM, Zito MF, Kravitz EA (2010) A single social defeat reduces aggression in a highly aggressive strain of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12682–12686.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007016107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Philippe A-S, Jeanson R, Pasquaretta C, Rebaudo F, Sueur C, Mery F (2016) Genetic variation in aggregation behaviour and interacting phenotypes in Drosophila. Proc R Soc Lond B 283:20152967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. R-Core-Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 14 June 2017
  57. Rettew DC, Rebollo-Mesa I, Hudziak JJ, Willemsen G, Boomsma DI (2008) Non-additive and additive genetic effects on extraversion in 3314 Dutch adolescent twins and their parents. Behav Genet 38:223–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-008-9192-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Rohde PD, Gaertner B, Wards K, Sørensen P, Mackay TF (2017) Genomic analysis of genotype by social environment interaction for Drosophila aggressive behavior. Genetics.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.200642 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Roles AJ, Rutter MT, Dworkin I, Fenster CB, Conner JK (2016) Field measurements of genotype by environment interaction for fitness caused by spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 70:1039–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rushton JP, Fulker DW, Neale MC, Nias DK, Eysenck HJ (1986) Altruism and aggression: the heritability of individual differences. J Pers Soc Psychol 50:1192–1198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Saltz JB (2011) Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene–environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 65:2325–2334.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01295.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Saltz JB, Foley BR (2011) Natural genetic variation in social niche construction: social effects of aggression drive disruptive sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat 177:645–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sandnabba NK (1996) Selective breeding for isolation-induced intermale aggression in mice: associated responses and environmental influences. Behav Genet 26:477–488.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359752 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sarin S, Dukas R (2009) Social learning about egg laying substrates in fruit flies. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:4323–4328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scheiner SM, Lyman RF (1989) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity I. Heritability. J Evol Biol 2:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schneider J, Dickinson MH, Levine JD (2012) Social structures depend on innate determinants and chemosensory processing in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:17174–17179.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121252109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Scourfield J, Martin N, Lewis G, McGuffin P (1999) Heritability of social cognitive skills in children and adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 175:559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Shorter J, Couch C, Huang W, Carbone MA, Peiffer J, Anholt RRH et al (2015) Genetic architecture of natural variation in Drosophila melanogaster aggressive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:E3555–E3563.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510104112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Silverman JL, Yang M, Lord C, Crawley JN (2010) Behavioural phenotyping assays for mouse models of autism. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:490–502. http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v11/n7/suppinfo/nrn2851_S1.html
  70. Simon AF, Chou MT, Salazar ED, Nicholson T, Saini N, Metchev S et al (2012) A simple assay to study social behavior in Drosophila: measurement of social space within a group. Genes Brain Behav 11:243–252.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00740.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Skuse DH, Lori A, Cubells JF, Lee I, Conneely KN, Puura K et al (2014) Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:1987–1992.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302985111 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Stirling D, Réale D, Roff D (2002) Selection, structure and the heritability of behaviour. J Evol Biol 15:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thomas JW, Cáceres M, Lowman JJ, Morehouse CB, Short ME, Baldwin EL et al (2008) The chromosomal polymorphism linked to variation in social behavior in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) is a complex rearrangement and suppressor of recombination. Genetics 179:1455CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Thorneycroft H (1966) Chromosomal polymorphism in the white-throated sparrow, Zonotrichia albicollis (Gmelin). Science 154:1571–1572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Thorneycroft HB (1975) A cytogenetic study of the white-throated sparrow, Zonotrichia albicollis (gmelin). Evolution 29:611–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Tinette S, Zhang L, Robichon A (2004) Cooperation between Drosophila flies in searching behavior. Genes Brain Behav 3:39–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tuttle AH, Tansley S, Dossett K, Tohyama S, Khoutorsky A, Maldonado-Bouchard S et al (2017) Social propinquity in rodents as measured by tube cooccupancy differs between inbred and outbred genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:5515–5520.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703477114 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Ueda A, Kidokoro Y (2002) Aggressive behaviours of female Drosophila melanogaster are influenced by their social experience and food resources. Physiol Entomol 27:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Valzelli L (1973) The “isolation syndrome” in mice. Psychopharmacologia 31:305–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00421275 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. van den Berg SM, de Moor MHM, Verweij KJH, Krueger RF, Luciano M, Arias Vasquez A et al (2016) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for extraversion: findings from the genetics of personality consortium. Behav Genet 46:170–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9735-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Viken RJ, Rose RJ, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M (1994) A developmental genetic analysis of adult personality: extraversion and neuroticism from 18 to 59 years of age. J Pers Soc Psychol 66:722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Walum H, Westberg L, Henningsson S, Neiderhiser JM, Reiss D, Igl W et al (2008) Genetic variation in the vasopressin receptor 1a gene (AVPR1A) associates with pair-bonding behavior in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:14153–14156.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803081105 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang L, Dankert H, Perona P, Anderson DJ (2008) A common genetic target for environmental and heritable influences on aggressiveness in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5657–5663CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Ward A, Webster M (2016) Sociality: the behaviour of group living animals. Springer, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wertheim B, Allemand R, Vet LEM, Dicke M (2006) Effects of aggregation pheromone on individual behaviour and food web interactions: a field study on Drosophila. Ecol Entomol 31:216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  87. Yuan Q, Song Y, Yang C-H, Jan LY, Jan YN (2014) Female contact modulates male aggression via a sexually dimorphic GABAergic circuit in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 17:81–88.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3581 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhang B, Freeman MR, Waddell S (2010) Drosophila neurobiology: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  89. Zwarts L, Vanden Broeck L, Cappuyns E, Ayroles JF, Magwire MM, Vulsteke V et al (2015) The genetic basis of natural variation in mushroom body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun 6:10115.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10115 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Behaviour Group, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & BehaviourMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations