A Test-Replicate Approach to Candidate Gene Research on Addiction and Externalizing Disorders: A Collaboration Across Five Longitudinal Studies
This study presents results from a collaboration across five longitudinal studies seeking to test and replicate models of gene–environment interplay in the development of substance use and externalizing disorders (SUDs, EXT). We describe an overview of our conceptual models, plan for gene–environment interplay analyses, and present main effects results evaluating six candidate genes potentially relevant to SUDs and EXT (MAOA, 5-HTTLPR, COMT, DRD2, DAT1, and DRD4). All samples included rich longitudinal and phenotypic measurements from childhood/adolescence (ages 5–13) through early adulthood (ages 25–33); sample sizes ranged from 3487 in the test sample, to ~600–1000 in the replication samples. Phenotypes included lifetime symptom counts of SUDs (nicotine, alcohol and cannabis), adult antisocial behavior, and an aggregate externalizing disorder composite. Covariates included the first 10 ancestral principal components computed using all autosomal markers in subjects across the data sets, and age at the most recent assessment. Sex, ancestry, and exposure effects were thoroughly evaluated. After correcting for multiple testing, only one significant main effect was found in the test sample, but it was not replicated. Implications for subsequent gene–environment interplay analyses are discussed.
KeywordsAddiction Alcohol Candidate gene studies Cannabis Externalizing disorders Nicotine Replication studies Substance use disorders
Authors Ken C. Winters and Susanne Lee would like to thank Dr.’s George Realmuto and Irv Gottesman for their help consulting with the genetic portion of their study.
This research was supported by Grants DA024417, DA05147, DA13240, DA012995, DA024411-01-06, DA009679, DA036216, DA008093-15-18, and DA037280 (to S. W.) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Grant AA09367, and Grant AA11886 from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The first author (D. R. S.) was also supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1006129. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the aforementioned funding agencies.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Diana R. Samek, Jennifer Bailey, Karl G. Hill, Sylia Wilson, Susanne Lee, Margaret A. Keyes, Marina Epstein, Andrew Smolen, Michael Miller, Ken C. Winters, J. David Hawkins, Richard F. Catalano, William G. Iacono, and Matt McGue declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- APA (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Bailey JA, Hill KG, Meacham MC, Young SE, Hawkins JD (2011) Strategies for characterizing complex phenotypes and environments: general and specific family environmental predictors of young adult tobacco dependence, alcohol use disorder, and co-occurring problems. Drug Alcohol Depend 118(2–3):444–451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bailey JA, Samek DR, Keyes MA, Hill KG, Hicks BM, McGue M, Iacono WG, Epstein M, Catalano RF, Haggerty KP, Hawkins JD (2014) General and substance-specific predictors of young adult nicotine dependence, alcohol use disorder, and problem behavior: replication in two samples. Drug Alcohol Depend 138:161–168CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2005) Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2. Biostat, EnglewoodGoogle Scholar
- Brookes K, Xu X, Chen W, Zhou K, Neale B, Lowe N, Anney R, Franke B, Gill M, Ebstein R, Buitelaar J, Sham P, Campbell D, Knight J, Andreou P, Altink M, Arnold R, Boer F, Buschgens C, Butler L, Christiansen H, Feldman L, Fleischman K, Fliers E, Howe-Forbes R, Goldfarb A, Heise A, Gabriels I, Korn-Lubetzki I, Johansson L, Marco R, Medad S, Minderaa R, Mulas F, Muller U, Mulligan A, Rabin K, Rommelse N, Sethna V, Sorohan J, Uebel H, Psychogiou L, Weeks A, Barrett R, Craig I, Banaschewski T, Sonuga-Barke EJS, Eisenberg J, Kuntsi J, Manor I, McGuffin P, Miranda A, D Oades R, Plomin R, Roeyers H, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Steinhausen HC, Taylor E, Thompson M, Faraone SV, Asherson P (2006) The analysis of 51 genes in DSM-IV combined type Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: association signals in DRD4, DAT1 and 16 other genes (vol 11, pg 934, 2006). Mol Psychiatry 11(12):1139Google Scholar
- Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Cannon M, McClay J, Murray R, Harrington H, Taylor A, Arseneault L, Williams B, Braithwaite A, Poulton R, Craig IW (2005) Moderation of the effect of adolescent-onset cannabis use on adult psychosis by a functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene: longitudinal evidence of a gene × environment interaction. Biol Psychiatry 57(10):1117–1127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chabris CF, Hebert BM, Benjamin DJ, Beauchamp J, Cesarini D, van der Loos M, Johannesson M, Magnusson PK, Lichtenstein P, Atwood CS, Freese J, Hauser TS, Hauser RM, Christakis N, Laibson D (2012) Most reported genetic associations with general intelligence are probably false positives. Psychol Sci 23(11):1314–1323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawurence Earlbaum Associates, Hillside, NJGoogle Scholar
- Estrada G, Fatjo-Vilas M, Munoz MJ, Pulido G, Minano MJ, Toledo E, Illa JM, Martin M, Miralles ML, Miret S, Campanera S, Bernabeu C, Navarro ME, Fananas L (2011) Cannabis use and age at onset of psychosis: further evidence of interaction with COMT Val158Met polymorphism. Acta Psychiatr Scand 123(6):485–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gelernter J, Kranzler HR, Sherva R, Almasy L, Herman AI, Koesterer R, Zhao H, Farrer LA (2015) Genome-Wide Association study of nicotine dependence in American populations: identification of novel risk loci in both African-Americans and European-Americans. Biol Psychiatry 77(5):493–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkins JD, Smith BH, Hill KG, Kosterman R, Catalano RF, Abbott RD (2003) Understanding and preventing crime and violence: findings from the Seattle SOcial Development Project. In: Thornberry TP, Krohn MD (eds) Taking stock of juvenile delinquency: an overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 255–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2012) Mplus User’s Guide, 7th edition. Muthén and Muthén Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
- Reif A, Weber H, Domschke K, Klauke B, Baumann C, Jacob CP, Strohle A, Gerlach AL, Alpers GW, Pauli P, Hamm A, Kircher T, Arolt V, Wittchen HU, Binder EB, Erhardt A, Deckert J (2012) Meta-analysis argues for a female-specific role of MAOA-uVNTR in panic disorder in four European populations. Am J Med Genet Part B 159(7):786–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reif A, Richter J, Straube B, Hofler M, Lueken U, Gloster AT, Weber H, Domschke K, Fehm L, Strohle A, Jansen A, Gerlach A, Pyka M, Reinhardt I, Konrad C, Wittmann A, Pfleiderer B, Alpers GW, Pauli P, Lang T, Arolt V, Wittchen HU, Hamm A, Kircher T, Deckert J (2014) MAOA and mechanisms of panic disorder revisited: from bench to molecular psychotherapy. Mol Psychiatry 19(1):122–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Williams JBW, Spitzer RL (1981) NIMH diagnostic interview schedule: version III. National Institute of Mental Health, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
- Robins LN, Wing J, Wittchen HU, Helzer JE, Babor TF, Burke J, Farmer A, Jablenski A, Pickens R, Regier DA et al (1988) The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45(12):1069–1077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samek DR, Hicks BM, Keyes MA, McGue M, Iacono WG (2016) Antisocial peer affiliation and externalizing disorders: evidence for gene × environment × development interaction. Dev Psychopathol. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000109
- Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M (1987) Structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- WHO (1990) Composite International Diagnostic Interview, Version 1.0. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Winters KC (2015) Minnesota drug abuse and ADHD study. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
- Winters KC, Henly GA (1993) Adolescent diagnostic interview schedule and manual. Western Psychological Services, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Yang B, Chan RC, Jing J, Li T, Sham P, Chen RY (2007) A meta-analysis of association studies between the 10-repeat allele of a VNTR polymorphism in the 3’-UTR of dopamine transporter gene and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 144B(4):541–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Hu L, Li X, Zhang J, Chen B (2014) The DRD2 rs1800497 polymorphism increase the risk of mood disorder: evidence from an update meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 15:871–877Google Scholar