Cohort Effects in the Genetic Influence on Smoking
- 567 Downloads
We examine the hypothesis that the heritability of smoking has varied over the course of recent history as a function of associated changes in the composition of the smoking and non-smoking populations. Classical twin-based heritability analysis has suggested that genetic basis of smoking has increased as the information about the harms of tobacco has become more prevalent—particularly after the issuance of the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report. In the present paper we deploy alternative methods to test this claim. We use data from the Health and Retirement Study to estimate cohort differences in the genetic influence on smoking using both genomic-relatedness-matrix restricted maximum likelihood and a modified DeFries–Fulker approach. We perform a similar exercise deploying a polygenic score for smoking using results generated by the Tobacco and Genetics consortium. The results support earlier claims that the genetic influence in smoking behavior has increased over time. Emphasizing historical periods and birth cohorts as environmental factors has benefits over existing GxE research. Our results provide additional support for the idea that anti-smoking policies of the 1980s may not be as effective because of the increasingly important role of genotype as a determinant of smoking status.
KeywordsSmoking GCTA GREML Genome-wide Polygenic score
This study was funded by NIH/NICHD R21 HD078031. Additional support came from R24 HD066613 which supports the CU Population Center. The Health and Retirement Study is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (Grant Number NIA U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2008) Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57(45):1226Google Scholar
- Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ (2014) Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.4803
- Clair PS, Bugliari D, Campbell N, Chien S, Hayden O, Hurd M, et al (2011) RAND HRS Data Documentation, Version LGoogle Scholar
- Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995) Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav, 80–94Google Scholar
- Lumley T (2004) Analysis of complex survey samples. J Stat Softw 9(1):1–19Google Scholar
- Rehkopf DH (2014) Understanding the role of social and economic factors in GCTA heritability estimates. Presented at the 5th Annual IGSS Conference. Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
- Vrieze SI, McGue M, Miller MB, Hicks BM, Iacono WG (2013) Three mutually informative ways to understand the genetic relationships among behavioral disinhibition, alcohol use, drug use, nicotine use/dependence, and their co-occurrence: twin biometry, GCTA, and genome-wide scoring. Behav Genet 43(2):97–107PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar