Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 314–325 | Cite as

Child Care, Socio-economic Status and Problem Behavior: A Study of Gene–Environment Interaction in Young Dutch Twins

  • Christel M. MiddeldorpEmail author
  • Diane J. Lamb
  • Jacqueline M. Vink
  • Meike Bartels
  • Catharina E. M. van Beijsterveldt
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
Original Research

Abstract

The influences of formal child care before age 4 on behavioral problems at 3, 5, and 7 years of age were assessed in 18,932 Dutch twins (3,878 attended formal child care). The effect of formal child care was studied on the average level of problem behavior and as moderator of genetic and non-genetic influences, while taking into account effects of sex and parental socio-economic status (SES). There was a small association between attending formal child care and higher externalizing problems, especially when SES was low. Heritability was lower for formal child care and in lower SES conditions. These effects were largest at age 7 and for externalizing problems. In 7 year-old boys and girls, the difference in heritability between the formal child care group of low SES and the home care group of high SES was 30 % for externalizing and ~20 % for internalizing problems. The decrease in heritability was explained by a larger influence of the environment, rather than by a decrease in genetic variance. These results support a bioecological model in which heritability is lower in circumstances associated with more problem behavior.

Keywords

Child care Internalizing problem behavior Externalizing problem behavior Gene–environment interaction Twins Genetics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by ZonMw, grant number 920-03-268, and “Spinozapremie” (NWO/SPI 56-464-14192); “Twin-family database for behavior genetics and genomics studies” (NWO 480-04-004); Genetics of Mental Illness: European Research Council (ERC-230374, PI Boomsma); Genetic influences on stability and change in psychopathology from childhood to young adulthood (NWO/ZonMW 91210020), NWO (VENI 916-76-125; PI Middeldorp) and ERC Starting Grant 284167 (PI Vink).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

The data collection was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Centre.

References

  1. Achenbach TM (1991) Manual of the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Achenbach TM (1992) Manual of the child behavior checklist/2–3 and 1992 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson BE (1989) Effects of public day-care: a longitudinal study. Child Dev 60:857–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson BE (1992) Effects of day-care on cognitive and socioemotional competence of thirteen-year-old Swedish schoolchildren. Child Dev 63:20–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Averdijk M, Besemer S, Eisner M, Bijleveld C, Ribeaud D (2011) The relationship between quantity, type, and timing of external childcare and child problem behaviour in Switzerland. Eur J Dev Psychol 8:637–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartels M, van den Oord EJ, Hudziak JJ, Rietveld MJ, van Beijsterveldt CE, Boomsma DI (2004) Genetic and environmental mechanisms underlying stability and change in problem behaviors at ages 3, 7, 10, and 12. Dev Psychol 40:852–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartels M, van Beijsterveldt CE, Derks EM, Stroet TM, Polderman TJ, Hudziak JJ et al (2007) Young Netherlands Twin Register (Y-NTR): a longitudinal multiple informant study of problem behavior. Twin Res Hum Genet 10:3–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bekkhus M, Rutter M, Maughan B, Borge AIH (2011) The effects of group daycare in the context of paid maternal leave and high-quality provision. Eur J Dev Psychol 8:681–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boomsma D, Martin NG (2002) Gene–environment interactions. In: D’haenen H, den Boer JA, Willner P (eds) Biological psychiatry. Wiley, New York, pp 181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ (1994) Nature–nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective—a bioecological model. Psychol Rev 101:568–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Button TM, Scourfield J, Martin N, Purcell S, McGuffin P (2005) Family dysfunction interacts with genes in the causation of antisocial symptoms. Behav Genet 35:115–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Button TM, Lau JY, Maughan B, Eley TC (2008) Parental punitive discipline, negative life events and gene–environment interplay in the development of externalizing behavior. Psychol Med 38:29–39PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crockenberg SC, Leerkes EM (2005) Infant temperament moderates associations between childcare type and quantity and externalizing and internalizing behaviors at years. Infant Behav Dev 28:20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crosby DA, Dowsett CJ, Gennetian LA, Huston AC (2010) A tale of two methods: comparing regression and instrumental variables estimates of the effects of preschool child care type on the subsequent externalizing behavior of children in low-income families. Dev Psychol 46:1030–1048PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Kruif REL, Riksen-Walraven JM, Deynoot-Schaub MJJM, Helmerhorst KOW, Tavecchio LWC, Fukkink RG (2009) Pedagogische kwaliteit van de opvang voor 0- tot 4-jarigen in Nederlandse kinderdagverblijven in 2008 [Educational quality of day care for 0 till 4 year olds in Dutch child care centers] Nederlands Consortium Kinderopvang OnderzoekGoogle Scholar
  16. Dettling AC, Parker SW, Lane S, Sebanc A, Gunnar MR (2000) Quality of care and temperament determine changes in cortisol concentrations over the day for young children in childcare. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25:819–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deynoot-Schaub MJJM, Riksen-Walraven JM (2005) Child care under pressure: the quality of Dutch Centers in 1995 and in 2001. J Genet Psychol 166:280–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eaves LJ (1984) The resolution of genotype × environment interaction in segregation analysis of nuclear families. Genet Epidemiol 1:215–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groen-Blokhuis MM, Middeldorp CM, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Boomsma DI (2011) Crying without a cause and being easily upset in two-year-olds: heritability and predictive power of behavioral problems. Twin Res Hum Genet 14:393–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hicks BM, DiRago AC, Iacono WG, McGue M (2009a) Gene–environment interplay in internalizing disorders: consistent findings across six environmental risk factors. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:1309–1317PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hicks BM, South SC, DiRago AC, Iacono WG, McGue M (2009b) Environmental adversity and increasing genetic risk for externalizing disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66:640–648PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaffee SR, Van Hulle C, Rodgers JL (2011) Effects of nonmaternal care in the first 3 years on Children’s Academic Skills and behavioral functioning in childhood and early adolescence: a sibling comparison study. Child Dev 82:1076–1091PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kendler KS (2001) Twin studies of psychiatric illness: an update. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:1005–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lau JY, Eley TC (2008) Disentangling gene–environment correlations and interactions on adolescent depressive symptoms. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49:142–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau JYF, Gregory AM, Goldwin MA, Pine DS, Eley TC (2007) Assessing gene–environment interactions on anxiety symptom subtypes across childhood and adolescence. Dev Psychopathol 19:1129–1146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2006) Mx: statistical modeling, 6th edn. Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  27. NICHD Early Child Care Res Network (1998) Early child care and self-control, compliance and problem behavior at 24 and 36 months. Child Dev 69:1145–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. NICHD Early Child Care Res Network (2004) Type of child care and children’s development at 54 months. Early Child Res Q 19:203–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips DA, Lowenstein AE (2011) Early care, education, and child development. Annu Rev Psychol 62:483–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pluess M, Belsky J (2009) Differential susceptibility to rearing experience: the case of. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:396–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pluess M, Belsky J (2010) Differential susceptibility to parenting and quality child care. Dev Psychol 46:379–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Purcell S (2002) Variance components models for gene–environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Res 5:554–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramanathan S, Balasubramanian N, Krishnadas R (2013) Macroeconomic environment during infancy as a possible risk factor for adolescent behavioral problems. JAMA Psychiatry 70:218–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rende R, Plomin R (1992) Diathesis–stress models of psychopathology: a quantitative genetic perspective. Appl Prev Psychol 1:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rice F, Harold GT, Shelton KH, Thapar A (2006) Family conflict interacts with genetic liability in predicting childhood and adolescent depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:841–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saudino KJ (2005) Behavioral genetics and child temperament. J Dev Behav Pediatr 26:214–223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saudino KJ (2009) The development of temperament from a behavioral genetics perspective. Adv Child Dev Behav 37:201–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scarr S, McCartney K (1983) How people make their own environments—a theory of genotype–environment effects. Child Dev 54:424–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Silberg J, Rutter M, Neale M, Eaves L (2001) Genetic moderation of environmental risk for depression and anxiety in adolescent girls. Br J Psychiatry 179:116–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spivack G, Spotts J (1966) The Devereux Child Behavior (DCB) Rating Scale. Devon, A: The Devereux FoundationGoogle Scholar
  41. Tucker-Drob EM, Harden KP (2012) Gene–preschool interaction on the development of early externalizing problems. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54:77–85PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tuvblad C, Grann M, Lichtenstein P (2006) Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: gene–environment interaction. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:734–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Beijsterveldt CEM, Verhulst FC, Molenaar PCM, Boomsma DI (2004) The genetic basis of problem behavior in 5-year-old Dutch twin pairs. Behav Genet 34:229–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Beijsterveldt TCEM, Hudziak JJ, Boomsma DI (2005) Short-and long-term effects of child care on problem behaviors in a Dutch sample of twins. Twin Res Hum Genet 8:250–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Beijsterveldt CE, Groen-Blokhuis M, Hottenga JJ, Franic S, Hudziak JJ, Lamb D et al (2013) The Young Netherlands Twin Register (YNTR): longitudinal twin and family studies in over 70,000 children. Twin Res Hum Genet 16:252–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van der Sluis S, Posthuma D, Dolan CV (2012) A note on false positives and power in G × E modelling of twin data. Behav Genet 42:170–186PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van IJzendoorn MH, Tavecchio LWC, Riksen-Walraven JM (2004) De kwaliteit van de Nederlandse kinderopvang [Quality of Dutch child care]. Boom, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandell DL, Belsky J, Burchinal M, Steinberg L, Vandergrift N (2010) Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Child Dev 81:737–756PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vendlinski MK, Lemery-Chalfant K, Essex MJ, Goldsmith HH (2011) Genetic risk by experience interaction for childhood internalizing problems: converging evidence across multiple methods. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:607–618PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vermeer HJ, van IJzendoorn MH, de Kruif REL, Fukkink RG, Tavecchio LWC, Riksen-Walraven JM et al (2008) Child care in the Netherlands: trends in quality over the years 1995–2005. J Gen Psychol 169:360–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zachrisson HD, Dearing E, Lekhal R, Toppelberg CO (2013) Little evidence that time in child care causes externalizing problems during early childhood in Norway. Child Dev 84:1152–1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christel M. Middeldorp
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Diane J. Lamb
    • 1
  • Jacqueline M. Vink
    • 1
    • 3
  • Meike Bartels
    • 1
    • 4
  • Catharina E. M. van Beijsterveldt
    • 1
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Netherlands Twin Register, Department Biological PsychologyVU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryGGZ inGeest/VU Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (NCA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care ResearchVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations