Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 337–346 | Cite as

Moderating the Covariance Between Family Member’s Substance Use Behavior

  • Brad VerhulstEmail author
  • Lindon J. Eaves
  • Michael C. Neale
Original Research

Abstract

Twin and family studies implicitly assume that the covariation between family members remains constant across differences in age between the members of the family. However, age-specificity in gene expression for shared environmental factors could generate higher correlations between family members who are more similar in age. Cohort effects (cohort × genotype or cohort × common environment) could have the same effects, and both potentially reduce effect sizes estimated in genome-wide association studies where the subjects are heterogeneous in age. In this paper we describe a model in which the covariance between twins and non-twin siblings is moderated as a function of age difference. We describe the details of the model and simulate data using a variety of different parameter values to demonstrate that model fitting returns unbiased parameter estimates. Power analyses are then conducted to estimate the sample sizes required to detect the effects of moderation in a design of twins and siblings. Finally, the model is applied to data on cigarette smoking. We find that (1) the model effectively recovers the simulated parameters, (2) the power is relatively low and therefore requires large sample sizes before small to moderate effect sizes can be found reliably, and (3) the genetic covariance between siblings for smoking behavior decays very rapidly. Result 3 implies that, e.g., genome-wide studies of smoking behavior that use individuals assessed at different ages, or belonging to different birth-year cohorts may have had substantially reduced power to detect effects of genotype on cigarette use. It also implies that significant special twin environmental effects can be explained by age-moderation in some cases. This effect likely contributes to the missing heritability paradox.

Keywords

Age-difference moderation Twin-sibling design Missing heritability Gene-by-age interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health (National Institute for Drug Abuse: 5R25DA026119 and R37DA018673).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to report.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. Boomsma D, Busjahn A, Peltonen L (2002) Classical twin studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 3(11):872–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BrainSpan: Atlas of the Developing Human Brain (2011) Funded by ARRA awards 1RC2MH089921-01, 1RC2MH090047-01, and 1RC2MH089929-01. 2011. http://developinghumanbrain.org
  3. Briley DA, Tucker-Drob EM (2013) Explaining the increasing heritability of cognitive ability across development: a meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychol Sci 24(9):1704–1713Google Scholar
  4. Cattell RB (1963) The interaction of heredity and environmental influences. Br J Stat Psychol 16:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conley D, Rauscher E, Dawes C, Magnusson PKE, Siegal ML (2013) Heritability and the equal environments assumption: evidence from multiple samples of misclassified twins. Behav Genet 43(5):415–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Distel MA, Vink JM, Bartels M, van Beijsterveldt CE, Neale MC, Boomsma DI (2011) Age moderates non-genetic influences on the initiation of cannabis use: a twin-sibling study in Dutch adolescents and young adults. Addiction 106(9):1658–1666PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eaves LJ, Last KA, Young PA, Martin NG (1978) Model fitting approaches to the analysis of human behavior. Heredity 41:249–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eaves LJ, Long J, Heath AC (1986) A theory of developmental change in quantitative phenotypes applied to cognitive development. Behav Genet 16(1):143–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eaves LJ, Heath AC, Martin NG, Maes HH, Neale MC, Kendler KS, Kirk KS, Corey LA (1999) Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Res 2:62–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Longman Scientific & Technical, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinb 52:399–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris KM (2013) The Add Health Study: design and accomplishments. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/guides/DesignPaperWIIV.pdf. (Accessed 13 Dec 2013)
  13. Hewitt JK, Eaves LJ, Neale MC, Meyer JM (1988) Resolving causes of developmental continuity or “tracking”. I. Longitudinal twin studies during growth. Behav Genet 18(2):133–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopper JL, Culross P (1983) Covariation between family members as a function of cohabitation history. Behav Genet 13:459–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopper JL, Mathews JD (1982) Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis. Ann Hum Genet 46(4):1469–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laceulle OM, Ormel J, Aggen SH, Neale MC, Kendler KS (2013) Genetic and environmental influences on the longitudinal structure of neuroticism: a trait-state approach. Psychol Sci 24(9):1780–1790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maes HH, Neale MC, Martin NG, Heath AC, Eaves LJ (1999) Religious attendance and frequency of alcohol use: same genes or same environments: a bivariate extended twin kinship model. Twin Res 2:169–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maher B (2008) Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature 456:18–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin NG, Eaves LJ (1977) The genetical analysis of covariance structure. Heredity 38:79–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martino D, Loke YJ, Gordon L, Ollikainen M, Cruickshank MN, Saffery R, Craig JM (2013) Longitudinal, genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in twins from birth to 18 months of age reveals rapid epigenetic change in early life and pair-specific effects of discordance. Genome Biol 14(5):42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nance WE, Bodurtha J, Eaves LJ, Hewitt J, Maes H, Segrest J, Meyer J, Neale M, Schieken R (1998) Models for the longitudinal genetic analysis of same-age twins: application to HDL cholesterol. Twin Res 1(1):3–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neale MC, Fulker DW (1984) A bivariate path analysis of fear data on twins and their parents. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:273–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Neiderhiser JM, Reiss D, Hetherington EM (2007) The nonshared environment in adolescent development (NEAD) project: a longitudinal family study of twins and siblings from adolescence to young adulthood. Twin Res Hum Gene 10(1):74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearson K, Lee A (1903) On the laws of inheritance in man. Biometrika 2:357–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plomin R, Daniels D (2011) Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Int J Epidemiol 40(3):563–582PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Posthuma D, Boomsma DI (2000) A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs. Behav Genet 30(2):147–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmitt JE, Lenroot RK, Wallace GL, Ordaz S, Taylor KN, Kabani N, Greenstein D, Lerch JP, Kendler KS, Neale MC, Giedd JN (2008) Identification of genetically mediated cortical networks: a multivariate study of pediatric twins and siblings. Cereb Cortex 18(8):1737–1747PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tambs K, Eaves LJ, Moum T, Holmen J, Neale MC, Naess S, Lund-Larsen PG (1993) Age-specific genetic effects for blood pressure. Hypertension 22:789–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Truett KR, Eaves LJ, Walters EE, Heath AC, Hewitt JK, Meyer J, Silberg J, Neale MC, Martin NG, Kendler KS (1994) A model system for analysis of family resemblance in extended kinships of twins. Behav Genet 24:35–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Beijsterveldt CEM, Groen-Blokhuis M, Hottenga JJ, Franic S, Hudziak JJ, Lamb D, de Huppertz C, Zeeuw E, Nivard M, Schutte N, Swagerman S, Glasner T, van Fulpen M, Brouwer C, Stroet T, Nowotny D, Ehli EA, Davies GE, Scheet P, Orlebeke JF, Kan K-J, Smit D, Dolan CV, Middeldorp CM, de Geus EJC, Bartels M, Boomsma DI (2013) The Young Netherlands Twin Register (YNTR): longitudinal twin and family studies in over 70,000 children. Twin Res Hum Genet 16(1):252–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brad Verhulst
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lindon J. Eaves
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael C. Neale
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral GeneticsVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (VCU)RichmondUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human and Molecular GeneticsVirginia Commonwealth University School of MedicineRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations