Skip to main content
Log in

No Apparent Indirect Genetic Benefits to Female Red Flour Beetles Preferring Males with Intense Copulatory Courtship

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether females gain indirect genetic benefits through mate choice is a controversial issue since this requires additive genetic variance in the preferred male traits. Condition dependence could maintain the necessary genetic variance by linking the expression of male traits to the supposedly large number of genes affecting condition. Copulating males of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum rub their legs along the female elytra. Females favor males with vigorous rubbing through cryptic female choice. We measured the repeatability and heritability of this behavior and assessed its potential use as indicator of viability and condition. We found genetic variance in larval to adult survival and in the rate of leg rubbing in males. However, the rate of leg rubbing was not related to offspring survival or condition dependent. The genetic variance in leg rubbing was mostly non-additive with very low narrow sense heritability. Therefore, we failed to document any indirect genetic benefits to choosy females through viability of their offspring or attractiveness of their sons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G., Thornhill R. (1998). Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genet. Res. 71:193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker T. C. M. (1999). The study of intersexual selection using quantitative genetics. Behaviour 136:1237–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi G., Keller L. (2001). Female polyandry affects their sons’ reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. J. Evol. Biol. 14:186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorksten T., David P., Pomiankowski A., Fowler K. (2000). Fluctuating asymmetry of sexual and nonsexual traits in stalk-eyed flies: a poor indicator of developmental stress and genetic quality. J. Evol. Biol. 13:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch Qazi M. C. (2003). A potential mechanism for cryptic female choice in a flour beetle. J. Evol. Biol. 16:170–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borgia G. (1979). Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum M. S., Blum N. A. (eds). Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. Academic, New York, pp. 19–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A. (1999). Male copulatory sensory stimulation induces female ejection of rival sperm in a damselfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:779–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard W. G. (1996). Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson M., Arnqvist G. (2000). Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:559–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D. S. (1973). Replicated selection for body weight in mice. Genet. Res. 22:291–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D. S., Mackay T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edn Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A. (1990). Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J. Theor. Biol. 144:473–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houle D., Kondrashov A. S. (2002). Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M., Ryan M.J. (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho J. S., Simmons L. W., Tomkins J. L. (2001). Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410:684–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lessells C. M., Boag P. T. (1987). Unrepeatable repeatabilities: A common mistake. Auk 104:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch P. D., Proulx S., Rowe L., Day T. (2003). Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5:867–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller A. P., Alatalo R. V. (1999). Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottoni E.B. (2000). EthoLog 2.2: a tool for the transcription and timing of behavior observation sessions. Behav. Res. Meth. Ins. C. 32:446–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pai A., Yan G.Y. (2002). Polyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pai A., Yan G. (2003). Effects of tapeworm infection on male reproductive success and mating vigor in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. J. Parasitol. 89:516–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L., Houle D. (1996). The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:1415–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M.J. (1998). Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281:1999–2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk S. K. (2000). Sensory exploitation as an evolutionary origin to nuptial food gifts in insects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw F. H., Shaw R. G., Wilkinson G. S., Turelli M. (1995). Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz!. Evolution 49:1260–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R. G. (1987). Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution 41:812–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster M., Wade M.J. (2003). Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton Univeristy Press, Princeton New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, A. (1972). The Biology of Tribolium with Special Emphasis on Genetic Aspects. vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff A. (1974). The Biology of Tribolium with Special Emphasis on Genetic Aspects. vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff A., Slatis H. M., Stanley J. (1960). The black mutation in Tribolium castaneum. J. Hered. 51:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy D. W., Powell B. E., McClafferty J.A. (2002). Male traits under cryptic female choice in the spotted cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Behav. Ecol. 13:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy D. W., Burton Darlington M., Pesek J. D., Powell B. E. (2003). Copulatory courtship signals male genetic quality in cucumber beetles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R. (1983). Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 122:765–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins J. L., Radwan J., Kotiaho J. S., Tregenza T. (2004). Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and the Swedish Research Council for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Edvardsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edvardsson, M., Arnqvist, G. No Apparent Indirect Genetic Benefits to Female Red Flour Beetles Preferring Males with Intense Copulatory Courtship. Behav Genet 36, 775–782 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-9043-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-9043-6

Keywords

Navigation